Anglican and Reformation Theology: A Comparative Study
This paper compares Anglican and Reformed theology as they developed in the sixteenth century, examining how each tradition broke from Roman Catholicism while arriving at distinct doctrinal positions. Drawing on primary confessional documents—Luther's Ninety-five Theses, Cranmer's Thirty-nine Articles, and the Book of Common Prayer—and secondary scholarship, the paper analyzes four key areas of theological inquiry: the authority and interpretation of scripture, the doctrine of salvation and justification by faith, the nature and number of the sacraments, and Trinitarian theology. The comparison reveals substantial overlap between the two traditions, particularly in their shared commitment to scriptural authority and rejection of works-based salvation, while also highlighting Anglicanism's distinctive embrace of reason, tradition, and a more sacramental approach to Christian life.
- Introduction: Two Branches of Reformation Christianity: Origins and scope of the theological comparison
- Scripture: Authority, Vernacular, and Interpretation: Sola scriptura, vernacular access, and interpretive methods
- Salvation: Grace, Justification, and the Rejection of Works: Justification by faith and rejection of indulgences
- Sacraments: Signs, Presence, and Community: Eucharist, baptism, and sacramental theology compared
- Trinity: Shared Doctrinal Foundations: Shared Trinitarian doctrine across both traditions
- Conclusion: Overlap and divergence between the two traditions
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically organizes a complex theological comparison into four clearly defined doctrinal categories—scripture, salvation, sacraments, and the Trinity—making a broad subject manageable and readable.
- It grounds every theological claim in specific biblical texts, demonstrating how each tradition used scripture to authorize its positions, which adds scholarly depth and intellectual honesty.
- The paper balances breadth and precision: it covers multiple reformers (Luther, Calvin, Zwingli, Hooker, Cranmer) without losing the thread of the central comparison.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper exemplifies parallel comparative analysis: for each doctrinal topic, it presents the Reformed position first, then the Anglican response, using direct quotations from primary confessional documents (the Thirty-nine Articles, the Ninety-five Theses) alongside secondary scholarly sources. This structure allows the reader to track agreement and divergence simultaneously across multiple theological dimensions.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a historical introduction situating both traditions in the sixteenth century. The body is divided into four thematic sections—Scripture, Salvation, Sacraments, and Trinity—each following the same comparative pattern. The conclusion synthesizes the findings, emphasizing both the substantial overlap and the distinctive Anglican middle way. In-text citations follow APA format throughout, and a Works Cited list closes the paper.
Introduction: Two Branches of Reformation Christianity
Among the many varieties of Christian theology, the Reformation and Anglican traditions have exerted an immense influence through the centuries. Both arose around the same time in the sixteenth century as responses to dominant Roman Catholicism, and both deviated in significant ways from the mother church. Anglican theology grew partially out of, and was heavily influenced by, developments on the continent. Avis (2007) writes, "When the English reformers disclaimed any intention of promulgating new doctrines this did not mean that they did not have an argument over doctrine with the Church of Rome" (p. 42). After noting that Anglicans hardly revised the Christological and Trinitarian dogmas, he continues: "Issues concerning salvation, the sacraments, the ministry and authority were the storm centres of Reformation controversy" (Avis, 2007, p. 42). The same was true of the continental Reformation, which began with Luther's Ninety-five Theses (1517) posted to the Wittenberg church door. Out of these theses flowed a whole series of Reformed theological adjustments to tradition, causing a radical transformation in church life.
Anglicanism, on the other hand, proposed something closer to a middle way between Reformation and Catholic theologies. The beginnings of Anglicanism are often traced to the work of Thomas Cranmer, the Archbishop of Canterbury from 1532 to 1556. Influenced by continental Reformers, he gave the English Reformation its own unique character. According to R. T. Beckwith, it was Cranmer who obtained authorization for the English translation of the Bible, created the unique English liturgy of the Book of Common Prayer (1552), and authored the Thirty-nine Articles of Religion (completed in 1571) that constitute the Anglican confession of faith (1988, p. 21). Beginning with these texts, the Church of England developed its own brand of religious reflection and practice. The liturgical Book of Common Prayer was taken to be the fundamental expression of Anglican doctrine. Its authority for Anglicans rests on the principle of lex orandi lex credenda — "the law of prayer is the law of belief."
This essay compares these two branches of the Christian theological tradition, focusing on their early formulations in the sixteenth century. It highlights some of the biblical grounding for each position by drawing attention to the key ways in which scripture was understood in support of their respective stances. By formulating this comparison, it should become clear how purely Reformed theology and Anglican theology tackled the issues of scripture, salvation, sacraments, and the Trinity. This approach provides a general overview of the biblical sources of authority, forms of worship, and belief structures that were used to found the two positions.
Works Cited
Aland, K. (Ed.). (2004). Martin Luther's 95 theses. Saint Louis: Concordia Publishing House.
Avis, P. (2007). The identity of Anglicanism: essentials of Anglican ecclesiology. London and New York: T & T Clark.
Bayer, Oswald. (2008). Martin Luther's theology: a contemporary interpretation (Trans. T. H. Trapp). Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
Beckwith, R. T. (1988). "Anglicanism." In New dictionary of theology (S. B. Ferguson & D. F. Wright, Eds.), pp. 21–23. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.
Brooks, P. N. (2002). "Thomas Cranmer (1489–1556)." In The Reformation theologians: an introduction to theology in the early modern period (C. Lindberg, Ed.), pp. 239–252. Oxford: Blackwell.
Brauer, J. C. (Ed.). (1971). "England, Church of." In The Westminster dictionary of church history, pp. 297–99. Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Eppley, D. F. (2002). "Richard Hooker (1554–1600)." In The Reformation theologians: an introduction to theology in the early modern period (C. Lindberg, Ed.), pp. 253–266. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hughes, P. E. (1965). Theology of the English Reformers. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
McGrath, Alister. (1999). Reformation thought: an introduction (3rd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
Reardon, B. M. G. (1981). Religious thought in the Reformation. London: Longman.
Thomas, W. H. G. (1979). The principles of theology: an introduction to the Thirty-nine Articles. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Book House.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.