Essay Doctorate 1,157 words

Gender Bias in Job Fair Summary, Conclusions,

Last reviewed: June 10, 2013 ~6 min read
Abstract

This study focuses on gender bias on the recruitment process at job fairs and the study collect data using quantitative technique. The statistical tool reveals that gender bias is more prominent at job fairs than the office setting. The research suggests that organizations need to implement the same formal control used at office setting at job fairs when implementing a recruitment process.

Gender Bias in Job Fair

Summary, Conclusions, and Recommendations

Terminology and Definitions

Permission to Conduct Study

Transmittal Letter/Survey Instructions

Survey/Interview Questions

Gender Bias in the Recruitment Process at Job Fairs

Administrative Research Problem

Gender bias is problematic for organizations that wish to increase innovation and avoid legal problems due to their hiring practices. Federal law requires that organizations should not exclude persons in their hiring practices based on their gender, race, or ethnicity. Hiring must be based solely on the person's ability and suitability for the job. Avoiding bias helps organizations to increase innovation due to the different perspectives that each person will add to the organization. Bias in hiring practices can be intentional or unintentional. Regardless of the motive, it is necessary to avoid bias in hiring practices. This research intends to explore the question surrounding job fairs. The study will explore the question of whether bias exists during the recruitment process at job fairs.

Research demonstrates that gender bias is still a pervasive problem in the hiring process. In a study that manipulated two variables, job sex-type and candidate sex; it was found that gender played a significant role behind the hiring choices of organizations (Luzadis, Wesolowski, & Snavely, 2008). It appears that certain jobs are considered appropriate for males and others are considered appropriate for females. Job stereotyping may be directly linked to gender bias in the hiring process.

Another study examined the effects of employee race on hiring procedures using factors suitability such as cognitive ability, psychomotor ability, previous work experience, objective measures of performance, and other factors necessary to select sewing machine operators in the U.S.A. The dependent variable in the study was gender. This study focused on performance three months after hiring in an attempt to relate it to the selection process. It was found that race had an effect on the cognitive ability of the worker, however, psychomotor ability and previous work experience did not (Gardner & Deadrick, 2012). Only women were included in the study, largely because the only applicants were women. This suggests job stereotyping among sewing machine operators in the U.S.

Hausman, (2012) examined measures that Congress could take to reduce discrimination. The study found that Title VII of the Civil Right Act 1964 could do little to reduce unintentional bias in employment decisions. Anonymous hiring has been suggested as a solution to the problem, stripping resumes of all issues related to race or sex. Unconscious bias was found to be problematic, regardless of organizational intension to do away with it.

Research on gender bias in hiring practices has taken place in a number of different settings. It has been suggested that appearance is an important part of the hiring process. This research will explore gender bias as a factor in a specific setting. It will explore whether gender bias exists in hiring practices at job fairs. Research suggests that gender and other characteristics will play a role in hiring selection.

Research Problem

The job fair offers a unique setting where applicants and job providers can meet face-to-face, without the formal process of first submitting a resume or filling out a job application. It is human nature to begin sizing up someone and making inferences about him or her as soon as we see them. In the office setting, certain procedures and elements are present avoid gender bias. Human Resources offices have posters, policies, procedures and other elements that present a supportive environment for avoiding gender bias. In addition, the presence of others in the same room that has the same goals is another element that enhances decision making in selecting candidates on qualities other than gender.

In the office setting, controls are in place to ensure that hiring process is based on skills other than gender. Job Fairs are an excellent place to find quality employees. However, they offer a different setting from the office. At the job fair, another element of the human psyche can take over, presenting the potential for gender bias in the hiring process. Without the social pressures and controls of the office, the hiring professional may inadvertently engage in gender bias. It may begin as soon as the candidate approaches the table. Avoiding gender bias at job fairs presents a unique problem to organizations. The problem is how to avoid gender bias in the hiring process at job fairs and to make certain that hiring practices at job fairs are consistent with hiring practices that take place at the office.

Research Objective

This study intends to provide practical information to hiring personnel and administrative staff to help them avoid gender bias in their hiring practices at job fair setting. This research will make them more aware of the problem and ways they can avoid the practice. The gender bias in hiring practices can have serious consequences, both professionally and legally. Federal law states that hiring process should be fair and equitable. The job fair setting provides a unique environment that is outside the office control and that holds the potential for gender bias to develop. This research will play an important role in the field, as it will fill the gap in the field of human resources. Consistency with hiring practices, it is essential to make certain that the setting does not influence the consistency and fairness of hiring practices. If gender bias is found, then this research will provide solutions to the problem. If gender bias at job fairs is not different from what is found in the office, then policies will be developed to correct the gender bias within job fairs. The results of this research will help professionals to avoid a potential threat to fairness in their hiring policies.

You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
References
21 sources cited in this paper
  • Abbas, Q. (2011). Gender Discrimination & Its Effect on Employee Performance /Productivity. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science.1(15):170-176.
  • Beam, Emily. (2012). Incomplete Information in Job Search: Evidence from a Field Experiment in the Philippines October 22, 2012. Retrieved from
  • http://www.iza.org/conference_files/worldb2012/beam_e8175.pdf
  • Elisabeth, K. K. (2009). Gender Fatigue and the Ideological Dilemma of Gender Neutrality and Discrimination in Organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences .26: 197-210.
  • Ford, T., Gambino, F., & Hanjoon, L. et al (2004). The role of accountability in suppressing
  • Management pre-interview bias against African-American sales job applicants. Journal of
  • Personal Selling & Sales Management. March 22, 2004. Retrieved from
  • http://business.highbeam.com/4492/article-1G1-128977456/role-accountability-
  • suppressing-managers-preinterview
  • Gardner, D., Deadrick, G., & Diana L (2012). Moderation of selection procedure validity by employee race. Journal of Managerial Psychology . 27. (4): 365-382.
  • Harris, J. (2012). Data Is Useless Without the Skills to Analyze It. Harvard Business Review.
  • Hausman, D. (2012) How Congress Could Reduce Job Discrimination by Promoting Anonymous Hiring. Stanford Law Review. 64 (5): 1343-1369.
  • Heather A. Vanessa E. Deborah, C. (2009). Exploring the relationship between sexual harassment and sex discrimination and Gender-biased behavior at work. Journal of Economic Psychology. 30: 782–792.
  • Georgia Institute of Technology (2012). Analysis - Overview.USA.
  • Luzadis, R., Wesolowski, M., & Snavely, B. (2008). Understanding Criterion Choice in Hiring Decisions from a Prescriptive Gender Bias Perspective: Journal of Managerial Issues. 20 (4): 468-484.
  • Mather, R. & Brand, S. (2012). Special Issue Foundations for Experimental Social Psychology: Requiem for Classic Social Psychology. June 2012 Journal of Scientific Psychology. Retrieved from http://www.psyencelab.com/images/Foundations_for_Experimental_%20Social_Psychol ogy.pdf
  • Milley, J. E. (1979). An Investigation of case study as an approach to program evaluation. [Paper presented at the 19th Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research in San Diego, CA] Retrieved http://writing.colostate.edu/guides/research/casestudy/pop2e.cfm
  • Neuman, W. L. (2007). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Petersen, T. & Thea, T. (2006). Getting the offer: Sex discrimination in hiring. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility science Direct. 24: 239–257.
  • Pingitore, R., Dugoni, B. & Tindale, S. et al. (1994). Bias against overweight job applicants in a Simulated employment interview. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(6), 909-917. (2012). ATLAS.ti Retrieved http://www.atlasti.com/.
  • Shuttleworth, M. (2008). Case study research design. Experiment Resources. Retrieved http://www.experiment-resources.com/case-study-research-design.html
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2013). Gender Bias in Job Fair Summary, Conclusions,. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/essay/gender-bias-in-job-fair-summary-conclusions-91772

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.