Book Review: The Bhopal Tragedy by Morehouse & Subramaniam
This book review examines The Bhopal Tragedy: What Really Happened and What It Means for American Workers and Communities at Risk (1986) by Ward Morehouse and M. Arun Subramaniam. The review evaluates the book's structure, thesis, evidence, and argumentative approach, noting its dual role as investigative journalism and activist literature. The reviewer assesses how effectively the authors frame Union Carbide's negligence, the failures of the legal system, and the broader implications for communities living near industrial facilities. The review also identifies areas where additional evidence could have strengthened the argument, while concluding that the book remains a significant work on corporate negligence and social justice.
- Introduction: Context, relevance, and overview of book
- Overview of the Book's Structure and Argument: Book structure, tone, and central thesis
- Evaluation of Thesis and Evidence: Assessment of argument, data sources, and logic
- Strengths and Limitations of the Evidence: What additional evidence could have strengthened the book
- Summary and Significance: Book's lasting value and broader significance
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review clearly identifies the book's dual purpose — investigative journalism and activist literature — and evaluates it on both terms rather than holding it to a single standard.
- The reviewer situates the book within a broader tradition of activist writing, drawing a meaningful comparison to similar works, which demonstrates critical contextual awareness.
- The review offers a balanced critique: it praises what the book does well while specifically identifying what additional evidence could have strengthened the argument, showing genuine analytical engagement.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The review applies an evaluative framework that assesses thesis clarity, evidence selection, logical coherence, and argumentative purpose — essential components of a formal book review. The writer explicitly tracks how well each section of the book supports or departs from the central thesis, demonstrating structured critical reading rather than simple summary.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a conventional book review format: a brief bibliographic note, an introduction establishing context and relevance, an overview of the book's content and structure, a substantive evaluation of the thesis and evidence, and a closing summary of the work's broader significance. This mirrors the standard academic book review format taught at the undergraduate level.
Introduction
Morehouse, W., & Subramaniam, M. A. (1986). The Bhopal tragedy: What really happened and what it means for American workers and communities at risk. Council on International and Public Affairs. 208 pp.
The Bhopal disaster was one of the worst industrial accidents in history. It killed an estimated 5,000 to 30,000 people and poisoned more than half a million. Had the disaster occurred anywhere other than the developing world, it likely would have generated a much larger global scandal; however, because it happened in India, and because US courts refused to hear cases brought against Union Carbide, it remained largely an Indian affair. The relevance of this book lies in the way it takes what was dismissed as an "Indian affair" and reframes it as a much larger tragedy — one that could have and should have been prevented, but was not, because of negligence. It points a finger at the guilty parties who have gone unpunished because they operate behind a wall of corporate power.
The book was written in 1986, two years after the disaster occurred, just as the first cases began to circulate through US courts but before they would be redirected to Indian courts. It is largely written in the cautionary tale genre, doubling as a work of journalism. The book is intended not just for American audiences but for all audiences around the world, because in a global society, everyone is a stakeholder in this tragedy. The perspective represented by the authors is that of journalistic critique. The purpose of the book is to persuade the reader that a tragic injustice was done to the people of Bhopal, and that a similar injustice could be done to any reader in his or her own community if the world permits the perpetrators to go unpunished. Unpunished, they will be certain to repeat such actions.
The book begins by describing what happened at Bhopal in 1984, then moves on to discussing the impact of the disaster. It shifts to a demand for justice for the Bhopal victims and then describes the complex litigation then ongoing. A further shift brings the topic home when the authors ask whether a similar tragedy could occur in the United States. The topic of prevention is then discussed, and a call for citizen action concludes the work.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.