This paper examines Thomas Aquinas's philosophical project of reconciling faith and reason, drawing primarily on the Summa Contra Gentiles and the Summa of Theology. The paper walks through Aquinas's "Five Ways" of knowing God — arguments from motion, causality, possibility and necessity, degrees of perfection, and intelligent design — demonstrating how each combines logical reasoning with an implicit reliance on faith. The paper then explores Aquinas's broader claim that faith and reason occupy distinct but complementary domains: reason provides stepping-stones toward God, while faith alone can bridge the insurmountable gap between the human mind and the divine. The paper concludes that Aquinas transformed Christian epistemology by showing that belief in God is not irrational but rather supported by internally valid logical proofs.
Thomas Aquinas was fundamentally concerned with the compatibility of faith and reason. In the Summa Contra Gentiles and the Summa Theologiae in particular, Aquinas presents his arguments for the synthesis of faith and reason. Aquinas offers a rather ironic glimpse at the nature of reason, which is both capable of intellectual comprehension of God and yet simultaneously insufficient for fully understanding God. He argues that God can be ascertained and even logically proven through the use of reason, but that the experience of God is a transcendent, spiritual, and emotional one that requires faith. Faith also fulfills the goals of reason, which are a truer and greater understanding of God. Whereas faith fails to provide the means by which to perceive the mundane world, reason is unable to offer a genuine proof or understanding of God on its own.
One of the ways Aquinas reconciles faith and reason is by proving the salience of faith itself. This rhetorical move is most clearly articulated in Aquinas's "Five Ways" argument. According to Aquinas, there are five ways of knowing God — five ways of defending faith in God. God may be ascertained, known, experienced, and understood through each of these ways. Each is essentially rational in nature and entails a logical proof, yet each can also be shown to be compatible with faith. Faith may reinforce each of the five ways, just as the reason used to analyze God in one or more of these ways substantiates and enhances faith in God. What Aquinas accomplishes with the Five Ways argument is to establish faith as a catalyst for a reasoned understanding of God.
The first way is through the perception of motion and its measurability. Because the human sense organs are capable of sensing motion, and because motion is generally accepted as fact, motion must be explained as having a singular cause. God is the primal, or original, mover, according to Aquinas. Although this first way rests on the assumption that there must be a prime mover, the argument retains an internal logic. Aquinas claims that things cannot move by themselves, especially cosmic elements such as planets. He goes further to claim that an object cannot move itself because doing so would contradict the laws of nature. In particular, Aquinas supposes that an object cannot simultaneously be both the subject and the object of the same action — in this case, movement. It may take a leap of faith to feel God, but it does not take a leap of faith to use reason.
The second way of knowing God is through an understanding of causality. The law of cause and effect is related to the first way — movement — in that Aquinas again refers to the impossibility of being both cause and effect, just as an object cannot simultaneously be mover and moved. All effects must have causes, and all causes must have effects. Given this, the universe must have an ultimate cause. That cause is, for Aquinas, God. The faith required to make the logical leap to God as the primal cause is an ironic demonstration of the compatibility of faith and reason. Faith and reason occupy distinct rhetorical domains, and yet Aquinas manages to fuse them in several of the Five Ways of knowing God.
"Contingency, perfection, and design arguments for God"
"Faith surpasses reason yet coexists with it"
"Grace and faith bridge reason's gap with God"
According to Thomas Aquinas, faith is fully compatible with reason. Whereas faith is a superior method of ascertaining God, reason is often necessary for overcoming the mental or cognitive hindrances to accepting the reality of God. Aquinas's argument concerning the ways of knowing God provides a core framework for presenting God to those whose faith is weak. Ultimately, Aquinas distinguishes between the type of faith evident in absolute or mystical conviction and the type of faith that is more intellectual in tone. Both have their place within his philosophical system, and together they form the basis of a Christian epistemology that has endured for centuries.
You’re 40% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.