This paper examines the history and application of antitrust exemptions in the United States, beginning with the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890 and the Clayton Act of 1914. It traces how labor unions obtained both statutory and non-statutory exemptions from antitrust prosecution, and how professional sports leagues leveraged those exemptions to maintain control over players and suppress rival organizations. The paper discusses landmark cases including Mackey v. NFL, Flood v. Kuhn, and Brown v. Pro Football, and concludes with an analysis of how the Curt Flood Act of 1998 significantly limited baseball's antitrust exemption and expanded players' rights to seek legal relief.
One of the first national laws against trusts and monopolies was the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890, which applies to all businesses engaged in interstate or international commerce. Federal law and the courts have defined commerce very broadly, as the "giving of essentially anything in return for barter or money" unless a specific exemption is granted (ABA, 2007, p. 7). Up to the 1970s and 1980s, many industries held such exemptions, including shipping, trucking, airlines, and telephones, on the grounds that excessive competition was destructive and destabilizing to the economy, or that foreign cartels had an unfair advantage over American industries.
According to the Clayton Act and Federal Trade Commission Act of 1914, and the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, labor unions are specifically exempt from prosecution on antitrust grounds. Moreover, the Supreme Court granted them non-statutory exemptions in the Jewel Tea and Pennington cases of 1965. Unions cannot be prosecuted on antitrust grounds when negotiating with employers about wages, hours, benefits, and working conditions, although they are not permitted to "pursue the anti-competition interests of the employer group" (Wise and Meyer, 1997, p. 65). On the whole, non-statutory labor exemptions have led to "complex legal issues that courts have wrestled with for decades with little success," especially in professional sports (Wise and Meyer, 1997, p. 63).
"Sports leagues exploit exemptions to control players"
"Baseball exemption challenged and partially overturned"
You’re 34% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.