This paper examines how the entertainment industry — specifically film and television — portrays fundamental human characteristics including age, gender, and personality. Drawing on psychological concepts such as Uniqueness vs. Universality and the Nature vs. Nurture debate, the paper analyzes how scripted and non-scripted media shape audience perceptions of human behavior. It explores how stereotypes emerge from media representations, how older female characters are underrepresented in film, and how depictions of mental illness, gender roles, and personality traits influence social norms and individual self-concept. The paper argues that film and television play a pivotal role in both reflecting and distorting the diversity of human experience.
The field of psychology offers a vast network of concepts, principles, and theories to explain and describe the mental and behavioral characteristics of an individual or group. It is a science that explores biological, cognitive, social, and various other aspects of the human mind and human interaction to explain behavioral traits and development, among other attributes. One such principle of psychology that attempts to explain a range of behavioral traits is personality psychology — a branch of psychology supported by studies of personality and individual differences. Personality psychology is an umbrella term covering a range of theories and concepts. One such concept offering insight into differences between individuals is the study of Uniqueness vs. Universality.
Uniqueness vs. Universality explores resulting personality as a product of the individual versus the product of a group dynamic. The argument investigates whether humans are distinctive as individuals (uniqueness) or whether all humans are generally similar in their nature (universality).
The concept of Uniqueness endorses the distinctiveness of the individual as a product of one's own attention to personal needs. Each person is an expert on their own life and can solely identify their emotional needs to promote health and well-being. During the lifespan, emotional needs experience ebb and flow, and it is only the individual who can assess and respond to those needs. Uniqueness holds that each person's needs are exclusive to them alone, and what fulfills one individual will not fulfill another.
The concept of Universality is rooted in the value that all humans share the same basic needs. For example, all humans need food, shelter, water, and sleep to survive. The requirement of these basic needs suggests that humans are fundamentally alike. The same logic applied to physical survival can then extend to shared emotional needs, translating into universal personality characteristics. Therefore, humans also share needs for feelings of belonging, love, respect, self-esteem, and self-actualization. Throughout the lifespan, all humans strive to obtain these emotional needs and, accordingly, shape their personalities in pursuit of them.
One of the oldest debates in psychology and the study of human behavior is the principle of Nature vs. Nurture. Although this discussion has been conducted for millennia — attributed to philosophers such as Plato and Descartes — it still carries modern relevance. The core of the debate can be distilled into a single question: Is an individual a product of their genetics (nature) or a product of the environment in which they live (nurture)?
The concept of nature as the sole driver of a person's personality, performance, and behavior is centered on genetic inheritance. For example, if someone is academically successful, this would be considered a result of their genetic make-up. With regard to the lifespan, one's successes, failures, and physical and mental attributes would all be a consequence of their DNA, occurring regardless of any environmental influences. This principle rests on a "born this way" approach, concluding that an individual is endowed with innate qualities that cannot be deterred.
The nurture aspect of the debate holds that personal experiences are responsible for how humans differ in physical and behavioral traits. This argument suggests it is not genetic influences, but human encounters and interactions, that determine how a person behaves and who they become — exerting direct influence throughout the lifespan. Philosophers such as John Locke believed humans are born as a blank slate, to be shaped and molded by experiences throughout life with no regard for inheritance.
In the present, the majority of psychologists believe nature and nurture work in unison rather than in opposition, as a combined product of biology and environment. Offspring inevitably inherit genetic traits from their parents that are reflected in their physical, mental, and emotional processes. Simultaneously, an individual is molded by family and peer interaction, cultural accessibility, and other contributing influences.
The entertainment industry hosts a complex network of media and creative outlets responsible for relaying news, live events, scripted stories, and other products of entertainment to the public. Through these channels, both non-fictional and fictional accounts are expressed and potentially received by a near-infinite audience. Two primary outlets reaching audiences from the entertainment industry are film and television — both of which have high accessibility due to online and digital markets. The vast film and television audiences are subject to a multitude of stories, images, and ideas that portray both intentional and unintentional implications concerning human behaviors and values.
The study of human behavior and ideals is a driving force behind storytelling, and film, television, and the entertainment industry are no exception. The entertainment industry depicts a range of human characteristics and circumstances; three of the most basic portrayals involve age, gender, and personality. Films and television shows feature characters representing males, females, various age groups, cultures, moral dilemmas, human flaws, and diverse traits. Some accounts chronicle family life, police procedurals, fantasy worlds, the supernatural, and high school settings — and those are but a small sample.
Despite the genre or target audience, every film and every television show provides insight into age, gender, and personality. These illustrations can be profound or unremarkable, intentional or coincidental. Regardless of intention, the reflections of these human traits are transmitted to the audience and project conceptions of the human race. Some conceptions glorify certain aspects while others are diminished; each program, scripted or non-scripted, sends a message.
"How media characters reflect age, gender roles, and personality"
"Stereotyping of gender, age, and mental illness in media"
Film and television, two arms of the entertainment industry capable of reaching large audiences, project numerous human traits and behaviors through the characters inhabiting the screen. Concepts of age, gender, and personality are portrayed by every program, by every character. All characters have an age, gender, race, relationship status, culture, weaknesses, and unique personalities. The features they project send messages to the audience that can be both intentional and accidental.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.