Catherine Keller's Theology of Creation in On the Mystery
This paper analyzes Chapter 3 of Catherine Keller's On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Progress, focusing on her postmodern, feminist, and ecological reinterpretation of the Genesis creation narrative. The paper examines Keller's central metaphor of the fish moving with the flow of water, her reclamation of Genesis for progressive theology, her exploration of darkness as creative rather than evil, and her connections between scripture and modern astrophysics. The paper also evaluates limitations in Keller's approach, including its ahistorical character and reliance on English translation, while affirming her broader argument that faith and science need not be mutually exclusive.
- Introduction: Creation as Living and Dynamic: Keller's fish metaphor and ecological vision of creation
- Reclaiming Genesis for Progressive Theology: Genesis reread beyond fundamentalism and scientism
- Postmodern Possibilities and Pantheist Readings: Multiple interpretations and pantheist potential in scripture
- Scripture and Modern Astrophysics: Connections between dark energy and biblical darkness
- Reclaiming Darkness as Creative Potential: Darkness as creative force, not absence of God
- Limitations and Strengths of Keller's Approach: Ahistorical method balanced against theological value
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper uses a single, consistent central metaphor — the fish moving with the current — to thread together multiple theological arguments, giving the analysis cohesion.
- It balances exposition of Keller's ideas with brief critical evaluation, noting the ahistorical character of her method without dismissing her contribution.
- Direct quotations from Keller are well-chosen and purposefully integrated, supporting rather than replacing the student's own analytical voice.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates close reading of a primary theological text, identifying recurring themes (multiplicity, ecological interconnection, reclamation of marginalized symbols) and linking them to Keller's broader postmodern framework. The student shows the ability to distinguish between descriptive summary and interpretive analysis, offering judgment on both the strengths and the methodological constraints of Keller's approach.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by establishing Keller's governing metaphor and ecological worldview, then moves through her treatment of Genesis, postmodern interpretation, connections with astrophysics, and the reclamation of darkness. It closes with a balanced critical assessment of the method's limitations alongside its theological value. The argument flows logically from introduction of core ideas to evaluation.
Introduction: Creation as Living and Dynamic
Catherine Keller's On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Progress envisions creation as a living, dynamic reality rather than something static and unchanging. The central metaphor governing Chapter 3 of her book is that of the fish: a fish constantly moves with the ebbs and flows of the water around it and, instead of drowning or being swallowed up by the currents of change, it is able to press forward. The fish also supports Keller's ecological view of the universe. Keller stresses the need for human beings to see themselves as part of the universe rather than as dominators of it.
Keller finds particular inspiration in the ambiguous, bi-gendered vision of the divine presented in the first creation myth of Genesis, as opposed to the second myth, which portrays a more anthropocentric God and a more rigid gender hierarchy.1
Reclaiming Genesis for Progressive Theology
Keller's work also attempts to reclaim the myth of Genesis for progressive theologians. In the present day, it has too long been viewed in a literalist fashion, as a manifestation of pseudo-scientific intelligent design.2 Rather than seeing it as evidence of creation emerging from nothing, Keller instead reads it as the formation of the world from the watery depths. This primordial chaos she regards as more commensurate with evolution than might be assumed; more importantly, it functions as a powerful metaphor.
"Flow in nature is a natural function not of a smooth, continuous motion but of pulsation, as the in-and-out-take of breath keeping your oxygen steady … as in the ebb and flow of the waves keeping the water moving."3 Keller urges the reader to break out of the current dichotomy that frames the Genesis debate as a contest solely between fundamentalists and scientists, and to make more creative space in the narrative for contemporary theological wisdom in the feminist and ecological tradition.
Postmodern Possibilities and Pantheist Readings
Specifically, Keller is fascinated by the narrative's postmodern possibilities outside the realm of either form of reductionism. She holds postmodernism to be uniquely life-affirming because of its capacity to engage with multiple rather than singular modes of interpretation. Keller even sees the possibilities of pantheist readings within the narrative — the idea that everything is God, and that God is the universe itself.
Keller's point of view reflects the idea that the reader is always in an internal dialogue with scripture, rather than being dictated to by an outside authority in the form of a formal church or creed. The full range of the interpreter's religious experiences, including encounters with other faiths, are considered relevant to this ongoing conversation.
Bibliography
Keller, Catherine. On the Mystery: Discerning Divinity in Progress. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2008.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.