Auditory processing disorder (APD) is a condition affecting how the brain processes sound information despite normal peripheral hearing. This paper examines the nature of APD, distinguishing between developmental and acquired forms, and explores genetic and neurological factors underlying the disorder. It discusses diagnostic challenges, particularly debates over modality-specific testing approaches, and examines the effects of APD on academic performance, language development, and literacy. The paper reviews evidence-based treatment methods, including auditory training software and speech therapy, while addressing the limitations of current research and the compensatory strategies individuals with APD develop.
Auditory processing disorder, abbreviated as APD, is also called central auditory processing disorder. APD is a group term covering various disorders affecting the manner in which auditory information is processed in the brain. Individuals suffering from APD have normal function and structure of the middle, inner, and outer ear through peripheral hearing. However, such persons are not able to process information heard in the same ways as people with normal processing capabilities, leading to difficulties in recognition and interpretation of sounds. The sounds include composition of speech and well-considered approaches to addressing difficulties arising from central nervous system dysfunction, especially in the brain (Musiek & Chermak, 2007). APD is not featured within mainstream diagnostic classifications of mental disorders. Scientists note that APD can be diagnosed through difficulties across various auditory processes that reflect central auditory nervous system function.
APD affects both adults and children, even though the actual prevalence remains unknown. Studies show that males have twice as high probability of contracting the disorder as females. Auditory processing disorder can be either an acquired or developmental condition. The disorder may result from ear infections, neuro-developmental delays, or head injuries affecting auditory information processing (Holland, 2011). The condition includes problems with sound lateralization and localization; temporal aspects of audition; auditory discrimination; and auditory pattern recognition such as temporal integration and discrimination through gap detection. Other aspects include temporal ordering and masking, auditory performance for competing acoustic signals such as dichotic listening, and auditory performance for degraded acoustic signals.
Acquired APD occurs because of possible dysfunction or damage to the central auditory nervous system, which causes more auditory processing problems. Auditory processing disorder can arise from genetic and hereditary characteristics. An individual's ability to comprehend and listen to multiple messages at a given time is a characteristic trait heavily influenced by personal genes (Musiek & Chermak, 2007). Short circuits in neural systems run through familial generations, result from difficult births, and compare to other learning disabilities. Auditory processing disorder is linked to conditions influenced by genetic traits, including various developmental disorders. Auditory processing disorder inheritance refers to elements of whether such conditions are inherited from parents or are established in the family tree. APD could include inherent neurological traits from either the father or mother (Holland, 2011).
APD is one of the most difficult disorders to diagnose and detect. Subjective symptoms leading to APD evaluation include intermittent inabilities to process verbal information that lead individuals to guess in order to address the processing gaps. On the other hand, there are disproportionate problems associated with decoding speech across noisy environments. APD is defined in anatomic terms based on the integrity of auditory areas across the main nervous system. Children with APD symptoms do not have evidence pointing to neurological disease, and diagnosis relies on performance and behavioral auditory tests. Further, auditory processing is translated as what people do with what they hear. APD presents a mismatch between the ability to discriminate or interpret sounds and normal peripheral hearing ability. Therefore, these components do not engage neurological impairment signs, and APD can be diagnosed based on auditory tests. Modality-specificity issues lead to considerable arguments across different experts in the field.
The concept of representation argues that APD is best defined as perceptual dysfunction that is modality-specific and not based on peripheral hearing loss (Roeser & Downs, 2011). Critics add that inclusive APD conceptualizations include a lack of diagnostic specificity. Modality-specificity requirements could potentially alter the inclusion of children with poor auditory performance due to other factors such as poor memory or attention. However, others argue that modality-specific approaches are too narrow and miss children with genuine perceptual problems affecting both auditory and visual processing. It is impractical for audiologists to lack access to proper and standardized tests that include visual analogs for different auditory tests (Parthasarathy, 2014). The discussion on this issue remains quite unresolved. The modality-specific approaches diagnose fewer APD children than modality-general techniques. The latter approach operates at a risk of including children failing auditory tests due to reasons away from poor auditory processing. Even though modality-specific testing is advocated, no tests to date are published to allow audiologists to perform evaluations on a modality-specific basis. No clinical provisions of visual analogs for auditory processing tests exist (Holland, 2011).
The direct causes remain unknown for most developmental APD cases. The major exceptions include Landau-Kleffner syndrome or acquired epileptic aphasia. These conditions illustrate developmental regression in a child where language comprehension faces severe impairment. The children are normally perceived to be deaf even though normal peripheral hearing is present. In subsequent cases, known or suspected APD causes among children include delay of myelin maturation, genetic predisposition, and auditory cortical ectopic cells in various areas. Families with autosomal dominant epilepsy show aspects of seizures affecting the left temporal lobe that appear to induce problems in auditory processing (Musiek & Chermak, 2007). From other members of the extended family with high APD rates, genetic analysis shows haplotypes of chromosome 12 that fully co-segregate with language impairment.
Hearing begins in utero while central auditory systems continue developing in the following years. Considerable research shows that disruption to hearing is based on sensitive periods that have prolonged auditory development consequences. Studies show that thalamocortically connectivity in vitro is linked to a developmental window that is time-sensitive and requires lcam5, a particular cell adhesion molecule, for proper brain plasticity to occur (Roeser & Downs, 2011). The concept points to the need for connectivity in the cortex and thalamus after affecting the ability to hear during at least one auditory processing period. Other studies show that rats living in a one-tone environment across certain critical development periods have auditory processing abilities that are permanently impaired. Compromised sensory experiences, including temporary deafness from cochlear removal among rats, led to observations of neuron shrinkage (Long & Eifert, 2012). Studies focusing on APD patients show that children having a blocked ear developed high right-ear abilities, although not in a position to modulate such advantage across directed-attention tasks.
Individuals with auditory processing disorder have difficulties in paying attention to and remembering information presented orally and continue struggling with information acquired visually. Patients also have difficulties undertaking multi-step directions presented orally and hence need to hear sounds from a single direction at a given time (Madell & Flexer, 2011). Such people also have poor listening competencies and skills, requiring more time to process necessary information. APD patients face low academic performance and have behavior problems. Studies show that individuals have difficulties with language as they confuse syllable sequences due to problems understanding language and developing vocabulary. Lastly, APD patients have difficulties with reading, spelling, comprehension, and vocabulary (Parthasarathy, 2014).
Specific developmental dyslexia and language impairment are related in various ways. Specific language impairment is observed when children have difficulties producing or comprehending spoken language without an apparent cause (Geffner & Ross-Swain, 2013). These issues are not explained by peripheral hearing loss. Children with typical speech issues and problems producing speech sounds clearly also have difficulties understanding and producing complex sentences. Various theoretical accounts of specific developmental dyslexia regard it as an outcome of auditory processing problems. However, this view is not universally supported, as critics consider the major specific language impairment difficulties as problems stemming from higher-level language processing aspects. In areas where children have both language and auditory problems, it is hard to differentiate the aspects of cause-and-effect. Standard practice is to evaluate APD based on tests involving the identification, repetition, and discrimination of speech (Madell & Flexer, 2011). Further, children perform poorly due to primary language problems. Studies that compare children with a dyslexia diagnosis are involved in APD diagnosis. The observations raise worrying possibilities that diagnosis of a child may largely be a specialist function, leading to misdiagnosis if other caregivers are not adequately consulted.
"Auditory training, software interventions, speech therapy, and coping strategies"
You’re 73% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.