Are America's Gun Laws Effective? A Policy Re-Assessment
This paper re-examines the effectiveness of American gun control laws in light of rising mass shootings and persistent political divisions. Beginning with the Gun Control Act of 1968, the paper traces the legislative and constitutional history of gun regulation, including key Supreme Court decisions such as District of Columbia v. Heller (2008) and McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010). It evaluates arguments on both sides of the debate, addressing Second Amendment rights, background checks, mental health screenings, high-capacity magazine bans, and the influence of lobbying organizations like the NRA. The paper also considers the media's role in shaping public discourse and the effect of gun politics on electoral outcomes, ultimately arguing that stricter gun control laws are necessary to protect public safety without eliminating constitutional rights.
- Introduction: A History of U.S. Gun Legislation: Origins of U.S. gun control laws since 1968
- The Second Amendment Debate: Constitutional arguments for and against gun rights
- Gun Violence, Public Safety, and the Case for Stricter Laws: Costs of gun violence and need for checks
- Political Considerations, Campaign Financing, and Media Influence: NRA funding, media role, and policy inaction
- Gun Policy, Voting Behavior, and Electoral Politics: How gun politics shapes elections and voters
- Conclusion: The Need for Stronger Gun Control: Call for stricter laws to protect public safety
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper grounds its argument in specific legislation and landmark Supreme Court rulings, lending legal credibility to its policy claims.
- It acknowledges and fairly summarizes opposing viewpoints — including constitutional, privacy, and tyranny concerns — before rebutting them, which strengthens the overall argument.
- Statistical and research-based evidence (Pew Research Center data, Webster and Wintemute's public health findings) is integrated alongside legal citations, giving the paper interdisciplinary depth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of concession and rebuttal: it presents the strongest opposing arguments (e.g., gun ownership as constitutional right, privacy concerns about background checks) and then systematically responds to them using legal precedent and empirical evidence. This technique prevents the essay from appearing one-sided while keeping the central thesis — that stricter gun laws are necessary — intact throughout.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a legislative history providing context, moves into constitutional interpretation via the Second Amendment, then shifts to public health and economic costs of gun violence. It broadens further into political science territory by examining NRA influence, media framing, and voting behavior before closing with a call-to-action conclusion. This progression from legal to social to political analysis shows how a single policy issue intersects multiple academic disciplines.
Introduction: A History of U.S. Gun Legislation
Signed into law on October 22, 1968, the Gun Control Act of 1968 is largely considered to be the first significant attempt at controlling not only interstate firearms commerce, but also firearm ownership. Prior to this legislation, other gun-control laws had been passed, including the National Firearms Act of 1934 and the Federal Firearms Act of 1938. These earlier laws did not, however, sufficiently put in place a mechanism for the effective regulation of firearm owners and the firearms industry. With the assassinations of both Martin Luther King Jr. and President John F. Kennedy, there was a clear need for interventionist measures in the realm of gun politics.
Today, gun control remains a divisive issue in American politics. Given an escalation in mass shooting incidents, it may be time to re-assess the effectiveness of existing gun-control laws. Stricter gun control laws should be enacted.
The Second Amendment Debate
It is important to note that both opponents and proponents of gun control argue that their position is firmly rooted in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Those in support of stricter laws contend that the framers of the Constitution had militias in mind when drafting the Second Amendment, while others are convinced that owning guns is an inalienable constitutional right. With regard to the latter perspective, Hayes (2016) points out that gun ownership is considered a longstanding tradition of American society and one that has the backing of the U.S. Constitution. It therefore follows that gun control laws that are inherently restrictive would go against not only the very fabric of society, but also against the supreme law of the land. As stated in the Second Amendment: "a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed" (Hayes, 2016, p. 33).
Several court rulings appear to reinforce this perspective, including McDonald v. City of Chicago (2010) (Johnson, Kopel, and Mocsary, 2017). On the other hand, proponents of stricter gun control laws often cite the U.S. Supreme Court majority opinion in District of Columbia et al. v. Heller (2008) to advance their position that unlimited rights to gun ownership have no basis in the Second Amendment. In that ruling, Justice Antonin Scalia stated:
"Like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited… nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms." (Cole, Smith, and DeJong, 2016, p. 105).
References
Ausman, J. I., & Faria, M. A. (2019). Is gun control really about people control? Surgical Neurology International, 10(6), 195–204.
Bouton, L., Conconi, P., Pino, F., & Zanardi, M. (2014). Guns and votes. Retrieved from https://www.nber.org/papers/w20253
Cole, G. F., Smith, C. E., & DeJong, C. (2016). Criminal justice in America (9th ed.). Cengage Learning.
Gramlich, J., & Schaeffer, K. (2019). 7 facts about guns in the U.S. Retrieved from
Hayes, V. (2016). Gun control in the United States. Journal of Political Sciences & Public Affairs, 4(2), 33–39.
Johnson, N. J., Kopel, D. B., & Mocsary, G. A. (2017). Firearms law and the Second Amendment: Regulation, rights, and policy. Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Joslyn, M., Haider-Markel, D., Baggs, M., & Bilbo, A. (2017). Emerging political identities? Gun ownership and voting in presidential elections. Social Science Quarterly, 98(2), 382–396.
Webster, D. W., & Wintemute, G. J. (2015). Effects of policies designed to keep firearms from high-risk individuals. Annual Review of Public Health, 36, 21–37.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.