Balanced Scorecard in Business and BAA Terminal 5
This paper examines the Balanced Scorecard (BSC) as a strategic management tool used by business organizations to align vision, strategy, and performance metrics. Drawing on survey data from IMA members and KPMG management consultants, the paper demonstrates the BSC's effectiveness in improving operating performance and financial results. The paper then applies these principles to a case analysis of the British Airport Authority's (BAA) Terminal 5 project, exploring how the BSC was adapted to accommodate the unique dynamics of a large-scale, capital-intensive infrastructure project involving both public and private sector stakeholders with differing organizational goals.
- Introduction to the Balanced Scorecard: BSC overview in global business context
- Balanced Scorecard Use in Business Organizations: Survey evidence of BSC performance and incentives
- Case Analysis: BAA Terminal 5 Project: BSC applied to BAA Terminal 5 construction
- Adapting the Scorecard to Public-Private Dynamics: Scorecard quadrant differences across sector types
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses concrete survey data (IMA and KPMG findings) to substantiate claims about the BSC's effectiveness, grounding theoretical discussion in empirical evidence.
- Moves logically from general framework description to a specific real-world case, allowing abstract concepts to be tested against practical application.
- Acknowledges limitations and potential biases in the data (e.g., upward response bias in BSC surveys), demonstrating critical analytical thinking rather than uncritical acceptance of sources.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the technique of framework application — introducing a management tool in general terms, surveying empirical support for it, and then applying it to a specific organizational case. This structure is common in business and management writing and shows how theoretical models must be adapted when real-world conditions (such as mixed public-private governance) complicate their implementation.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a contextual introduction situating the BSC within global business competition. A general-use section follows, presenting survey-based evidence of BSC effectiveness and discussing incentive-linking practices. The case analysis section then shifts to the BAA Terminal 5 project, examining how public-private sector tensions affect BSC implementation. The paper closes by comparing and contrasting how the standard scorecard quadrants — including Financial Focus and Internal processes — must be recalibrated for differing organizational goals.
Introduction to the Balanced Scorecard
The global environment continues to be very contentious as organizations compete for market share around the world. As business continues to become more integrated, it is necessary to have standardized rules and processes. This standardization, however, must be adapted to fit the local constituency within a given market. The balanced scorecard is no different in this regard. A balanced scorecard allows businesses to better ascertain their particular strengths within a given capital project. As businesses are now more global in nature, they have a larger array of opportunities to employ their financial capital. A balanced scorecard helps to ensure that capital is utilized properly while also ensuring a proper response to changing macroeconomic environments.
The balanced scorecard, as evidenced by the British Airport Authority case study, can be altered depending on the assignment. It is unique in that it is broad enough to encompass varying financial and qualitative metrics, while also being specific enough to hold stakeholders accountable. This essay is designed to outline the use of the balanced scorecard within a general context. Subsequent sections provide practical application of the balanced scorecard as it relates to the British Airport Authority, discussing the use of private contractors within a public infrastructure project and outlining how both the private and public sectors collaborated — using the balanced scorecard — to implement a successful project. The document also explains the unique applications of the balanced scorecard as it relates to the British Airport Authority, comparing and contrasting how the scorecard was adapted to the specific requirements of that organization.
Balanced Scorecard Use in Business Organizations
There is significant evidence suggesting that the Balanced Scorecard approach is amenable to most organizations. The balanced scorecard tries to improve internal and external communications and monitors organizational performance against strategic goals. It is a management system that allows companies to clarify their vision and strategy and translate them into action, providing feedback on both internal and external business processes.
A survey of IMA members in management positions indicates that 88% of regular users of the balanced scorecard believe it has led to improved operating performance. Conversely, a KPMG management consultant survey stated that over 70% of companies implementing the balanced scorecard saw an increase in working productivity (Robert, 2001). The survey, however, also implied that it is a very difficult proposition to link performance targets to compensation. Of the 88% of organizations regularly using the BSC that reported improvements in operating performance, 66% also reported an increase in profits. Correspondingly, those who have not experienced an increase in operating performance generally have not noticed an increase in profits due to implementing the BSC — evidence of the cause-and-effect linkage between the BSC perspectives. According to the KPMG survey, 61% of companies reported improvements in bottom-line financial results.
The numbers indicate that using the balanced scorecard can be beneficial. The surveys have also indicated, however, that there may be an upward bias, as those who have not experienced success with the BSC may have chosen not to participate in the survey (Robert, 2006).
According to the KPMG survey, 60% of regular users of the BSC provided financial incentives to employees for meeting or exceeding targets congruent with BSC measures. At the top level, CEOs are given stock options to provide an incentive to increase share prices. Business unit managers, middle managers, and front-line supervisors can have their bonuses and salary increases linked to meeting or exceeding targets. This has proven to help companies deliver on financial metrics overall. However, it has also given rise to significant fraud and accounting manipulation, as managers facing these financial pressures attempt to make their targets.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.