Statistical Analysis With SPSS Linear Regression Models

PAGES
3
WORDS
1150
Cite

Run a linear regression of time spent studying (Study; independent) predicting time spent watching TV (TV; dependent). Copy and paste your output and answer the following questions. Regression

Descriptive Statistics

Mean

Deviation

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

Correlations

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

Pearson Correlation

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

Sig. (1-tailed)

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

.002

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

.002

N

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

50

50

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

50

50

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Method

1

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?b

Enter

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.397a

.158

.140

11.9242

a. Predictors: (Constant), How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

b. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

1

8.983

.004b

Residual

48

Total

49

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

b. Predictors: (Constant), How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

95.0% Confidence Interval for B

B

Std. Error

Beta

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

1

(Constant)

2.386

2.756

.866

.391

-3.156

7.927

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

.878

.293

.397

2.997

.004

.289

1.467

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

2.386

28.734

8.920

5.1055

50

Residual

-19.9511

56.2662

.0000

11.8019

50

Std. Predicted Value

-1.280

3.881

.000

1.000

50

Std. Residual

-1.673

4.719

.000

.990

50

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

1. Is the model good (statistically significant)? Write a sentence, using the proper format, describing the results of the ANOVA test.

The model is statistically significant as there is moderate correlation between how much time a student studies and how much time a student spends watching TV, as R = .397, p < 0.05.

2. Would it be appropriate to report the value of R-squared in the Model Summary? Why or why not? If yes, report and interpret. If no, write N/A.

Yes, it is meaningful at slightly less than 16% but it is not a great predictor. R-squared = .158.

3. Is time spent studying a statistically significant predictor of time spent watching TV according to the coefficients box? Write a sentence, using the proper format, describing the results.

Yes, the standardized beta is .397, p < 0.05 and is statistically significant.

4. Look at the b coefficient. By how much would we predict time spent watching TV to change for every 1 hour increase in time spent studying? Will it increase or decrease by this amount?

.878 hours increase

Task 2. Run a linear regression of time spent studying and time spent working (Study and Work; independents) predicting time spent watching TV (TV; dependent). Copy and paste...

...

Deviation
N

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

7.511

6.8211

47

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

6.638

4.6680

47

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

19.904

21.0451

47

Correlations

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

Pearson Correlation

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

1.000

-.164

-.013

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

-.164

1.000

.061

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

-.013

.061

1.000

Sig. (1-tailed)

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

.135

.466

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

.135

.343

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

.466

.343

N

How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

47

47

47

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

47

47

47

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

47

47

47

Variables Entered/Removeda

Model

Variables Entered

Variables Removed

Method

1

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?, How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?b

Enter

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

b. All requested variables entered.

Model Summaryb

Model

R

R Square

Adjusted R Square

Std. Error of the Estimate

1

.164a

.027

-.017

6.8794

a. Predictors: (Constant), How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?, How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

b. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

ANOVAa

Model

Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

Sig.

1

Regression

57.875

2

28.937

.611

.547b

Residual

2082.370

44

47.327

Total

46

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

b. Predictors: (Constant), How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?, How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

Coefficientsa

Model

Unstandardized Coefficients

Standardized Coefficients

t

Sig.

95.0% Confidence Interval for B

B

Std. Error

Beta

Lower Bound

Upper Bound

1

(Constant)

9.122

1.962

4.649

.000

5.167

13.077

How much time do you spend studying per week (in hours)?

-.240

.218

-.164

-1.103

.276

-.679

.199

How much time do you spend working per week (in hours)?

-.001

.048

-.003

-.019

.985

-.098

.096

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

Residuals Statisticsa

Minimum

Maximum

Mean

Std. Deviation

N

Predicted Value

4.295

9.099

7.511

1.1217

47

Residual

-7.9074

31.5980

.0000

6.7282

47

Std. Predicted Value

-2.867

1.416

.000

1.000

47

Std. Residual

-1.149

4.593

.000

.978

47

a. Dependent Variable: How much time do you spend watching TV per week (in hours)?

1. Is the model as a whole good (statistically significant)? Write a sentence, using the proper format, describing the results of the…

Cite this Document:

"Statistical Analysis With SPSS Linear Regression Models" (2016, December 05) Retrieved April 23, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statistical-analysis-with-spss-linear-regression-2163778

"Statistical Analysis With SPSS Linear Regression Models" 05 December 2016. Web.23 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statistical-analysis-with-spss-linear-regression-2163778>

"Statistical Analysis With SPSS Linear Regression Models", 05 December 2016, Accessed.23 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/statistical-analysis-with-spss-linear-regression-2163778

Related Documents

Statistical Analysis Reported in Two Journal Articles Research endeavors, albeit it clinical, empirical, descriptive, historical, or case study oriented, must at all times adhere to the rigors of effective or best-fit research practice. Without stringent controls placed on the area of investigation no research endeavor will advance any body of knowledge. To this end all research must be finely tuned and described as to intent or purpose, phenomenon to be

86 34.00 additive 2 9 11.33 Total 16 Test Statisticsb gas mileage Mann-Whitney U 6.000 Wilcoxon W 34.000 Z -2.701 Asymp. Sig. (2-tailed) .007 Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] .005a a. Not corrected for ties. b. Grouping Variable: fuel additives (per m) P (1) 0.004 P (2) 0.008 With the two P. values being so far apart, as well as the variance of the two groups being of significant value, around 2 whole values, it is clear that there is a significant difference to be noted between the two sample groups. Through the analysis of both

Thus, the researchers concluded that environmental factors were part of the overall equation, determined by comparing the amount of phthalates in those girls who live close to urban areas with factories that manufacture products containing phthalates. One other finding drawn from this sample group was that the levels of phthalates "were significantly higher than the average levels" determined by the CDC (Lee, 2009, Internet). With the second group of four

Statistical Techniques Introduction Statistics is defined as a methodology of gathering data, analyzing it, understanding the data and forming appropriate conclusions from the analysis. Not many subjects are as broad or have as many important applications as statistics (Wooldridge & Jeffrey, 2013). Mathematicians, scientists and researchers in general rely on statistics to interpret the information they collect or encounter in their specific fields of work. In general, nearly everything that covers the collection,

Regression, Correlation: Effect of IQ on GPA Effective teaching begins with understanding the thinking and reasoning abilities of one's students and devising ways to ensure that the classroom setting is accommodative of the inherent differences in cognitive capabilities and that all students get to benefit from the learning process. One way of measuring a child's intellectual ability is by administering the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children -- Forth Edition (WISC-IV), which

Correlation & Regression A fifth grade science teacher wants to know if there is a relationship between final exam scores and overall coursepoints after adjusting for a quiz score. In order to determine whether there was a significant relationship between overall coursepoints and final exam scores, after controlling for quiz scores, a hierarchical regression was run. All assumptions were assessed using SPSS. There was independences of residuals, as assessed by a Durbin-Watson