This paper evaluates the Apple iPad through the lens of its defining characteristics, or "ilities": capability, compatibility, reliability, affordability, and usability. Presented in order from most to least important, the analysis examines how the iPad's broad app ecosystem and hardware features establish its core value, how its limited compatibility with non-Apple formats creates trade-offs, and how Apple's tightly controlled iOS environment supports reliability. Affordability is assessed relative to the device's multi-purpose functionality, while usability—though strong—is considered the least critical factor. Together, these ilities offer a structured framework for consumers evaluating whether the iPad suits their needs.
This paper demonstrates structured product analysis using a multi-criteria evaluation framework. By isolating each "ility" as a discrete section with its own evidence, the writer avoids conflating distinct product attributes — a common pitfall in consumer product writing. This technique mirrors formal product assessment methodologies used in engineering and business contexts.
The paper opens with a brief introduction defining the evaluative framework, then proceeds through five body sections — capability, compatibility, reliability, affordability, and usability — each organized as a standalone analysis. A short conclusion synthesizes all five criteria into a final purchasing recommendation. Citations from tech publications (CNET, The New York Times, T3) lend credibility to specific feature claims.
In recent years, the Apple iPad has been one of the most talked-about gadgets in consumer electronics. Creating a huge buzz before it was even released, it was a highly coveted product that sold out at many stores within moments of going on sale. Since its release, it has polarized public opinion on whether it is a fantastic, cutting-edge product or an overpriced status symbol. The "ilities," or defining characteristics, of the iPad help evaluate it as a product. Some ilities are more important measures than others.
The most important ility of the iPad is its capability to perform various tasks. If the right capabilities are not present, consumers will not purchase the product. The Apple iPad is designed to consolidate all of a user's current electronic gadgets — such as an e-reader, laptop, and gaming device — into one compact package (Sawh, 2010). It includes a host of technological features, including a built-in wireless antenna enabling internet browsing from virtually anywhere. Users can play their iTunes collection through the built-in speakers and use the iPad's microphone to call and speak to someone on Skype.
The iPad's capabilities are further enhanced by its applications. Apps, as they are commonly known, are programs users can download and run on the iPad. Some apps are useful tools, such as MathBoard, an educational program designed to develop mathematical skills. Others are purely for entertainment, such as Scrabble. A large number of apps are free and available directly from the Apple website, while others can be purchased starting as low as $1.99.
By using the apps format, users can create their own unique version of the iPad — configuring it as a state-of-the-art gaming device or an indispensable business tool. The iPad's capabilities make it an attractive product for those who are tired of carrying numerous electronic devices and those who enjoy the customization that apps offer.
One of the most common complaints about Apple products is that they are only compatible with other Apple products and Apple-approved software. As such, the compatibility features — or lack thereof — of the Apple iPad are an important consideration, particularly for users who rely on non-Apple products and platforms.
One key issue is that the iPad does not support Adobe Flash. This means that many Flash-driven websites load with blank white spaces instead of content. As a rule, Apple products have never supported Flash, and the company shows no signs of changing this policy. For users, this means waiting for many sites to convert their content to a compatible format (Pogue, 2010). Additionally, there are no USB ports or input jack sockets for accessories such as cameras, which means that while users can make audio calls on Skype, video chat is not possible. For many, this limitation undermines the appeal of an application like Skype, where seeing the other person is a significant part of the experience.
On a more positive note, the iPad — much like the iPhone and iPod — is compatible with Windows operating systems. It can be synced with any computer running Windows XP, Vista, or Windows 7, allowing users without other Apple products to access the same apps and features as those who own an Apple personal computer.
However, all apps must be approved by Apple before release and can only be purchased through the Apple iTunes Store (Bell, 2010). Some users find this approach less appealing than the open policies of many Windows-based platforms. Although Apple's control over apps and programs is seen by many as restrictive, there are benefits to this approach — particularly in terms of reliability, discussed in the next section.
Apple products have always faced criticism for their limited compatibility, and the iPad is no exception. Some concerns have been addressed, such as the ability to sync with Windows computers. However, ongoing issues — including the absence of USB ports, no Flash support, and tightly controlled app access — remain notable drawbacks.
When it comes to purchasing an Apple iPad, there are several factors to consider. The ilities described above — from most to least important — provide a framework consumers can use to evaluate the iPad against their own needs and expectations. If capability, compatibility, reliability, affordability, and usability all meet a satisfactory standard, then the iPad represents a wise purchase. If not, these same ilities can be applied to evaluate other products and determine which is the right fit.
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.