One can imagine a film including dream sequences to illustrate the liberating and sustaining power of the life of the imagination for a young and resilient woman. Then, finally, like escaping from an old-time war film, the captive family dug a tunnel and escaped. They were recaptured but the world was at least alerted to their plight. Their publicized effort lead to improved circumstances in their captivity, although Malika still did not leave her nation freely until many years afterwards.
Malika's tale is a tale of a fall from Eden, followed by survival -- a narrative made for the movies, and Oufkir as a young girl did dream of becoming a movie star. The true, most unsavory aspects of her narrative, like the reality of living in a brutal Moroccan prison ridden with human rights violations might be too real, however, even for film. Also, the authoritarian regime that allowed Oufkir's family to be punished for the transgressions of her father, while condemned in the book, might be difficult to contextualize in the medium of the cinema if the film was solely told from the family's perspective.
Putting Oufkir's subjective memoir on screen, though, and using additional historical sources might actually contain some advantages not possessed by the nature of the woman's memoir. A memoir can only encapsulate one person's experience and perceptions. Oufkir's is a tale of victimization, a stolen life, to use the title of her book. But according to one reviewer who lived in Morocco, Oufkir's father perpetrated terrible, similar crimes upon others while he was in power. The reviewer had lived in Morocco in the 1980s, around the time of the end of the Oufkir's captivity and subsequent escape: "Malika says...
Our semester plans gives you unlimited, unrestricted access to our entire library of resources —writing tools, guides, example essays, tutorials, class notes, and more.
Get Started Now