Bases of Power and Dependency in Organizations
This paper examines the five bases of power and their relationship to dependency within an organizational setting through a case study analysis. Drawing on established frameworks, the paper illustrates how coercive, legitimate, reward, referent, and expert power manifest differently across employees at varying levels of an organization. The analysis shows how formal authority, specialized knowledge, and personal characteristics each contribute to distinct power dynamics. The paper also explores how dependency—shaped by the importance, scarcity, and non-substitutability of an individual's resources—can confer significant organizational influence even on employees who lack seniority or formal rank.
- Introduction: Power and Organizational Structure: Framing power as key to organizational structure
- Coercive and Legitimate Power: Position-based authority and enforcement of compliance
- Reward and Referent Power: Incentives and role-model influence on subordinates
- Expert Power: Specialized knowledge as organizational leverage
- Dependency and Its Relationship to Power: Scarcity and importance as sources of influence
- Conclusion: Power structures are diverse and non-unilateral
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each base of power is clearly defined using a cited source before being applied directly to a specific employee in the case study, creating a consistent and readable analytical pattern.
- The paper moves logically from formal, position-based power (coercive, legitimate) to more personal forms (referent, expert), then transitions naturally into the related concept of dependency.
- Concrete examples—such as the CPA's negotiated work week and the long-tenured employee's overtime—ground abstract theory in observable workplace behavior.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: it introduces each concept with a cited definition, then maps it onto specific individuals in the case study. This technique shows how theoretical frameworks can serve as analytical lenses for interpreting real organizational behavior, a core skill in business and management writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a brief framing of power in organizational contexts, then devotes one or two paragraphs to each of the five bases of power in sequence. A separate section addresses dependency as a distinct but related source of influence. A short conclusion synthesizes the finding that power structures within organizations are diverse and non-unilateral. The structure is straightforward and well-suited to undergraduate case study analysis.
Introduction: Power and Organizational Structure
Who holds authority is a fundamental element that shapes the organizational structure of a company. Part of understanding this notion involves examining the bases of power and the delicate balance between dependency and power. The bases of power are important for understanding how leadership delegates authority over subordinates and other members of an organization as a whole.
Coercive and Legitimate Power
One of the most basic bases of power is coercive power. The research describes coercive power as "the ability of a leader to punish those who do not conform to their ideas or demands" by withholding rewards or punishing those who are not obedient to the leader's demands (Tran, 2007, p. 2). One major example of coercive power is the marketing manager's enforcement of forty-hour work weeks for everyone except Employee 2, who is a CPA. This is not an issue that can be debated, and it can be seen as a form of coercive power from the managerial voice that compels subordinates to comply.
There is also the notion of legitimate power. According to the research, "legitimate power stems from an individual's position within an organization and their right to require and demand compliance from subordinates" (Tran, 2007, p. 2). This type of power is highly formal, and is thus based on the structure of the organization and the leader's position within it. The individual who most represents legitimate power is Employee 2. This employee holds a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) designation and, as such, holds a certain formal power as the only individual within the organization capable of compiling financial statements and documents. Employee 2 wields that power to negotiate a shortened work week, based on the fact that they occupy a position of formal authority tied to their indispensable role in ongoing operations.
Reward and Referent Power
Reward power is "based on the perceived ability of a superior to grant positive or remove negative consequences to those who conform to ideas or demands" (Tran, 2007, p. 2). Of the three individuals in the case study, Employee 1 is the one who clearly works the hardest, putting in significant overtime both in the evenings and on weekends. Due to this dedication, that employee is rewarded. The supervisor who granted a yearly bonus to Employee 1 was exercising reward power to recognize that individual's hard work. This will not only encourage Employee 1 to maintain their effort, but may also motivate other members of the organization to strive equally hard in order to earn financial rewards and recognition from company leadership.
Another base of power is referent power. From this perspective, a leader holds power because they embody the role of a respected role model—people admire their position and perspectives within the organization. From that respected standing, the leader can direct subordinates based on shared mutual respect. Employee 1 can wield some referent power within the larger organizational structure. Once again, Employee 1 works exceptionally hard, extending working hours into evenings and weekends and demonstrating the qualities of a dedicated worker. Moreover, this employee has been with the organization for twelve years, making them a significant part of what the company is today and placing them in the respected position of a seasoned, experienced team member.
Conclusion
Overall, power can come from different places and different positions. Power structures within an organization are not always unilateral, and can be diverse depending on the individual skills and expertise of its employees. It is clear that any company contains a number of different power structures, as demonstrated within the context of this particular case study.
References
Rao, Sree Rama. (2008). Dependency: The key to power. Citeman. Retrieved from
Tran, Thang Q. (2007). Basis of power effects on method of communication. United States Military Academy. Retrieved from http://www.sys.virginia.edu/sieds07/papers/SIEDS07_0004_FI.pdf
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.