Age Discrimination and BPD Under ADEA and ADA Law
This paper analyzes two employment discrimination scenarios through the lens of federal anti-discrimination law. The first scenario examines whether a laid-off sales employee can successfully argue age discrimination under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), weighing statistical evidence against performance-based justifications for the termination. The second scenario considers whether borderline personality disorder (BPD) qualifies as a protected disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), distinguishing personality disorders from learning disabilities and evaluating an employer's right to select candidates based on job-relevant personal characteristics. Both scenarios draw on EEOC guidelines to assess the strength and limits of each potential claim.
- Introduction to Workplace Discrimination Law: Overview of ADEA and ADA legal frameworks
- Scenario 1: Age Discrimination Under the ADEA: Schwager's termination assessed against ADEA standards
- Evaluating the Statistical and Contextual Evidence: Statistical age data weighed against performance evidence
- Scenario 2: BPD and ADA Coverage: Whether BPD qualifies as ADA-protected disability
- Conclusion: Summary of both discrimination claim analyses
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- It applies specific statutory language — from both the ADEA and the ADA — directly to each scenario, grounding the analysis in actual legal standards rather than general assertions.
- It acknowledges the strongest counterargument in each scenario (e.g., Schwager's statistical evidence, the pension liability reduction) before explaining why those arguments ultimately fall short.
- It draws a clear conceptual distinction between a learning disability (dyslexia) and a personality disorder (BPD), making the ADA analysis more precise and credible.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates issue-spotting and burden-of-proof analysis, a core technique in legal writing. Rather than simply stating a conclusion, the author identifies what each claimant would need to prove, then tests the available evidence against that standard. This approach mirrors how legal memos and case analyses are structured in law and business ethics courses.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as a two-scenario response. Each scenario opens with the relevant federal statute, defines the applicable legal standard, presents the factual evidence, and then evaluates whether that evidence meets the legal threshold. The ADEA scenario receives more extended treatment, examining geographic, positional, and performance-related variables a plaintiff would need to correlate. The ADA scenario is more conceptually focused, hinging on the definitional boundary between disability and personality disorder.
Introduction to Workplace Discrimination Law
Federal anti-discrimination statutes define the boundaries of lawful employment decisions in the United States. Two key laws — the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) — establish protections that employers must observe when hiring, retaining, or terminating employees. The following scenarios apply both statutes to specific employment situations, assessing the strength of potential discrimination claims under each.
Works Cited
EEOC. (2005). Federal laws prohibiting discrimination: Questions and answers. Official EEOC website. Retrieved February 11, 2005, from http://www.eeoc.gov/facts/qanda.html
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.