Samsung Electronics
How well is the present strategy working?
The present strategy is working better than the management of Samsung had anticipated. This is because they are finding ways, to innovate in a number of different areas of consumer electronics. Their main focus has been delivering high quality portable devices that are in demand. This strategy has allowed the company to shift from manufacturing low cost electronics, to becoming one the top corporations, selling a variety of innovative devices. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
What is the current strategy and goals?
The current strategy is to focus on providing portable electronic devices that can be used for a number of different activities. Where, these various products can be utilized in conjunction with one another, to make life easier for everyone. For example, Samsung introduced the Nexio to provide consumers with the power of a lap top from a device the size of a smart phone. What made this product so unique is it offers the same kind of applications as a traditional lap top. To achieve this goal, means that the company must deliver more cutting edge products, to consumers quickly. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Compare performance via benchmarks
Samsung has changed from being a small electronics manufacturer, to becoming one the top producers for a host of electronic devices. This has allowed the company to be able to surpass the size of various rivals in the industry. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Industry Average
The industry has been experiencing above average growth since the late 1990's. This is when there would be a shift in the way information was stored and recorded, as there was more of an emphasis on the use of digital technology (through various portable devices). (Cheidozie, 2008) The average size of the industry, based upon market capitalization is $99.78 million. ("Sony, " 2010) This is below the market capitalization for Samsung, which is over $100 billion. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Key Rivals
Samsung Electronics is larger than the any of their different key rivals. Evidence of this can be seen by comparing the size of the market cap for various competitors to include: Sony (having a market cap of $32.34 billion), Panasonic (which has a market cap of $29.61 billion) and Sanyo (having a market cap of $10.15 billion). ("Sony," 2010)
Examine Critical Trends
The critical trend in the industry is: various electronic devices are becoming smaller and more powerful. This means that all manufacturers must be able to deliver products that offer the same features as competitors and including additional applications. (Cheidozie, 2008)
What are the resource strengths and weaknesses, and the external opportunities and threats?
Resources internal to the company
The internal resources for the company would be: the innovative ideas they receive from the staff and how they can observe the way consumers utilize various products. This is important, because it gives the company the unique advantage of understanding customer needs. At which point, they can begin implementing what they observe into the design. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
External is specific to the focal firm; different firms have different opportunities and threats
The biggest threat that Samsung faces is a sense of complacency, where the organization could become a victim of its own external successes. At which point, the odds increase, that innovation and collaboration could decline. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Measures of strengths and capabilities
Samsung is interested in proving the best products and service to customers. As a result, they utilize a merit-based performance system, where there is an emphasis on having everyone sharing their ideas with top management. This establishes a system to addresses the different areas of competence within an organization. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Evaluation of Resources
The most valuable resources that Samsung would have are: their employees. This is important, because the staff can help management be able to improve their products and services. At the same time, they can help increase quality and how long it will take to introduce a new product to the market. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Competitive Liabilities
When you analyze the various KSF weaknesses in comparison to other competitors, it is clear that the biggest weakness facing Samsung is: innovation. Where, a rival could develop a product that is the equivalent of the I Phone. Once this takes place, it could put the company at a distinct disadvantage, in trying to catch up with the innovations introduced by a competitor. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
Are the prices and costs competitive?
The prices and costs for the different products that Samsung Electronics sell are competitive.
Value Chain Analysis
When you conduct a value chain analysis, the value is added through: quality and innovative ideas. During the manufacturing process, this allows the various devices to be seen as superior to competitors. At the same time, the flexibility of the process allows the different departments to work together, in improving the quality of the product and the time it takes to introduce them to the market. ("Value Chain Analysis," 2010)
Critical Activities and Combinations of Activities
The critical activities are improved collaboration. This is important, because it is combining the various functions of different departments (through combined activities) to have an impact on the end products that are delivered to consumers. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
What Activities are Strategically Important
The biggest activities that have the most significance are: improved collaboration, flexibility and the ability to understand the demands of customers. These different elements have allowed Samsung to rebrand itself over the last ten years. ("Case 26 Samsung Electronics," n.d.)
You’re 83% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.