Aquinas's Five Ways: Reason, Faith, and Their Limits
This paper examines Thomas Aquinas's Five Ways — his five classical arguments for the existence of God — and argues that each proof, despite its rational structure, ultimately rests on an assumed foundation of faith. Working through each Way in sequence, the paper explains Aquinas's core logic, identifies the point at which faith substitutes for demonstration, and offers philosophical and scientific objections to each argument. Topics include the arguments from motion, efficient causation, contingency, degrees of perfection, and the governance of natural things. The paper concludes that faith, by its very nature, resists proof, and that Aquinas's reasoning reflects the unquestioned theological assumptions of his era.
- Introduction: Thesis: each Way assumes faith as foundation
- The First Way: Motion and Change: Argument from change ends with assumed God
- The Second Way: Efficient Cause: Causal order attributed to divine first cause
- The Third Way: Contingency and Necessity: Contingent beings require a necessary God
- The Fourth Way: Degrees of Perfection: Supreme goodness assumes God as pure virtue
- The Fifth Way: Governance of Natural Things: Natural patterns attributed to divine guidance
- Conclusion: Faith ultimately underlies all five proofs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper consistently applies a two-part structure within each section: it first explains Aquinas's argument in accessible terms, then immediately raises a specific objection, keeping the analysis focused and readable.
- The author uses a clear unifying thesis — that faith is the hidden skeleton of each proof — and returns to it throughout, giving the paper coherent argumentative momentum.
- Quotations from primary and secondary sources are deployed precisely to mark the moment each Way concludes with a faith-based assertion, making the textual evidence visible to the reader.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates close philosophical reading paired with immanent critique — rather than rejecting Aquinas from an external standpoint, it enters each argument on its own terms and identifies the internal moment where logical demonstration gives way to assumption. This technique is especially well suited to analyzing historical theological texts.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing thesis, then devotes one section to each of the Five Ways in canonical order, maintaining parallel internal structure throughout. A brief conclusion synthesizes the cumulative finding. The Works Cited section follows standard academic citation conventions. Total length is moderate, appropriate for an undergraduate philosophy essay that surveys a multi-part argument without exhaustive depth on any single proof.
Introduction
The Five Ways — Thomas Aquinas's celebrated arguments for the existence of God — are widely regarded as some of the most practical and substantive philosophical proofs ever composed on the subject. Though they possess considerable merit, the reality of each argument both begins and ends with simple faith. The reader or philosopher is ultimately left to interpret Aquinas's logic through statements that all conclude with an assumption of faith, making faith the very structure and skeleton of his proofs.
Though his works are well thought out, they were created in an era when questioning ultimate truths was virtually unheard of. The faith of Aquinas, and of the whole period in which he wrote, is assumed throughout the dialogue of his proofs, in many ways reducing each individual proof to yet another representation of faith. This paper will briefly explain and define each proof and then attempt to demonstrate the point at which faith enters each of the Five Ways and the arguments associated with it.
In the entire set of proofs, Aquinas demonstrates the use of reason and scientific thought. He spends considerable effort formulating, both for himself and for the reader, explanations of each preceding assertion. With or without these explanations, it is clear that he is speaking to an audience that both assumes and believes that God exists. Even today, "many human beings have reasons for such a belief that are informal versions of one of the five ways; they suppose, for example, that because there is order in the universe there must be a principle of order" (Hibbs 573).
The First Way: Motion and Change
In the First Way, Aquinas relates the existence of God to the process of change. He states that within this world all people admit that things exist which are in the process of change, and that this change is initiated by a force other than the thing itself. Aquinas then argues that if this is the case — and he asserts that it obviously is — there must have been an initial force that changed something into something else, because a thing cannot simultaneously be what it is and what it has the potential to be.
Closing the argument, Aquinas attributes the property of this initial force of change to God, since the process cannot be infinite in either direction and must therefore have a finite first cause. "So we have to come to some first initiator of change which is not in a process of change initiated by something else, and everyone understands that this is God" (Martin 134).
Clearly, Aquinas frames his argument within a particular historical context, charging "everyone" with a belief in God and thus invoking a blindly assumed tenet of reality — an unchangeable fact of life. Refutation of this argument is fairly straightforward and accepted by millions: the very nature of faith is that it is blind. Faith cannot be affirmed by proof, because once it is proven it is no longer faith.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.