Speech On Guns Why Everyone Should Support Essay

PAGES
3
WORDS
1042
Cite

Speech on Guns Why Everyone Should Support Gun Rights

In the wake of the Trayvon Martin shooting -- a tragedy, in which George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch captain gunned down the unarmed, 17-year-old student -- the country has put gun rights and gun ownership on trial.

Questions are being asked, such as: should we allow people to carry a concealed firearm? Should we pass gun control that limits the number of firearms one can own?

Well, I'm here to tell you that all attacks on gun ownership are patently specious -- not because I have a personal affinity for firearms, but because the facts paint a very clear picture: responsible gun ownership is good for America.

Gun ownership is a quintessential part of American life. As such, it's explicitly articulated in our country's most hallowed document: the U.S. Constitution.

The Second Amendment clearly states: "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

To put it another way, to keep the government in check, to keep despotic regimes from taking control of the White House, to ensure this country remains free at all costs, the right of the people to own firearms shall not be denied.

To be honest, I probably do not need to argue beyond this point. Our Founding Fathers and Framers knew that to keep their democratic experiment from going asunder, the right of the people to protect themselves was of paramount importance.

No freeman shall ever be debarred the use of arms.

-Thomas Jefferson: Draft Virginia Constitution, 1776

They that can give up essential...

...

There're roughly 90 guns per hundred residents in the U.S.
Moreover, since 1980, America has drastically expanded gun rights.

Currently, all but 1 state (Illinois) and the District of Columbia have legalized concealed carry. That is, 49 states now allow law-abiding citizens to carry a concealed handgun, provided they meet certain criteria (pass a background check, have no history of mental illness, etc.).

Given how overwhelming armed U.S. citizens are one would think that violent crime would be shooting through the roof.

But it's not. In fact, crime is at its lowest level since the 1960s.

"In 2009 America's crime rate was roughly the same as in 1968, with the homicide rate being at its lowest level since 1964. Overall, the national crime rate was 3466 crimes per 100,000 residents, down from 3680 crimes per 100,000 residents forty years earlier in 1969 (-9.4%)."

So, how does one explain this? We're more armed than ever before, we have the…

Cite this Document:

"Speech On Guns Why Everyone Should Support" (2012, April 28) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/speech-on-guns-why-everyone-should-support-79650

"Speech On Guns Why Everyone Should Support" 28 April 2012. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/speech-on-guns-why-everyone-should-support-79650>

"Speech On Guns Why Everyone Should Support", 28 April 2012, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/speech-on-guns-why-everyone-should-support-79650

Related Documents

The commercial shows that advertising does not have to have one appeal or appeal to only one audience. Anyone, young or old, who is a fan of the film will immediately see the parody, and will understand the appeal of the commercial. The values of U.S. society are different even from 1984 when the film first aired. Technology is extremely important today, and hardly anyone is without a cell phone.

Gun Fu and Hong Kong Cinema
PAGES 13 WORDS 4492

Bonding Over Bullets: Gun Fu is the Way to a Better Tomorrow John Woo redefined the action film genre with his 1986 Hong Kong film A Better Tomorrow. Staring the Asian TV star Chow Yun Fat and movie star Ti Lung, the film transcended the action genre already well-established in the West by using the various tropes of the genre (gangsters, the conflicted family, brother-against-brother, friend-in-peril, reformed hood, betrayal, and so

limiting free speech ID: 53711 The arguments most often used for limiting freedom of speech include national security, protecting the public from disrupting influences at home, and protecting the public against such things as pornography. Of the three most often given reasons for limiting freedom of speech, national security may well be the most used. President after president, regardless of party has used national security as a reason to not answer

Army Speech A junior ROTC ball is not the most receptive audience for a speech about the future and possible career choices, but nonetheless I was asked to speak to a group of future military members at just such an event. However these future members of the military were still only high school students and I was keeping them from enjoying their party, so I knew I had to somehow captivate

Consequently, the former will attempt to behave toward the latter in view of the prejudices he or she has relating to the particularities present in the latter. Most individuals make use of anti-locution when they put across their discriminatory principles, as it is easier and apparently less immoral to do this. Anti-locution is as wrong as direct discrimination, given the fact that it encourages people to be prejudiced. Avoidance is

Not all people who own guns are criminals nor will they end up using their gun, but it does feel better to know that in a worst case scenario situation, one will be able to fight back on even grounds. Gun regulation is not about banning guns, but about controlling who has access to them. As proposed by the President, background checks are essential when it comes to being able