Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Validity in research is a term that refers to the extent with which researchers are confident that they have determined causal relationships through the cause and effect they identify in their study. As a result, validity is an important aspect of research since it helps in determining whether the research design is flawed and the credibility of research findings. There are various kinds of validity that are utilized in determining the validity of quantitative studies including internal validity, external validity, statistical conclusion validity, and constructs validity. Polit & Beck (2012) suggests that researchers attempt to ensure validity of their studies through maintaining adequate control over confounding variables.
The Study
Padula, Hughes & Baumhover (2009) conducted a study in which they examined the effect of nurse-driven mobility protocol on functional deterioration in hospitalized older adults. This quasi-experimental study was carried out on the premise that functional status is an important aspect of the health, wellbeing, and quality of life of older adults. The researcher utilized a non-equivalent control group design in which dependent variables were hospital length of stay and functional status whereas mobility control was the independent variable.
Potential Concerns Regarding the Study’s Internal Validity
One of the potential concerns that could be raised...
This is a potential concern since the researchers selected the subjects in a non-random manner i.e. through convenience sampling. In this regard, the study’s findings are likely to be biased when comparing the treatment and control group during data analysis. Secondly, instrumentation could also be a potential concern regarding the study’s internal validity. The researchers utilized GENESIS program as the intervention, which implies that the use of another intervention could generate different results. Changes in the instrumentation would impact what is being measured in the study and how the evaluation is carried out. The third potential concern that could be raised regarding the study’s internal validity is experimental mortality given that a significant number of eligible subjects who were enrolled for the study withdrew. These subjects dropped for several reasons including illness-associated anxiety, which implies that loss of participants could have impact on the study’s findings.
Recommendations to Strengthen Internal Validity
Given these potential concerns regarding the study’s internal concerns and their potential impact on the study’s findings, it’s important to strengthen the research’s internal validity. First, the study…
References
Padula, C. A., Hughes, C., & Baumhover, L. (2009). Impact of a Nurse-driven Mobility Protocol on Functional Decline in Hospitalized Older Adults. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 24(4), 325–331.
Polit, D.F. & Beck, C.T. (2012). Nursing research: generating and assessing evidence for nursing practice (9th ed.). China: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Validity in Quantitative Research Designs Validity Quantitative Research Designs Validity research refers extent researchers confident effect identify research fact causal relationships. If low validity a study, means research design flawed results . Threats to internal validity in quasi-experimental designs Quasi-experimental studies have several issues that lead to lack of internal validity of the study. These occur as a result of the experimental conditions not being highly controlled or randomized. This leads to intervention
Validity, in essence, has got to do with the extent to which a given research study measures the accuracy of a specific concept – effectively meaning that a study can be said to have passed the validity test if it accurately mirrors that which the researchers set about to investigate. In quantitative research, as Polit and Beck (2012) point out, “researchers strive to design studies that are strong with respect
Strengths/Weaknesses of the Quantitative ApproachIntroductionQuantitative research is a widely used approach in public administration research that involves the collection and analysis of numerical data. This approach has several strengths, including the ability to use probability sampling methods to select representative samples, the ability to replicate studies to verify findings, and the ability to collect large amounts of data quickly and efficiently. However, there are also limitations to quantitative research, such
Research Methodologies and Implications for Modern Businesses Today, two of the primary methods of collecting relevant information and interpreting it in unique ways to benefit business operations are qualitative and quantitative methodologies. Although these two research methodologies share some commonalities, they both differ in terms of what types of data is used for analysis and how the resulting analysis is applied in real-world settings. The purpose of this signature assignment is
Quantitative Research Critique Part I Introduction It is important to note, from the onset, that the health and wellbeing of women is often impacted upon negatively by intimate partner violence (IPV). In the past, various research studies have attempted to not only assess the impact of IPV on the health and wellbeing of women, but also the strategies that ought to be implemented in seeking to care for victims of IPV. In
Assessing the quality of quantitative research Question 1: Study purpose/question (a) Did the study have a clearly stated purpose/research question? Yes (b) Explain your response below: The study was designed to evaluate the feasibility of the mobile service so as to determine the most suitable sample size and to refine