Guanxi: Chinese Business Connections and Workplace Dynamics

Introduction to Guanxi

Guanxi is a Mandarin word translated into English as "connections." In Chinese, the term guan means a door or gate, or "to close up" with those around, while xi means to join a chain. Together, "guanxi" can be understood as making connections and relationships with individuals. In China, the word is used to describe a person who knows many people and has many connections that help them get things done.

In simple terms, guanxi can be defined as the relations and connections that individuals develop in their surroundings. It is a process of making dyadic relationships with others and placing unlimited demands on each other. It differs from simple friendship or interpersonal relationships in that it involves a continuous exchange of favors. This reciprocity is not bounded by time and is both intangible and transferable (Park & Luo, 2001, p. 455).

Guanxi has a very long heritage in China; however, it gained importance in Western academic literature—in the fields of sociology, anthropology, social psychology, and business management—only in the 1980s (Tsang, 1998, p. 64). Since then, businesses and social researchers have taken increasing interest in the concept, and its recognized role has continuously expanded. Different experts have offered their views on guanxi and its effects on Chinese business. Some have identified it as the most important and critical factor for doing business in China (Yeung & Tung, 1996, p. 54; Abramson & Ai, 1999, p. 17), while others consider it a source of competitive advantage (Tsang, 1998, p. 65; Fock & Woo, 1998, p. 33). Some scholars have also perceived it as a future direction for doing business in the West during the 21st century (Lovett et al., 1999, p. 231).

Despite being criticized by some experts, guanxi is widely considered a probable solution to many problems facing Chinese businesses. According to Luo (1997, p. 51) and Abramson & Ai (1999, p. 18), personal relationships shaped by guanxi have played a critical role in the great success of Chinese firms. Guanxi is built on the idea that business is conducted between people, not between companies. Entrepreneurs in Chinese firms understand the importance of guanxi and have developed expertise in managing their personal networks. Furthermore, as the Chinese industry has become an increasingly important force in the global economy, many foreign businesses have also recognized the importance of guanxi and have begun adopting guanxi management strategies.

In a 2001 study (pp. 455–477), Park & Luo observed the effect of guanxi on organizational performance. They concluded that Chinese firms use guanxi to promote sales growth, expand markets, and establish a competitive position. Chinese people regard guanxi as a network of connections that is strategically constructed by individuals (Yan, 1996, pp. 1–2). Social interactions are developed through a series of pre-planned activities—for instance, introducing business owners to people who can benefit them (Fan, 2002, p. 543; Chen & Chen, 2004, p. 305).

Guanxi is not linked with any particular group of people; it is dynamically developed and available to everyone. It is not only important for entrepreneurs but equally important at the individual level. It is used by different types of people working at different levels and in different departments of an entrepreneurial firm, including supervisors, subordinates, and colleagues.

Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi

Many experts have focused on guanxi relations between superiors and subordinates. Indeed, most published studies on guanxi have examined the relations between subordinates and their supervisors (Law et al., 2000, p. 751; Chen et al., 2009, p. 375; Yan & Altman, 2009, p. 91).

According to Chen et al. (2009, pp. 375–399), there are three elements of a subordinate's guanxi relationship with their superior: attachment, personal life inclusion, and giving respect and deference to the supervisor. Smith et al. (2011) stated, "Measures of these elements were more predictive of positive outcomes than were simple indices of the presence or absence of guanxi."

Chen et al. (2009, pp. 375–399) and Law et al. (2000, pp. 751–765) studied the behaviors associated with the presence of guanxi in superior-subordinate relationships in China. They found that these behaviors predicted different consequences related to career progress and other outcomes than those derived from American leadership theories.

According to Chua et al. (2009), affect-based trust—or "affective ties"—among Chinese managers was much more strongly associated with perceived reliability, or "cognition-based trust," compared to American managers. An important caveat is that the respondents in this study were not asked to explicitly identify guanxi relationships; rather, their responses about networking and relations were interpreted through an empirical comparison of Chinese guanxi and U.S. networking practices. Each of these studies supports the distinctiveness of guanxi and demonstrates how beneficial it can be for establishing and expanding businesses and achieving mutual benefit.

In light of these benefits, Chen & Chen (2004) have described guanxi as an informal relationship or personal connection between two individuals who are bound by a psychological contract to follow the norms of guanxi—such as "maintaining long-term relationships, mutual commitment, loyalty and obligation" (p. 306).

Alongside these benefits, guanxi has also attracted criticism. Yan & Altman (2009, pp. 91–104) conducted a study in which they asked superiors and subordinates to describe episodes of guanxi. After analyzing the content, they found that two-thirds of incidents were expressed positively, while the remaining episodes were described as exploitation or misuse of the superior-subordinate relationship. This showed that guanxi is not beneficial in all cases and can at times produce negative outcomes. Similarly, Cheung et al. (2009, p. 77) argued that a perceived link between supervisor-subordinate guanxi and positive outcomes was actually attributable to job satisfaction rather than guanxi itself.

Subordinates' Guanxi and Career Outcomes

As noted above, guanxi has not only helped at the organizational level but has also played a significant role in individual development. Studies show that Chinese subordinates use guanxi to enhance their relationships with supervisors and groups that can support their career development (Wei, Lu, Chen, & Wu, 2010). Bian (1997, pp. 366–385) also found that guanxi greatly helps individuals in urban China during job searches. Even after securing employment, subordinates can obtain better promotions, pay increases, and performance ratings from their supervisors by creating and maintaining guanxi.

Law et al. (2000, pp. 751–765) studied the effect of the supervisor-subordinate guanxi relationship on supervisors' decision-making processes. They found that the concept of guanxi was markedly different from other leader-member relationship frameworks. They also observed that, when the effect of performance variables is controlled, guanxi has additional power to influence supervisors' decisions regarding salary increments, bonuses, and promotions.

According to Bian & Ang (1997, p. 981), the key characteristic of guanxi is trustworthiness. This trust develops through long-term interactions and becomes the foundation for future exchange relations. Farh et al. (1998, p. 471) found that guanxi between supervisors and subordinates increases the level of subordinates' trust in their superiors—and this trust is even higher when the parties are neighbors or share a kinship relationship.

Despite these positive aspects, guanxi also carries disadvantages. According to a study by Teng et al. (2012), employees' intention to help their colleagues is negatively related to the supervisor's negative mood and positively related to the employee's own agreeableness. The study also highlighted negative effects for employees with weak guanxi: because they are unable to form strong guanxi with their supervisors, a supervisor's negative mood more directly reduces their inclination to help colleagues. Conversely, employees with strong guanxi with their supervisors are less affected by the supervisor's negative mood. The study therefore recommended that supervisors manage their negative moods and work to establish strong guanxi with subordinates in order to encourage and motivate helping behavior among staff.

Xin, Farh, Cheng, & Tsui (1999) also examined the impact of demographic similarities on supervisor-subordinate guanxi. Their results confirmed that any prior relationship between supervisor and subordinate—such as shared hometown or previous colleagueship—results in a higher quality superior-subordinate relationship and greater organizational commitment. In fact, supervisors who had previously been colleagues of a subordinate gave that subordinate higher performance ratings compared to other team members.

While this may appear to benefit certain subordinates, it conflicts with the principle of fairness. All subordinates should be treated equally and assessed on the basis of their performance rather than their connections with the supervisor. Receiving favorable ratings through guanxi provides an easy path to promotions and bonuses, while those outside the guanxi network may be overlooked regardless of how diligently they work or how strong their performance actually is.

Conclusion

The evidence reviewed above supports the conclusion that guanxi—social connections between subordinates and supervisors, as well as among colleagues and business networks—plays an important role in interpersonal relationships and in creating strong mutual trust. The existence of guanxi is therefore an essential factor in determining the effectiveness of leadership and the overall performance of organizations operating in the Chinese context. As Chinese culture and business practices continue to influence the global economy, understanding guanxi will remain valuable for both domestic and international actors.

References

Abramson, R., & Ai (1999). Canadian companies doing business in China: Key success factors. Management International Review, 39, 17–27.

Bian, Y. (1997). Bringing strong ties back in: Indirect connection, bridges, and job search in China. American Sociological Review, 62, 366–385.

Bian, Y., & Ang, S. (1997). Guanxi networks and job mobility in China and Singapore. Social Forces, 75(3), 981–1005.

Chen, P., & Chen, C. (2004). On the intricacies of the Chinese guanxi: A process model of guanxi development. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 21, 305–324.

Chen, Y., Friedman, R., Yu, E., Fang, W., & Lu, X. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate guanxi: Developing a three-dimensional model and scale. Management and Organization Review, 5, 375–399.

Cheung, Y., Wu, W.-P., Chan, K., & Wong, L. (2009). Supervisor-subordinate guanxi and employee work outcomes: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 77–89.

Fan, Y. (2002). Questioning guanxi: Definition, classification and implications. International Business Review, 11, 543–561.

Farh, L., Tsui, K., Xin, & Cheng (1998). The influence of relational demography and guanxi: The Chinese case. Organization Science, 9, 471–488.

Fock, Y., & Woo, K. (1998). The China market: Strategic implications of guanxi. Business Strategy Review, 7(4), 33–44.

Law, W., Wang, S., & Wang, D. (2000). Effect of supervisor-subordinate guanxi on supervisory decisions in China: An empirical investigation. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 751–765.

Lovett, S., Simmons, L. C., & Kali, R. (1999). Guanxi vs. the market: Ethics and efficiency. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(2), 231.

Luo, Y. (1997). Guanxi and performance of foreign-invested enterprises in China: An empirical enquiry. Management International Review, 37, 51–70.

Park, H., & Luo, Y. (2001). Guanxi and organizational dynamics: Organizational network in Chinese firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 455–477.

Smith, P., Torres, C., Leong, C., Budhwar, P., Achoui, M., & Lebedeva, N. (2011). Are indigenous approaches to achieving influence in business organizations distinctive? A comparative study of guanxi, wasta, jeitinho, svyazi and pulling strings. The International Journal of Human Resource Management. University of Sussex Library.

Teng, C., Lee, C., Chu, T., Chang, H., & Liu, T. (2012). How can supervisors improve employees' intention to help colleagues? Perspectives from social exchange and appraisal-coping theories. Department of Industrial and Business Management, Chang Gung University, Taiwan.

Tsang, K. (1998). Can guanxi be a source of sustained competitive advantages for doing business in China? The Academy of Management Executive, 12(2), 64–73.

Xin, K., Farh, L., Cheng, S., & Tsui, S. (1999). Guanxi and vertical dyads: Evidence from Taiwan and the PRC. Paper presented at the Conference of the Asia Association of Social Psychology, Taipei, Taiwan.

Yan, Y. (1996). The culture of guanxi in a North China village. The China Journal, 35, 1–23.

Yan, Y., & Altman, Y. (2009). Supervisor and subordinate guanxi: A grounded investigation in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 91–104.

Yeung, I., & Tung, R. (1996). Achieving business success in Confucian societies: The importance of guanxi (connections). Organizational Dynamics, Autumn, 54–65.