Toyota, Ford, Gm, And Volkswagen SWOT

PAGES
4
WORDS
1105
Cite

It does not want to be left out of a potential boom entirely, even if it is skeptical. Opportunities

As well as the opportunity to become a part of the online marketplace, Toyota also has an opportunity to cut costs in one of its weaker markets where it still wishes to retain a visible presence. Toyota is in negotiations with the German automaker Volkswagen so it can standardize more components and cut operating costs in Europe. But there is a problem of defining what constitutes a standardized product.

VW thinks that 20-30 parts may be standardized, but unsurprisingly Toyota considers a wider range of parts competitive, such as steering wheels and wire connectors.

Threats

Steering wheels and wire connectors on the surface do not seem to be competitive components, although Toyota sees competition as taking place on a part-by-part basis, as well as on a holistic basis. Every crucial aspect of design at Toyota is given consideration and attention. Yet without some compromise it could lose its ability to cut costs and remain competitive in Europe, and also lose out in the potential cost-savings of participating on the Internet marketplace.

Best Option

The best option seems to allow for more standardization in Europe, but to hold fast to the negotiating position in the U.S.

Defend the option or recommendation selected

Toyota is currently at the top of the market in the U.S. so it might be best not to concede too much to rivals, given that it has more to lose from the Internet site (such as its good relations with suppliers) than either Ford or GM. The American...

...

Some agreement on standardization might be wise in the European market, where it has less dominance. But regarding its negotiations with GM, since it is operating from a position of strength, conceding too much to the American auto manufacturer would be unwise and unnecessary, given the quality relationship Toyota has with its major suppliers.
Summary comments

Although a cost savings through competition would be nice, Toyota ultimately has more to lose than to gain by alienating itself from its currently strong relationships with suppliers. Its component parts in Europe may be less unique that it might believe, but this attentiveness to detail is part of its company philosophy.

Conclusion

Toyota has been a mold-breaker since its inception, and has won market dominance by thinking outside of the American box, using the Japanese strategy of cultivating relationships rather than conventional competition to gain its current market dominance. Suppliers cut costs out of a desire to maintain contracts with this number one company, rather than fear of competition. Instead of trying to follow an older American model of competition at all costs, Toyota should continue to do what it does best, and perhaps consider reducing its focus on Europe, or totally rethink its marketing approach in other areas, than accept its rival's conceptions of quality, supplier relationships, and the unique nature of its car components. Some agreement with VW would be nice, but there are other ways it might consider exploring to cut costs before even making a few concessions.

Cite this Document:

"Toyota Ford Gm And Volkswagen" (2008, April 27) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/toyota-ford-gm-and-volkswagen-30317

"Toyota Ford Gm And Volkswagen" 27 April 2008. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/toyota-ford-gm-and-volkswagen-30317>

"Toyota Ford Gm And Volkswagen", 27 April 2008, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/toyota-ford-gm-and-volkswagen-30317

Related Documents

TOYOTA'S PRIUS With the increased level of awareness of the environment, automotive car manufacturers vie on the viability of selling environmentally hybrid cars. Leading this group are Honda and Toyota. The following is a market analysis of the position of Toyota's Prius. It analyzes the following factors: Situation of the firm in the market The industry of hybrid cars The strategy adopted by Prius and how it is faring in the market The barriers of

Ford Motor Company was the only one of America's Big Three automakers to turn down government assistance in 2009. The company wanted to maintain its independence, and believed that the strategies that were in place were going to be sufficient to bring about the financial recovery of the firm. In the past couple of years, the company has revamped its product line, cut its expenses, and sought to take advantage

Ford World Automobile Industry 2009 Which companies are likely to be most successful over the next five years? The companies likely to experience the greatest market success in the coming years are those that find a way to simultaneously innovate and, in the case of the Detroit Big 3 especially, find intuitive ways to reduce their capacity. Something that the case study published in the text by Grant (2009) makes quite clear

GM and Peugeot Merger With the current economic trends that many multinationals are caught up in especially after the global recession, many opt for alternative ways to survive in the market as well as alternative markets. This drive to venture into other markets has seen many of the multinationals and big businesses venture into alliances and mergers that would see them have a footing in varied economic settings hence supporting their

Ford Motor Company is facing the challenge of a changing external environment in the long-run. In the short-run, business will continue more or less as usual, but in the medium to long run the company faces technological changes that will make electric cars mainstream, and will introduce driverless cars to the roadways, which will be a transformative development for society, one that might only be a couple of years away

Toyota, Ford, Gm, and Volkswagen -- Some Differing Opinions About Working With Suppliers A) Summarize the case and outline all of the issues The crux of the case pits how four of the major automobile manufacturers differ in their operations about working with suppliers and their definitions of what constitutes competitive, as opposed to standardized automotive parts between manufactures. Some automakers see their suppliers as partners, such as Toyota. Others see suppliers