Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Spending Clause
From the onset, it would be prudent to note that Congress has been granted the power, under the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), to lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defense and the general Welfare of the United States (Sedler 2019, 137). The Spending Clause further gives Congress the authority to require that, in exchange for federal funding, federal funds recipients implement certain policies or embrace various proposed actions. Thus, through this Clause, Congress can regulate the conduct of federal funds recipients by demanding that they adhere to certain requirements prior to their access of the said funds. It should however be noted that there are a number of constitutional limitations in as far as Congress deployment of funding conditions is concerned. It therefore follows that whether or not the Act is constitutional under this particular clause depends on a few factors.
To begin with, the funds recipient should be provided with a clear notice of what is expected of them in exchange for funds from the federal government. Further, the funds recipient should be furnished with a clear notice of the penalties that failure to comply would attract. In the...…i.e. by exploring other funding sources. As a consequence, state participation in this case cannot be deemed to have been coerced.
Lastly, the condition for funding should satisfy the various constitutional doctrines and must not run afoul of an independent constitutional bar. In our case, there is nothing in the condition for funding that, for instance, violates various individual freedoms as guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution.
In the final analysis, it should be noted that whereas the funding condition in this case does meet three of the listed standards, it fails on the relatedness account. Towards this end, under the Spending Clause, the Dont Text and…
References
Sedler, Robert. 2019. Constitutional Law in the United States. Philadelphia: Kluwer Law International.
Constitutional Originalism A living constitution is a concept that is found in the United States, it is also referred to as loose constitution. This is because it is a constitutional interpretation that the constitution is dynamic in meaning. It claims that the constitution has human properties since it constantly changes .I hold a strong opinion for the constitution to be interpreted as a living constitution due to several reasons. The idea
Constitutional Rights of Prisoners The hands off doctrine that existed throughout the United States through the 1960s was the notion that the law did not apply to prisoners. It Convicted offenders, who were incarcerated, were not eligible for the same rights that applied to liberated U.S. citizens. The doctrine mandated that prisoners had forfeited those rights when they were convicted of whatever crime they committed. This doctrine made it impossible for
Constitutional Law Debate: The Legislative Branch The Legislative Branch of government is the most powerful for many reasons. Of course, there would be people who would argue against that and state that other branches are more powerful because of specific powers that those branches possess. Despite that argument, the Legislative Branch of the U.S. Government clearly has more power because of the types of decisions that have been entrusted to them.
Kennedy referred to international as well as domestic standards in defense of the court's majority opinion. He wrote: "Our determination that the death penalty is disproportionate punishment for offenders under eighteen finds confirmation in the stark reality that the United States is the only country in the world that continues to give official sanction to the juvenile death penalty. This reality does not become controlling, for the task of
Constitutional Rules IS OUR CONSTITUTION A "LIVING" DOCUMENT? Americans are hugely proud of and greatly revere their Constitution, and so does the rest of the world stand in awe at the economic and political might of the United States in adherence to its Constitution. Founding Fathers poured out their highest and best during the Constitutional Convention held in 1787 in fashioning a most precious document (Patton 2000) that would define and establish
However, where a state statute exerts control over matters capable of being regulated by Congress under the Commerce Clause, those statutes are invalid because they conflict with a concept that is generally referred to as the "dormant Commerce Clause" (Dershowitz, 2002; Friedman, 2005). In modern application, federal courts apply a three-pronged test to determine whether or not a given state statute is invalid by virtue of a conflict with Congressional