Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Variable vs. Absorption Costing
Whether to use variable or absorption costing would depend on the type of decisions the information is being evaluated for. Variable costing provides a better understanding of the effects of fixed costs, allows better understanding and ease in using cost control methods, provides information for CVP (cost volume profit analysis), and is closer to cash flows (Variable costing vs. absorption costing, 2012). Absorption costing is used in financial statements, recognizes importance of fixed costs, and shows less fluctuation in net profit when sales or production volumes fluctuate (Advantages and Disadvantages of Absorption Costing System, 2012).
Decisions for competitor pricing is best evaluated under the variable costing to ensure that all costs are paid in a timely manner. Also, decisions based on controlling inventory and production volumes or determining cash flow would best be made with variable costing. Absorption costing can be used for decisions concerning the effects of the fixed costs on financial statement calculations. Each method has its own purpose, benefits, and limitations and are best used in combination based on the decisions at hand to be made.
For the case of Montana Company, the variable product costs are $82,440 (14,490 + 25,530 + 32,420 + 10,000) where the absorption product costs are $72,440 (14,490 + 25,530 + 32,420). If a competitor is submitting a lower bid on product, the variable costing would lead to the best decision to determine an appropriate competitive price. The variable costing represents all costs involved in producing the product and can also evaluate for appropriate cash flow that would be needed for operations.
The absorption costing would be appropriate for the financial statement calculations to determine the product and period costs in determining the net income for the period. If the sales volume fluctuated from one period to another, it would show less in the financial statements. The same goes if the production volumes fluctuated and sales were constant. The absorption shows a more even costs from one period to another. The decisions that need to be made will dictate which costing method is better used to generate appropriate information to make an informed decision.
Bibliography
Advantages and Disadvantages of Absorption Costing System. (2012). Retrieved from Accounting for Management: http://www.accounting4management.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-absorption_costing.htm
Variable costing vs. absorption costing. (2012). Retrieved from Accountingformanagement.org: http://www.accountingformanagement.org/variable-vs.-absorption-costing/
Absorption costing is a costing method which treats all costs of production as product costs without considering whether these costs are variable or fixed (AccountingforManagement, 2013). Under the absorption costing method the cost of a unit product comprises direct materials, direct labor, and both variable and fixed overhead. This costing method allocates a portion of fixed manufacturing cost to each unit of a product along with the variable manufacturing cost
Dibsa should turn towards the market-based pricing strategy, which sees the implementation of competitive prices for the 3-in-1 Lawnmower. The selection of this combination of strategies would generate several impacts upon the company, but most of them would be obvious at product lifecycle level. In this order of ideas: The sales revenues would be significantly high throughout the first six months and they would allow the company to cover for
Managerial Accounting for Sleepease Ltd. "Identify, discuss and critically evaluate the advantages and problems of using the following costing methods for internal reporting purposes": absorption costing; marginal costing. "Refer to the Sleepease case as and when necessary" absorption costing The absorption costing is the type of managerial costing where both the variable and fixed costs are charged to process or product. Thus, "absorption costing is a method for appraising or valuing a firm's total inventory
Managerial accounting, there are different types of costing that can be used. Each method of costing has its advantages and disadvantages in different situations. It must be remembered, when determining what the best type of costing method is, that the objective of managerial accounting is to deliver useful information that can assist in managerial decision-making. Thus, managerial accounting matters to the extent that it can help to deliver on overall
Costing Financial Accounting-Variable Costing How is managerial accounting different from financial accounting? Managerial Accounting refers to the processes in application by the company or business organization to identify, measure, analyze, interpret, and communicate vital information in relation to pursuing the mission, objectives, goals, and vision of the entity. Managerial Accounting is also the cost accounting. Financial Accounting is the act of providing relevant information on the financial position and performance of the
2. In your opinion, would stakeholders benefit from external reports that use variable costing for reporting? Give examples. Variable costing is a costing method under which those costs of production that vary in relation to output are treated as product costs, it is commonly compared to absorption costing which is a method that treats all production costs as product costs regardless whether they are fixed or variable. Using variable costing can