This paper examines a case study in which an employer named John Jones commits multiple violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) during his hiring process. Beginning with an unlawfully worded job advertisement and continuing through discriminatory interview conduct and a lesser job offer, the paper traces each specific ADEA violation. It explains the legal standards employers must meet, including the prohibition against age-based stereotyping and the requirement to evaluate applicants as individuals. The paper concludes that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission would likely side with the applicant, Jim Smith, based on the cumulative evidence of age-based bias.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) protects individuals who are 40 years of age or older from employment discrimination based on age (Facts about age discrimination, 1997). Under the ADEA, it is unlawful to discriminate against a person because of his or her age with respect to any term, condition, or privilege of employment. This discussion reveals that John's requirement for a young man to perform heavy lifting constitutes a violation of the ADEA.
John Jones was on the wrong side of the ADEA from the very beginning when he posted his help-wanted advertisement. The ADEA makes it unlawful to include age preferences, limitations, or specifications in job notices or advertisements (Facts about age discrimination, 1997). Because John used the qualifier "young" in his job description, he placed illegal limitations on the pool of applicants.
It is clear that John obtained the age of the applicant, Jim, either on the application form or during the interview. The ADEA does not specifically prohibit an employer from asking an applicant's age or date of birth. However, if an employer does ask for an applicant's age, that inquiry must be made only for a lawful purpose — not one forbidden by the ADEA (Facts about age discrimination, 1997). In this instance, obtaining Jim's age may certainly be considered implied discrimination given the various other circumstances present in this case, and it would strengthen Jim's claim of age discrimination.
John violated the ADEA when he wrote "is qualified, but appears to be out of physical shape" on Jim's application. Furthermore, John told Jim that he wanted younger men who had the stamina needed for work in a lumber yard. The ADEA requires employers to consider applicants as individuals and to avoid stereotypical assumptions (The hiring process: FAQs, 2002). Although John's job does require heavy lifting, he cannot express a preference for younger males based on the stereotyped belief that older men are weaker than younger ones.
"Interview statements reflect illegal age stereotyping"
"Lesser job offer compounds ADEA violations"
The hiring process: FAQs. (2002). Retrieved November 30, 2004, from FindLaw Web site:
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.