This paper examines Martin Lindstrom's Brand Sense theory, which argues that effective branding must engage all five senses rather than relying solely on visual elements. The paper applies this framework to Apple, analyzing how the company strategically employs touch, sound, and visual design to build a cohesive brand identity. It discusses the role of tactile product design, music selection in advertising, and consistent visual aesthetics in reinforcing Apple's image as an innovator. The paper also notes the limits of multisensory branding, explaining why Apple appropriately excludes smell and taste from its strategy while maintaining long-term consistency across its sensory brand signals.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper uses a theoretical lens (Lindstrom's Brand Sense framework) as an analytical scaffold, methodically testing each sensory dimension against Apple's actual branding practices. This theory-to-application structure is a core technique in business and marketing essays, showing how abstract models can generate specific, verifiable claims about real companies.
The paper opens by introducing Lindstrom's theory and its core claim, then transitions to Apple as the case study. It proceeds sense-by-sense—visual, touch, sound—before addressing why two senses are excluded. It closes by connecting Apple's long-term brand consistency back to Lindstrom's concept of branding as a "lifelong dialogue." This funnel structure (theory → application → evaluation → conclusion) is characteristic of a well-organized undergraduate marketing essay.
Martin Lindstrom's Brand Sense theory holds that branding should incorporate all of our senses, not just the visual. He argues that because most branding is focused on visual elements such as logos, designs, and the rendering of names, the brand is not fully optimized. Only by incorporating touch, smell, taste, and sound does a brand become fully established with the consumer.
The underlying premise is that consumers interact with the world using all five senses, and each sense has an impact on our emotions. Branding is, in large part, about creating emotions—or at the very least, positive associations—with the brand. Since these feelings can be stimulated through any of the different senses, branding can be effective using any sense. Consider the use of sound in Intel's television advertisements, or the artificial smells piped to the exterior of certain fast food outlets to trigger a response in passersby. Apple offers a prominent example of a company that strategically leverages the sense of touch.
Apple has long valued the brand above all other elements of its offering. The objective is not to downplay the product, but rather to create customers who identify as Apple customers first and customers of a specific product second. Anything Apple produces should, ideally, be viewed with the same positive regard by the consumer. The same attributes and sentiments that a consumer feels for one Apple product should extend to all Apple products.
To that end, Apple focuses on its name and visual brand elements, as well as touch. The company aims for its products to have strong visual appeal—sleek and ultramodern—because this fits its desired brand image as an innovator. Lindstrom acknowledges that most branding is based on the visual, though he does not argue against it. He simply notes that visual branding, as useful as it is, should not be the sum total of the branding effort. Apple treats visual branding as a critical component, entirely consistent with Lindstrom's framework.
Touch works in concert with Apple's visual strategy. The sleek, ultramodern image the company projects visually should be matched by a corresponding tactile experience. The extensive use of touchscreens and distinctive controls on Apple's handheld products conveys a specific image of the company and its products. Because these tactile traits are shared across multiple product lines, they become associated with Apple as a company rather than with any individual product. This allows the sentiments created by touch to carry over to other Apple products, even when the precise tactile sensations differ.
You’re 47% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.