Prison Experiment There Are Many Term Paper

PAGES
2
WORDS
793
Cite

Zimbardo (1973) did discuss for future experiments the use of a neutral person that would observe the experiment, not be involved and would call it quits if things got out of hand. This is a good idea, however safe guards would be needed just in case this person became pulled into the experiment. There would need to be clear definitions of what meant that the experiment was getting out of hand. I wonder if Zimbardo could have gotten a taste of the effects of a situation like this, by having something similar, but on a smaller scale. In stead of giving no instruction for behavior, at least having some limitations, for example, no beating the prisoners. The chain around the ankle and using ID numbers instead of names seems to be at least a little more acceptable (Carnahan, 2007).

In order to obtain these exact results, I do not know if a more ethical experiment would result the same. I cannot think of how this experiment could be carried out ethically, but I am only one person. I have faith that at team of individuals could design an experiment like this, but ethical. Online, I looked up Milgram's experiment. It said it took place in the 1960's, and that Milgram wrote a book discussing the experiment in 1974....

...

Was it not in circulation sooner? If it was, how did Zimbardo gain approval for this study? I understand no one was aware and could have accurately predicted the intensity of this experiment as well as the effects, but I would have thought that after Milgram's experiment a greater degree of skepticism would have been present (Xavier, 2008).
Overall, according to many of the standards mentioned above, the experiment could not have been conducted. There is now more scrutiny regarding experiments of this nature. Furthermore, as the information age continues to evolve, society overall will quickly apprehend and halt many of these experiments from occurring.

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

1) Carnahan, T. & McFarland, S. (2007). Revisiting the Stanford Prison Experiment: Could participant self-selection have led to the cruelty? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 33, No. 5, 603-614

2) Xavier, Robert. "The Stanford Prison Experiment: Exploring the Ethical Issues." Yahoo! Contributor Network. Yahoo.com, 05 Jan. 2008. Web. 16 June 2013.

3) Zimbardo, P.G. (2007). The Lucifer Effect: Understanding How Good People Turn Evil. New York: Random House


Cite this Document:

"Prison Experiment There Are Many" (2013, June 16) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prison-experiment-there-are-many-92070

"Prison Experiment There Are Many" 16 June 2013. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prison-experiment-there-are-many-92070>

"Prison Experiment There Are Many", 16 June 2013, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/prison-experiment-there-are-many-92070

Related Documents

Stanford Prison Experiment Ethical issues are always first and foremost a subject of ambiguous grounds when it comes to experiments that are hinged on human behavior. Whether this is because of the short- and long-term consequences of psychological and physical harm, ethical questions are raised with regards to how much scientific benefit can be accrued from conducting such an experiment. This question remains heavily controversial especially in the Stanford Prison Experiment,

Stanford Prison experiment was to examine the psychological and sociological effects of incarceration. In particular, researchers set out to examine how prisoners reacted to being bereft of power. Ultimately the experiment illustrated not just how prisoners reacted to being powerless, but also how simulated guards reacted to being bestowed with nearly unlimited power over others. The experiment was therefore exploratory in nature. Shuttleworth (2008) claims that the researcher Zimbardo

Among the dozen investigations of the Abu Ghraib abuses, one found that the landmark Stanford study provided a cautionary tale for all military detention operations. In differentiating the comparatively benign environment of the Stanford prison experiment, this report makes obvious that in military detention operations, soldiers work under demanding combat conditions that are far from benign. The insinuation is that those combat conditions might be anticipated to produce even

Stanford Prison Experiment The roles we take on in our everyday lives are dictated by several factors. Whether it's the role of mother, son, student, cashier, accountant, boyfriend, wife, or teacher, the roles that make up our identities are varied and we slip into and out of them without any conscious thought. These roles are adopted by us based on expectations and assumptions prescribed to us by ourselves and others. The

Human Aggression and the Stanford Prison Experiments Studies of human aggression tend toward myriad and often competing conclusions about that which drives us to behave ethically or unethically, about the forces that incline us toward altruism as opposed to those which incline us toward aggression, about the impulses to behave according to internal values and the pressures to bend to contextual authority. Perhaps few studies on the subject have penetrated the

Participants in the study did receive a psychological testing battery but in the study it is reported that scores were not known until the close of the experiment. This may mean that the aggressive behavior seen in the experiment was not due to the effect of the situation on the person, but rather the interaction of the person in the situation. Members of the study staff (minus Dr. Zimbardo,