This paper examines the comparative advantages of aluminum horseshoes over traditional steel horseshoes for performance horses. Drawing on veterinary and animal science research, it traces the history of aluminum horseshoes from their early use in Quarter Horse shows in the 1970s through their established role in racing. The paper evaluates evidence related to animal welfare, including the treatment of navicular disease and hoof cracking, and reviews a kinematic study comparing carpal angles in horses shod with each material. The paper concludes that aluminum horseshoes are superior to steel in most performance contexts, offering reduced impact, greater speed, and improved orthopedic outcomes for horses suffering from degenerative conditions.
The paper uses a comparative analysis structure, systematically evaluating aluminum against steel across multiple criteria: weight, impact transmission, orthopedic outcomes, and speed. By applying this framework consistently, the author builds a cumulative argument rather than relying on a single piece of evidence, which is a hallmark of evidence-based academic writing in the applied sciences.
The paper opens with a broad framing of the debate around horseshoe materials, then narrows to animal welfare principles, historical context, disease-specific applications, and finally a direct kinematic experiment. Each section adds a new dimension — historical, clinical, or empirical — before the conclusion synthesizes all threads. This funnel structure, moving from general context to specific evidence, is well-suited to persuasive academic essays in veterinary and animal science fields.
There is a longstanding debate among animal welfare experts over the correct way to treat and handle animals. Some believe that the best approach is through entirely natural means — that is, without the use of shoes of any material. Such debates are inherently subjective and therefore very difficult to resolve objectively. Among the questions subject to discussion is whether the material used to create a horseshoe has any meaningful effect on the welfare of the horse wearing it.
It has been established that the first horseshoes were designed to improve the longevity of a horse's ability to work and to increase the individual animal's performance across various disciplines. Horseshoes have been made of strong metals since their inception; primarily they are made of iron, though other materials have also been used. Racehorses have been shod with aluminum horseshoes for some time, as this metal is extremely lightweight, malleable, and durable — properties that allow for speedier movement by the animals.
The question then becomes whether aluminum horseshoes would prove a viable replacement for traditional steel horseshoes in disciplines beyond horse racing. It is also important to consider that not all horses are physiologically similar, and this may have a significant impact on how certain materials affect a particular breed. Above all, researchers have concluded that under most circumstances, horseshoes made of aluminum are superior to those made from steel.
According to researchers, the most important consideration when determining the proper material to use on any animal is how the animal will respond to that substance. The key is to ensure that the animal is in no way harmed or distressed by the material chosen. For each individual task a horse is asked to perform, the design of the shoe should be balanced accordingly (Balch, 1997). If the wrong material is used for a particular purpose, the horse risks serious injury. Logically, if an improper material is applied, the animal may be worse off than if no artificial means had been used at all.
This is why the debate over the proper material for horseshoes has grown in importance. With advances in technology and the rise of organizations such as PETA, which vocalize the potential dangers animals face, there has been increased pressure on researchers and animal scientists to determine which materials best serve horses and other animals.
Researcher W. Koepsich (1996) traced the use of the aluminum horseshoe back through the decades and determined that it first gained widespread attention through its use in national horse shows. In such venues, owners wanted their animals to perform at their best, which included improving their gaits so that horses appeared elegant and light-footed. Under these circumstances, aluminum was found to be a more suitable material for horseshoes than steel.
The first breed widely associated with aluminum horseshoes, according to Koepsich's investigation, was the Quarter Horse in the 1970s — which is what led Koepsich to his further research. In his experimentation with Quarter Horses, Koepsich found that: "Compared to steel, aluminum is soft to a horse's foot and so does not transmit as much sting to a horse's feet and legs — a very important consideration for a show horse" (1996). It is logical that with a softer material, the act of stepping would be gentler and thus far less damaging to the animal over time.
With the evidence that has been acquired, it is possible to state without hesitation that for animals with potential injury or disease, aluminum horseshoes are superior to their steel counterparts. This is also true in conditions where the animal is required to reach high speeds, such as in horse racing. In these instances, aluminum horseshoes are lighter and more responsive, allowing the horse to reach higher speeds while also causing far less physical damage over time.
You’re 54% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.