They have done so ever since he made them public, and while a lot of things about society have changed, the fundamental truth of how society handles its problems, its differences, and its dissenters have not. A lot of what Plato pointed out through his rendition of the dialogue of Socrates is still very accurate today, and much of what he said in The Allegory of the Cave is also very accurate in the sense of being how society views itself in today's world.
The conclusions that Plato reached in his works have held up because they are honest and true. They also hold because human nature has not really changed very much since Plato's time (Nails, 2006). Technology and many other things have likely advanced far beyond what Plato could have imagined during his lifetime, but the intrinsic nature of the human beings who create that technology has stayed the same, and it appears as though it will continue to do so. This is a large part of what makes Plato's musings so valuable to philosophers and others. Would Socrates be persecuted today? It depends on exactly what he did based on the laws that are available today, but the differences that he had would very likely not be well understood.
Tolerance for religion and for people who are anti-government, anti-society, or that work to bring people to 'their side' and away from the whole of society is usually low, overall. People who keep to themselves are left alone, and people who 'make waves' are not. This has not changed. Not all publicity is good publicity, and people who cause problems are at least closely watched, in an effort to determine whether what they are doing is criminal. If they are found to be doing something that is against society, there are often laws that are broken. Many of these laws do not result in the kind of serious sentence that Socrates was given, but dissent of certain types is still a punishable offence.
Plato and Learning
Plato wanted, in many of his writings, to give a very clear explanation of how he felt human beings learned about life, ethics, morality, and anything else that shaped their world (Nails, 2006). The Allegory of the Cave is the clearest of all of his work, but The Apology is also very clear in what it is trying to say. Not only does Plato discuss education, but philosophy, a society's political life, and human...
A lot of people today still do not wish to look at any other way of doing things, or seeing things, and that makes them content to sit and stare at whatever they have become used to seeing. In The Apology, the people who are persecuting Socrates clearly have the same basic mentality as the people in the cave, in that they do not see how something different can be good, acceptable, or even better than what they already have (Nails, 2006). They are failing to look at the big picture, and only showing that they do not like change.
They do not see much of anything as necessarily bad or good in many cases, and they simply go through their life from day-to-day without actually realizing that there is much more out there to be seen and heard and experienced if they would be willing to open their eyes, hearts, and minds to it. Learning is something that is touted by society as being very important, but the only kind of learning that is acceptable is the learning that society has designed for its people (Nails, 2006). In other words, when someone comes along with a radical new idea, he or she is thought to be wrong, insane, or dangerous, as opposed to a visionary.
Plato was one of the great philosophers of his time, and the reason that he is still seen as having such importance comes from the idea that what he had to say was essentially timeless. That is very valuable, and it helps to show that, for all of the differences in society today, the similarities are stronger. People still band together, overall, against things that they feel are wrong or different, just like they did when Socrates was convicted and sentenced to death. In addition, people still do not like change, just as they showed in The Allegory of the Cave. With that in mind, what Plato had to say will still be relevant even hundreds of years into the future. That is not only the mark of a good philosopher, but it is also the mark of someone who truly understood humanity and all of its triumphs and flaws.
Through the dialogue of Socrates and the people who lived in the cave, Plato shows that there is still much to be understood and thought about. If the people in society do not take the time to think about what they are doing and where they are going, nothing will change. That was true in the time of Plato, and it is true now. How society would grow and change in the future was something that Plato could not accurately predict, but yet he was such a strong student of the world that he was aware of the intrinsic thought patterns of the society in which he lived and how those patterns would not change quickly over time.
Aristotle (1958) Politics. Trans. & Ed. Ernest Barker. London: Oxford University Press.
Guthrie, W.K.C. (1986). A History of Greek Philosophy: Volume 4, Plato: The Man and His Dialogues: Earlier Period. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Kahn, Charles H. (2004). "The Framework," Plato and the socratic dialogue: The Philosophical Use of a Literary Form. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nails, Debra (2006). "The Life of Plato of Athens," A Companion to Plato edited by Hugh…
A lot of what Plato pointed out through his rendition of the dialogue of Socrates is still very accurate today, and much of what he said in The Allegory of the Cave is also very accurate in the sense of being how society views itself in today's world.
Plato and Socrates -- Human Soul There are a number of philosophical tenets that have been the subject of intense scrutiny since humans coalesced into formal societies. Who are we as a species? Where do we fit in with the universe? What is morality? Do the ends justify the means? Moreover, most of all, why are we here and are we free to act as individuals toward greater good? Free will,
Abstract Plato’s concepts of art and aesthetics encompass the core elements of his philosophical principles. Specifically, Plato shows how art becomes an imitation of an imitation: a clear reference to the philosopher’s concept of forms. Within Plato’s philosophy of art being nothing more than an imitation of an imitation is a value judgment, because Plato proposes that anything that is an imitation is also something that distracts and distorts reality. In
Self-Reflection and the Philosophical Mirror In Plato's Socratic dialogue in Apology, Socrates makes the bold declaration that "the unexamined life is not worth living" (Apology 38a). Since I am a great believer in the value of self-examination, this quote seemed to be a perfect opening to my essay. However, as I delved deeper into the text, I began to realize that this quote is often taken out of context. On a
However, many times, viewing an object in relation to other objects does indeed transcend the permanence of the meaning and create new meaning. Therefore, our knowledge of what we are convinced is real can change, which highlights the question of whether or not our original knowledge was real before it changed; or if knowledge can ever be real. Socrates posed these questions initially, pondering the ability to agree that
Aristotle v. Plato Compare and contrast the metaphysical position of Aristotle and Plato. Does Aristotle's work constitute a sharp break with the position laid down by his teacher? Or is the old saying true that he apple does not fall far from the tree? Although their positions are often elided, the focus of Aristotle and Plato's metaphysical emphases is quite different. Ironically, given that one of his most famous works is called
Cypher's desire in The Matrix, to be plugged back into the program. It is maintained that this desire is wrong or misleading from the viewpoints of both Plato and Socrates, who say that knowledge is virtue and thus, nothingness -- the result of the Matrix -- is essentially nothing. Ignorance is bliss" The first important philosophical question raised by The Matrix is whether reality is better than illusion, or the other