Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Procedural and Substantive Law
Comparison:
The cases of Terry v. Ohio (1968) and State v. Perkins (2003) both deal with issues of search and seizure as explained in the fourth Amendment to the United States' Constitution. According to this Amendment, police or government officials are not allowed to perform unlawful searches and seizures. This was written in response to how the colonists lived under British rule wherein soldiers could enter the homes of any colonists at any time, and take any goods and materials they desired regardless of whether they had a cause to do so.
Contrast:
The major difference between the two cases seems to be that the case of Terry v. Ohio helped to expand the powers of police in their investigations, whereas State v. Perkins proved to limit the abilities of the police in terms of confiscation of weapons. During the Terry v. Ohio case, there was a clear and...
They were behaving in a suspicious manner which a trained officer would identify as likely linked to a potential crime, which turned out to be the case. Because of this, the courts ruled that the firearms seized should be admissible. In the State v. Perkins case, police seized some eighty-four guns from the household of one Frank Perkins after they were called on a domestic abuse call. Perkins was found in his bedroom and not using any weapons at the moment. Despite that there were weapons within the home, there was not suitable cause to take them.
Analysis:
In terms of further legislation, the case of Terry v. Ohio ensured that from that point on, police searches of a person were legal without probable cause, provided the officer believed that the person had just or was about to commit a crime (Terry 1968). If the police have a…
Works Cited
State v. Perkins. (2003). 358 N.J. Super. 151
Terry v. Ohio. (1968). 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct.
law in England are: common law, statute law, subordinate legislation, custom, and European community law. Common law: This is the cannon of law applying to the general swathes of law that are decided by the judges and adapted to changing times. Judges make its rules over the years that have relied on precedents of other cases and adapted preceding rulings to suit the circumstances of the present instance. Each new
law that you believe has most strongly influenced modern criminal law. Explain the theory and the basis for your selection. From there, explain why an understanding of statutory law is necessary in a criminal justice context. Select one statute on any criminal law. Use that statute as your point of reference to support your positions and conclusions. Conclude by selecting one case involving a criminal procedural issue and another
This essay provides a brief overview of several of the key factors in conflict of laws, including the areas where choice of law is likely to be at issue. Domicile Domicile is one of the key factors in choice of law. Domicile is not the same as location. Instead, domicile is a legal fiction connecting a person to a location for a specific purpose. Domicile impacts jurisdiction and choice of law.
Criminal Law Due Process Due process is an essential guarantee of basic fairness for citizens based on law. It has two basic goals; to produce accurate results through fair procedure to prevent wrongful deprivation of interests and to make people feel the government treated them fairly by listening to their side of the story (Procedural Due Process). Due process requires fair procedures when governments take actions against citizens, whether it is
Law: Aviation Law Reflective EssayPart 1: ReflectionThe module is important with its relevancy to the Aviation industry since it would help understand the law of aviation in the country. When one has to adopt a professional career in a certain field, one has to get familiar with the laws and policies, which are a �code of conduct� for carrying out certain actions that are allowed and preventing those prohibited. It
Conflict of LawsIntroductionA discrepancy between the laws of two or more jurisdictions has some bearing on a case, such that the outcome is determined by which jurisdiction�s law is applied to each subject in question. The contradictory legal rules could stem from federal law in the United States, state law in the United States, or international law. When competing laws emerge, the first question emerges: which law should be employed