William Wundt And Experimental Psychology Thesis

Titchener was aware of the possible effects of bias, as well as of faulty memory, on introspection. But he believed that the problem with bias can be remedied by preparing relatively simple tasks, by exercising strict standardization, and by extensively repeating the task within and between subjects. As for the problem with faulty memory, Titchener acknowledged that introspection is the similar with retrospection. Titchener's version of introspection is similar to Wundt's idea of self-observation. And since Wundt denied self-observation a spot in his laboratory because of its being highly susceptible to bias, he also rejected Titchener's systematic experiment introspection. Caution must be exercised to avoid taking Wundt's introspection to be a single idea, instead of it being split to internal perception and self-observation. Caveat, also, in taking Wundt's introspection and Titchener's systematic experiment introspection to be the same.

Wundt used introspection (specifically internal perception) as a primary tool in his then-newly-established experimental psychology since it provided a way to tap an individuals' cognition - an entity not directly observable, and was once thought by some to be impossible to observe. Introspection served as a tool in understanding mental processes,...

...

With introspection, it became possible to scrutinize not only the physical event, but also the event's mental counterpart.
Because of introspection, much insight has been gathered regarding the human mind and how it works. Introspection triggered more studies and thus, resulted to a wealth literature. Some studies have set forth to provide support to introspection, while others to highlight its weaknesses and limitations. Whichever is the case, it cannot be denied that introspection spawned more research works and served as basis for more tools in understanding the human mind; thus, taking knowledge to greater heights. Thanks to William Wundt, for believing and showing the world that Experimental Psychology is a valid field of Psychology.

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Davis, Stephen F. (Ed.). (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Experimental Psychology. Malden, UK: MA Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Reiber, R.W. & Robinson, D.K. (Eds.). (2001). Wilhelm Wundt in History: The Making of a Scientific Psychology. NY: Kluwer Academic Publishing.

David, Zehr. (2000). Portrayals of Wundt and Tichener in introductory psychology texts: a content analysis. Teaching of Psychology, 27 (2), 122-126.


Cite this Document:

"William Wundt And Experimental Psychology" (2008, November 23) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-wundt-and-experimental-psychology-26512

"William Wundt And Experimental Psychology" 23 November 2008. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-wundt-and-experimental-psychology-26512>

"William Wundt And Experimental Psychology", 23 November 2008, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/william-wundt-and-experimental-psychology-26512

Related Documents

Behavioral activities are more of reactions to stimuli and have less to do with cognitive (or brain) processes and more to do with how one acts in a certain environment. Some behavioral activities would include: 1) sitting quietly while in the classroom or in church; 2) opening the door for somebody to walk in ahead of you; 3) using good manners while at a restaurant; 4) helping an old

Whereas the behaviorist and psychodynamic models contradict each other in their fundamental assumptions and focus, humanistic perspective does not necessarily contradict behaviorism or the psychodynamic approach, except that it considers both of those views as explanations of only portions of human behavior rather than all human behavior. The Cognitive Perspective: The Cognitive perspective broadens the study of human psychology even further than the humanistic perspective. In addition to considering all of the

Evolution of Cognitive Psychology A discipline in the field of psychology, cognitive psychology examines the way people process information. This field achieves this goal by examining how humans treat information that they receive through stimuli and how their treatment of information contributes to certain responses. Therefore, the professionals in this field generally study people's internal processes like perception, language, attention, thinking, and memory. Cognitive psychology is based on the concept that

clinical psychology as a distinct pursuit and profession emerged in the late nineteenth century. However, a "climate of ideas receptive to the development of clinical psychology" emerged as early as the late 18th century (Reisman, 1976, p. vii). Clinical psychology perspectives reflected trends in Enlightenment thinking and the rise of the scientific method as a primary means of investigating reality. Enlightenment issues like individualism underlie much of clinical psychology.

Clinical Psychology / Bulimia Nervosa The beginnings of clinical psychology date back to the year 1492, and it has changed from the mere treatment of mental illness to an entire field of research and experimentation, which has helped those individuals who have been affected by any form of mental disorders, like for example, the eating disorders like bulimia nervosa and anorexia nervosa prevalent among adolescent and twenty-year-old women all over the

They developed several laws and principles to describe human experiences and perceptions. The cognitive movement was pioneered by the works of Chomsky and Piaget and focused on the role of cognition in relation with the outer environment (which provides input for information processing) and behavior. The most important findings so far regard the components of visual perception, the most important stages of development (according to Piaget), how do most of