Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
¶ … Shooting an Elephant," deconstructs many different notions about the concept of free will. Actually, free will concept is at the crux of this essay, which is about a young police officer (Orwell) in British occupied India who is called to stop an elephant which has gotten loose. The author expressly states in a number of different places that he does not want to have to shoot the elephant; moreover, when he comes upon the elephant the animal is acting peacefully. However, a large crowd of people has gathered about him, which largely compels him to murder the elephant. A thorough analysis of this essay indicates that the primary conflict is between that of the will of the officer and that of the will of the crowd. A prolonged examination into the factors that lead the officer to shoot the elephant unequivocally indicate that he did not have free will in slaying the beast, and that he was acting in accordance with the will of the crowd.
The principal reason that Orwell is not exercising free will when he shoots the elephant is because his own volition is effectively overridden by that of the crowd. Although there are numerous instances in the text that indicate this fact, a look at the definition of free will and its requirements in Stace's text "Is Determinism Inconsistent...
Stace's text (1999) states, "If a man's actions were wholly determined by chains of causes stretching back into the remote past, so that they could be predicted beforehand by a mind which knew all the causes, it could be assumed that he could not in that case be free" (710). This definition indicates that if one's actions are determined by causes in the distant past so that they are predictable, then one is not exercising free will. Such a definition applies to Orwell and his decision to shoot the elephant, which is fueled by the imperialist tendencies of the British -- which he represents to a large, Indian crowd. That is why Orwell writes that, "As I stood there with the rifle in my hands ... I first grasped the hollowness, the futility of the white man's dominion in the East" (Orwell). That "futility" is based on the fact that the imperialist must always act like the authoritative imperialist in front of the colonized people, which is ultimately why Orwell shoots the elephant. He does so because of the imperialist chain of events he is propagating and not because of his own free will, according to the definition offered by Stace.
Additionally, an examination of the…
Works Cited
Orwell, George. "Shooting an Elephant." www.online-literature.org . 1939. Web. http://www.online-literature.com/orwell/887/
Stale, Walter T. "Is Determinism Inconsistent with Free Will?" Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Ed. Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. New York: St. Martin's. 1999. Print.
Crowd-Sourcing Service User Funding for Participation in Educational Conferences Reporting on the Joint World Social Work conference held in Melbourne, Australia, Peter Beresford wrote, "There are fears that policymakers have lost interest in ensuring the users of care services have their voices heard" (2014). Social workers established the involvement of service users and carers as a key priority in social service, pioneering efforts to forward user involvement on an international level
Despite historical evidence, the crowd management science of mathematicians and engineers tends to assume that crowds of people have a herd mentality that precludes crowds using rational judgment. Yet the tragedy of September 11, 2001, tells many stories of people behaving in an orderly fashion, to maximize the chance that more lives would be saved. The media has created an image of 'mob panic' -- such as panic buying at
By identifying with the crowd, the individual is freed from responsibility for his or her actions, and thus is more likely to engage in violent behavior (or at a minimum, feels more comfortable engaging in said behavior). However, this does not fully account for violent crowds, because even if individuals gain anonymity through the crowd and thus are free to engage in violent behavior, one must explain just how
The convoluted relationships that characterize much of the novel are an example of a madding crowd, not distance from it. Also, Hardy describes how industrialization and urbanization are changing rural life at a pace at which they may be beginning to converge. The madding crowd is infiltrating the peaceful pastoral landscapes, while the people of the fields are finding it harder and harder to find employment practicing their traditional ways
Friends From the Wrong Crowd One of the most challenging things among the young people on America is the idea of bad company. This problem is so pronounced and serious taking into account that the people who surround and individual largely dictates the direction of the life that the individual will take and hence shaping their future. Ryan a 23 years old boy came from a humble Christian family where no one
Gone Too FarBola Agbaje\\\'s play \\\"Gone Too Far!\\\" is a title that encapsulates the essence of the narrative while subtly hinting at the underlying themes of racial and ethnic tension. The title can be interpreted as a reflection of the point at which societal and personal conflicts, arising from racial and ethnic differences, have escalated beyond a manageable level. It suggests a moment of critical confrontation where underlying issues can