" (e.g., Kane, 1998, cited by Dale, and Krueger 1999, 1) as higher education constitutes up 40% of total U.S. educational expenditures, understanding "the impact of selective colleges on students' labor market outcomes is central for understanding the role of human capital," Dale, and Krueger (1999, 1) stress.
Previous literature cited by Dale, and Krueger (1999, 1) includes work by "Hunt (1963), Solnion (1973), Wales (1973), Solmon and Wachtel (1975), and Wise (1975),...Brewer and Ehrenberg (1996), Behrman et al. (1996), Daniel (1997), Kane (1998), and others." c. BACKGROUND:
To remove the effect of unobserved characteristics that influence college admission, this study considers information on the set of colleges where students were accepted and rejected.
A difficulty interpreting past estimates a many estimates of the effect of college quality on students' subsequent earnings.
d. EVIDENCE:
In their study, Dale, and Krueger (1999, 1):
match students in the newly collected College and Beyond (C&B) Data Set who were admitted to and rejected from a similar set of institutions, and estimate fixed effects models. As another approach to adjust for selection bias, we [Dale, and Krueger, (1999)] control for the average SAT score of the schools to which students applied using both the C&B and National Longitudinal Survey of the High School Class of 1972."
Dale, and Krueger (1999, 2) employ two new approaches to amend non-random selection of students on the part of elite colleges. In one approach, they only compare college quality and earnings among students accepted and rejected by a comparable set of colleges; students comparable in provisions of observable variables. In their second approach, Dale, and Krueger (1999, 2) hold the average SAT score of the schools to which each student applied constant, "as well as the average SAT score of the school the student attended, the student's SAT score, and other variables. The second approach is nested in the first estimator."
The most convincing evidence the authors present in support of their arguments includes:."..the average tuition charged by the school is significantly related to the students' subsequent earnings." Dale, and Krueger (1999, 31) state, "we find a substantial internal rate of return from attending a more costly college. Lastly, the payoff to attending an elite college appears to be greater for students from more disadvantaged family backgrounds." Their weakest arguments evolve from the fact that after Dale, and Krueger 1999 (30) correct for students' unobserved characteristics, findings cast doubt on the perception that school selectivity, as measured by the average SAT score of freshmen who attend a college, constitutes a vital determinant of students' subsequent incomes.
4. How Robust is the Evidence on the Effects of College Quality? Evidence from Matching a. In BRIEF:
Black and Smith (2003, 1) contend: "The basic finding is that college quality matters for later labor market outcomes." investigated two potential weaknesses in the most commonly used econometric approach in the literature that estimates the labor market effects of college quality 23).
Based on an individuals' ability, substantial sorting exists into colleges of differing qualities for men and women in the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (LSY). "Higher ability students disproportionately attend higher quality colleges. (some evidence of an asymmetry [found], with more high-ability students at low-quality colleges) Sorting on ability alone, however, does not break the support condition." (Black and Smith 2003, 24) Although some concerns arise, revolving around the conventional practice of utilizing "linear selection on observables models to investigate the labor market effects of college quality,...the matching estimates support the overall finding of the regression-based literature that college quality matters for labor market outcomes."
Estimates "based only on the 'thick support' region of propensity scores around 0.5 consistently turn out larger than those constructed using the full sample." b. MOTIVATION:
To inform their analysis of the support condition, Black and Smith (2003) utilize data from the 1979 cohort of the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth (NLSY) to examine how students of varying abilities, as measured by the first principal component of the ten tests that comprise the Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery. This researcher basically agrees with how the authors view the context of the issue. One consideration this researcher contends may have been minimized more should have been would be "the important role of family background for both labor market outcomes and college quality choices...." (Black and Smith 2003, 22) Although the researchers included this in their analysis, the approach seemed to somewhat minimize the familial factor.
c. BACKGROUND:
Previous research includes work by "Black, Daniel, and Smith (2003a,b),...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now