Standard work schedules and traffic congestion for federal employees in Washington D.C.
✍️ How to write this paper — writing tools ▾
Problem Solving Process - Why a Standard Work Schedule Does Not Work for Every Federal Employee in the National Capitol Commuting Area
The modern day employers are faced with rapidly evolving issues. If in the recent past they sought ways to increase customer satisfaction and integrate the latest technological advancements in order to increase operational efficiency, today, they come to place an increased emphasis on employee satisfaction. Academic studies and practitioners' conclusions have revealed that a satisfied employee is generally a hard working employee, who will strive to increase his performances and support the organization in reaching its overall objectives.
Private and public executives develop and implement numerous strategies aimed at increasing on-the-job satisfaction, some of the most notable ones including promotions, salary raises, extensive medical coverage, the organization of social interactions outside the workplace or the creation of more flexible schedules. The need to address these issues comes from the recent changes in the social and economic backgrounds. With more and more women working outside the household, with a growing economy that allows for increased levels of consumption or the growing numbers of automobiles owners, traffic has become a real challenge for organizational commuters. The aim of this paper is to analyze traffic as an organizational challenge as well as to propose solutions to resolving it, such as the offering of more flexible schedules. This will be achieved in five successive steps, as suggested by the Creative Problem Solving program (Treffinger. Isaksen and Stead-Dorval, 2005).
1. Analyzing Problems
Traffic in the Washington area is extremely congested and this constitutes a severe problem due to the fact that the large majority of those employed in the region lives in the Virginia and Maryland suburbs and has to commute to work. This basically means that they have to spend increasing amounts of time stuck in traffic, issue which generates a series of negative effects. The Forbes Magazine has for instance reached a conclusion that the workers in the Washington area spend an annual 60 hours stuck in traffic; this is the second largest rate within the North American country. Additionally, only a limited 26% of all the employees in the region manage to get to work in less than 20 minutes, with the 59% having to waste somewhere between 20 and 60 minutes to get to work; 15% of all employees in the Washington area take more than one hour to get to work. The magazine ranked Washington D.C. The seventh worst city for commuters, with the single features that did not ensure a higher position within the hierarchy being the city's high levels of efficiency relative to carpooling, walking areas and public transportation, which in fact stand for the second best system within the United States (Woolsey, 2008).
2. Redefining Problems
The issue stated in the first section seems clear-and-cut, but a more in depth look will reveal that the direct and indirect effects commuting in a congested traffic give birth to more severe challenges. In this order of ideas, the employees who commute to work and spend several minutes to more than hour in heavy traffic are often frustrated and when they do get to work, they need time to calm down in order to be able to complete their daily chores. The commuters are not only disturbed by the time wasted, but also by the actual agglomeration and noise generated by heavy traffic (American Society for Testing and Materials, 1979). Otherwise put, the consequence of the problem is materialized in reduced employee morale, which in turn generates reduced desire to work and a decreased overall operational efficiency.
Secondly, the employees' being late materializes in the need for the administrative staff to reorganize the daily tasks and to address the matter. This then means that the executives and secretaries of the organizations in the Washington D.C. area have to adapt to the 'traffic conditions', putting aside or delaying their chores in order to address the tardiness issues. Ultimately then, the matters of traffic congestions as they influence commuting employees result in organizational weaknesses, mostly due to a reduced employee morale, the need to address the problem and an overall reduced operational efficiency throughout the entire institution. This will consequently lead to a reduced quality of the company's products and services and a reduced satisfaction from the part of customers.
Managers in the region have already recognized the gravity of the situation and have strived to develop and implement several solutions that resolve the traffic and tardiness problems, or at least limit their negative effects upon employees and employer.
4. Evaluating and Selecting Ideas
At this stage of the Creative Problem Solving, the manager has to assess the previously identified solutions and select the most suitable one. The process is generically conducted through the analysis of the proposed solutions through the lenses of several criteria. In the current situation, the most adequate analysis manner seems the cost-benefit analysis, which will reveal the benefits and limitations of each strategy. The most adequate resolution will consist of the plan generating the most beneficial outcomes and the fewest limitations. The intensity of the advantages and disadvantages must also be assessed. Taking no action will for instance generate the benefit of no additional risk, but the limitation of no improvements. In this scenario, the limitation weights more than the gain.
1. Flexible schedule - Far more benefits, which weight heavier that the costs
Costs: additional time, efforts and resources to adapt to the new schedule; operational efficiency could decrease in the short run, throughout the period of adjustment to the new work schedule
Benefits: employees can arrive at and leave work at times which avoid heavy traffic hours; this will then ensure that their frustrations are reduced and they are better able to perform their tasks; the fact that the management addresses their problems will ensure employees that they are valued by the employer; other issues could be resolved through the implementation of the schedule and the most relevant example in this sense is a single working parent who has to drive the children to school, the doctor or other appointments and might come in late - the flexible schedule would also resolve this personal problems to further increase employee satisfaction (Rogier and Padgett); given that tardiness is reduced, the administrative staff will be able to focus more on their daily chores and less on lateness issues; with increased employee morale, performances are likely to increase and consequently, so are the company's operational efficiency and chances for successful outcomes on the long-term
2. Taking No Action - the costs of this approach weight far more than the benefits
Costs: immediate improvements are unlikely to occur; most of the hope for future advances lays in the responsibilities and capabilities of the Washington D.C. authorities; the problem might degenerate in the future
Benefits: it requires no additional investments and no risks; short-term operational efficiency and productivity will not be affected as a result of organizational changes
3. Acceptance of two lost hours due to heavy traffic - the losses are more numerous and significant than the gains
Costs: given that only 25 employees commute and they each book two lost hours per week due to traffic (and it is highly probable for them to use the two hours whether they need them or not), the company would lose 50 hours of work; internal tensions would occur and the morale of the employees who do not commute and do not get two free hours would significantly suffer; this would generate not only reduced operational efficiency, but also financial losses and would eventually come to affect the organization's health and stability
Benefits: the morale of the commuting employees would significantly increase; it is also possible for them to be more motivated to complete their tasks in reduced amounts of time, generating as such increases in operational efficiency
4. Telecommuting - similar costs and benefits, but the benefits seem to weigh more as they help the company take one step forward in adapting to the modern society
Costs: decentralization of organizational tasks; loss of some control; relies on the employees' sense of responsibility; not all positions can be attended through telework
Benefits: increased employee morale; full resolution to the problem of heavy traffic; cost reductions as the company will consume fewer resources to sustain the hosting of employees
5. Implementing Solutions
As a result of the previous analysis, one could conclude that the most adequate solution is the implementation of a flexible work schedule, combined, where possible, with telecommuting practices. The barriers in the implementation process could revolve the employees' reticence to change and the management's fear of a decentralized system and reduced control. The actual steps to be taken in the development and implementation of the flextime and telecommute schedule are succinctly presented below:
Conduct research in order to reveal the expected reactions - this could be achieved through surveys
Hire a firm specialized on management consultancy and request their analysis of the organization
Together with the consultants, identify and develop a plan suited for the tasks that could be completed through telecommuting
Develop programs of flexible time for those positions which cannot be telecommuted
Perfect the communications network through the purchase of advanced technologies that will allow phone calls, emails, teleconferences and other such features
Set the basis for clear discussions and open communications between employees and executives
Develop a clear control process that will asses the performances of the new decentralized system; identify shortage and propose solutions to overcoming the limitations
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.