Self-Managed Work Teams An Organization's Research Paper

Departments are interdependent and conflicts arise where solutions are needed promptly. The traditional hierarchy sometimes is not the best in offering solutions especially where time is of utmost importance. By using clear guidelines, self-management teams are given more freedom to come up with solution to their specific problems on their tasks (Beyerlein M., n, d). This reduces the time wasted whereby in a traditional model a manager would have to get all the details first and then choose the appropriate solution. Moreover, self-management team takes on the management of the work thereby removing the need for a manager or supervisor. Self-management work teams reduce the reliance on individual's abilities and encourage learning from peers. This ensures there is free flow of information and skills are easily passed from colleague to colleague. Members are interdependent and are able to learn from each other, they are able to come up with better plans and procedures to accomplish their tasks. Responsibility is shared and everyone knows what the other is doing creating a harmonious working atmosphere. There is less stress on the team's leader as everyone contributes to the management and coming up with solutions at every stage in the process of achieving of their objectives.

Conflict is less likely to arise...

...

Even though conflict will always arise, it will be minimized with the shared perspective in the team. Every team member contributes to the running of the team and so there is less of 'what's in it for me' attitude. As the members are the ones who monitor their own progress and set timelines, it becomes easy to have a measurement of the progress they have made on particular tasks (Pearce, J.H. II & Ravlin, 1987).
Even though self-managed work teams are independent in the way they operate, they still require guidance from leaders in the organization. Self-management can be demanding and some teams cannot fully operate without external help. Self-management work teams will continue to be applied to more organizations as they improve quality, offer more flexibility and reduce operating costs.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Ken Blanchard. "Go Team! Take your team to the Next Level." Berret-Koehler publishing Inc. San Fransisco, CA. 2005.

Pearce, J.H. II & Ravlin, E.C (1987). The design and activation of self-Regulating Work Groups. Human Relations, 40, pp. 751-782.

Beyerlein M., (Ed.), Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams., Vol. 1, Series of self-managed work teams. Greenwich, Connecticut: JAI Press.


Cite this Document:

"Self-Managed Work Teams An Organization's" (2013, May 19) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-managed-work-teams-an-organization-90592

"Self-Managed Work Teams An Organization's" 19 May 2013. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-managed-work-teams-an-organization-90592>

"Self-Managed Work Teams An Organization's", 19 May 2013, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/self-managed-work-teams-an-organization-90592

Related Documents

Teams Analysis of Self-Managed Work Teams The autonomy of work teams has increasingly become a necessity in many enterprises who rely on a depth of expertise, experience and wealth of knowledge that their knowledge-rich employees provide (Roper, Phillips, 2007). Given how complex, diverse and deep specific areas of expertise are in the core functional areas of any business, it isn't possible for a single manager or leader to have an expert-level command

Moreover, the strong correlation between confidence in peers and communication/problem understanding demonstrated that it is the confidence and ability of these co-workers that encourage members of self-managing teams to gather new information and knowledge, so that they may create useful decisions in relation to problem solving. Confidence in peers resulted in a negative, not positive, impact on organization and negotiation. This suggested that confidence in peers has a negative effect

This type of articles which detail an actual situation are relatively scarce as the theoreticians tend to focus on demonstrating the benefits of the implementation of self-managed teams, rather than actually offering a plan based on which the implementation could be completed, or revealing a real life situation with which the readers (and especially the managers or the future managers) can identify. This novel approach makes the article a

Teams allow a group of people within the organization to work closely with one another to arrive at a solution for a problem or an idea for a new project. Teams, when comprised of likeminded people, focus on achieving a work-goal better than a single individual pursuing the same goal. Management's role in developing and nurturing a team is important, selection of team members who can co-ordinate and work without

Team Building Your supervisor assigned a client experiencing uneven performance production facility. The client applied a variety quality diagnostic tools issue discovered machinery processes working tolerances. The variable people. Team building is an important aspect for all organizations. Teams helped to bring together people who have different skills in order for them to achieve one common goal which helps the organizations achieve its set objectives and goals Hackman & Wageman, 2005. The term

It is important to ensure that the team for any specific task comprises members who are knowledgeable and posses the required skills needed to carry out the task. Teams should also try to work across organizational boundaries/levels and break down internal barriers and deal with people and issues directly and avoid hidden agendas from both within the group and from external sources. Prior to selecting team members, the purpose and the