¶ … trainee solicitor with the firm Dewey Cheetham & Howe. The secretary has made an appointment with an Arthur Morris who wants to speak to a solicitor about being injured in a road accident riding as a passenger in a car that rolled on the Logon Motorway in Queensland two months ago. Both the passenger (Morris) and the driver of the car had been drinking.
(1) When did the accident occur?
This question is very important based on the Limitations of Actions Act 1974, which states that in the majority types of legal action there are "time periods known as limitations periods within which cases must be commenced." (Limitations of Actions Act 1974) Failure to commence proceedings within the allotted limitation period will bar the action from being taken and make the action subject to "possible suspension or extension of the period, or the other side failing to take issue." (Limitations of Actions Act 1974 ) The statutes of limitations exist for two primary reasons:
(1) Injustice -- proceedings hanging over the heads of defendants for long periods of time would result in injustice due to the memories of witnesses having faded and other such factors; and (2) Efficiency -- litigants should be encouraged to bring their actions within a period of time that is reasonable. (Limitations of Actions Act 1974)
Reasons cited by the Courts for supporting the statute of limitations existence include:
(1) Plaintiffs with good causes of action pursue them with reasonable diligence;
(2) Defendant might have lost evidence to disprove a state claim; and (3) Long dormant claims have more cruelty than justice in them. (Limitations of Actions Act 1974)
The statute of limitation period generally begins "upon accrual of the cause of action and is stopped by the commencement of the proceedings. If proceedings are not commenced...
There are instance in which the plaintiff can seek a time extension.
Question Two
(2) Were the police notified of the accident?
Importance of Question
The Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 -- Section 34: Duty to Notify Accidents to Policy states:
"that anyone who is to make a motor vehicle accident claim must ensure that appropriate notice of the accident has been given to a police officer." (Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994) Included as element of appropriate notice of motor vehicle accident are the following:
(a) the report of particulars required under the Transport Operations (Road Use Management -- Road Rules) Regulation 1999, section 287; or (b) if (and only if) particulars have not been reported as required under that section -- a notice under this section in a form approved by the commission. (Motor Accident Insurance Act, 1994 -- Sect 34) (Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994)
Question Three
(3) Was the driver of the vehicle covered by automobile insurance?
Importance of Question
The Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994 Schedule -- Policy of Insurance 1 Extent of Insurance Cover reports that the insurance policy "insures against liability for personal injury caused by, through or in connection with the insured motor vehicle anywhere in Australia." (Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994) However, the policy is such that does not "insure a person (the injured person) against injury, damage or loss -- (a) that arises independently of any wrongful act or omission; or (b) (b) to the extent that the injury loss or damage is attributable to the injured person's own wrongful act or omission." (Motor Accident Insurance Act 1994) Also stated is that the policy "does not insure against…
Civil Liability of Security Personnel MOONLIGHTING Current statistics reveal that private security personnel are twice the number of public law enforcers (Moore, 1987). Of utmost consideration is that these private security personnel are put in charge of, and authorized to, protect the lives and property of customers. They need to realize the magnitude of this responsibility. And without adequate training, that realization is hardly possible. They are not law enforcers or peace
Civil Liability The issue of the use of force and civil liability amongst police officers has been the subject of debate for many ears. The Rodney King trial and subsequent riots brought a great deal of attention to the excessive use of force and the justice system. In the years since the Rodney King case, there have been many incidents of excessive force. The use of force and civil liability is problematic
Civil Liability Associated With Policing Civil liability and policing The law enforcement agencies and their officers are widely trusted for upholding the law and implementing the requirements of the law as well as protecting the innocent citizens from those who may want to break the law. However, several instances have seen the law enforcement agencies or officer fall in the trap of facing litigation. Civil liability remains a concern within American policing
Police civil liability is one of the more complex areas of civil law. Because of their unique position in society, police officers have to be free to engage in behavior that would be tortious if it was committed by people outside of law enforcement. However, that same unique societal position means that those in law enforcement are given opportunities to abuse power that others do not have. The apparent dichotomy
Civil versus Criminal Liability Introduction Criminal justice practitioners do have a civil liability that puts them at risk of being sued by the public. The purpose of civil liability is to encourage accountability and responsible in the field of criminal justice. For that reason, “local governments can now be held liable for the conduct of police officers and jail personnel. In addition, sheriffs, police chiefs, and mid- level supervisors can be held
Civil Law Tort Law Tort law deals with causing personal injury or harm to another in a non-criminal manner. Negligence is the most often cause for violations of tort law. Private security officers need to understand this concept due to the unique nature of their job. Negligence can be claimed if reasonable care is not taken by the officer in the course of his duties. As an authority figure, reasonable care is