Why Parental Love For A Child Should Be Unconditional Chapter

PAGES
2
WORDS
747
Cite

¶ … Merit: Reflection David Brooks (2015) makes a valid point in his New York Times article "Love and Merit." His aim is to show that parental love is more important and effective than meritocratic love. The difference between the two is that the former is unconditional and gives the child the sense that he or she is loved no matter what -- even if he or she fails at everything the child attempts, the parent still loves the child. Meritocratic love, on the other hand, is based the child's success at various tasks, whether school, sports, or sociality. Meritocratic love, Brooks argues, reinforces the wrong ideas in the child -- namely, that the child is only valuable so long as he performs well. But this notion sets up a false idea within society. It props up a person's sense of self-worth by gauging the person's value according to standards that do not transcend to the higher realm of truth, beauty, goodness and love. Love, Brooks argues, especially from a parent, should be akin to charity: it should not judge or be discriminatory. It should see goodness everywhere it looks. Children, Brooks suggests, need such unconditional...

...

If the love they receive is only meritocratic then they will always feel a pressure to perform and never really understand what real love is all about.
Thus, this article is significant in the sense that it drives home a major point about love and how it should be shown. Love should not be "a tool to exercise control," so Brooks contends. It should be something that comes out of a parent's heart without respect to what a child does. Whether a child is good or bad should make no difference on how a parent displays love. Love that is rooted in the "culture of meritocracy" is not real love -- it is a manipulation, an exploitation of love for an end that is situated within the parent's conception or within a societal conception of the way a child should be. But who says why that conception is good? What if it isn't? And why should a parent's love be conditional upon adherence to this conception? As Brooks notes, "parental love is supposed to be oblivious to achievement." What he means is that love is really most efficacious when it is blind. And when it…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Brooks, D. (2015). Love and Merit. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/opinion/david-brooks-love-and-merit.html?smid=pl-share

Shakespeare, W. (n.d.). "Sonnet 116." Shakespeare Online. Retrieved from http://www.shakespeare-online.com/sonnets/116.html


Cite this Document:

"Why Parental Love For A Child Should Be Unconditional" (2016, March 31) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-parental-love-for-a-child-should-be-2156705

"Why Parental Love For A Child Should Be Unconditional" 31 March 2016. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-parental-love-for-a-child-should-be-2156705>

"Why Parental Love For A Child Should Be Unconditional", 31 March 2016, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/why-parental-love-for-a-child-should-be-2156705

Related Documents

Moreover, it is unclear whether Jim has attempted to reestablish any meaningful contact with his children; rather, his entire focus has been on becoming a better person. While there is certainly nothing wrong with that goal in and of itself (it is, after all, a universal human quality), he appears to have pursued this goal to the total exclusion of making any substantive reparations to his family. Finally, it is

Adopting a special needs child also presents strong demands on time and energy that "normal" families do not usually have to deal with. According to Cloud and Townshend (2001) "As a rule, children don't know what they are doing. They have little idea how to handle life so that it works right. That's why God gave them parents - to love them, give them structure and guide them into maturity"

Thus while the father is meant to be resting from a difficult work week, he is instead caring for his family. It is important to note the two places in the poem where the reader can see that the narrator has the benefit of hindsight in evaluating his father's good deeds. The first is at the end of the first stanza, where the narrator states "No one ever thanked him"

Those discussions eventually allowed the client to realize that, for her part, she would not necessarily have worried very much about marital status had the same situation occurred after she had lost her parents, or in the alternative, if her parents had never expressed such acute concern about it. During that discussion, the therapist was careful to steer the client away from the conclusion that she caused Carlos to start

The objective is always to quell escalating hostilities, while still forcing the child to show respect to others. To further persuade the reader, Omer provides a case example of a child who has benefitted from the 'sit in' technique: an isolated, verbally and physically abusive twelve-year-old who lashed out at his parents, young sister, and schoolmates, and who also showed tendencies of OCD. Omer notes that the sit-in was not

S., experts estimate the genuine number of incidents of abuse and neglect ranges three times higher than reported. (National Child Abuse Statistics, 2006) in light of these critical contemporary concerns for youth, this researcher chose to document the application of Object Relation, Attachment Theories, and Self-Psychology to clinical practice, specifically focusing on a patient who experienced abuse when a child. Consequently, this researcher contends this clinical case study dissertation proves