Broken Windows Theory: Social and Cultural Differences
This paper examines the Broken Windows Theory, originally proposed by Wilson and Kelling in 1982, which argues that visible signs of disorder such as graffiti and litter invite escalating crime in communities that fail to police themselves. The paper reviews experimental support for the theory from Kees Keizer and colleagues at the University of Groningen, then critically considers how social and cultural differences across countries introduce new variables that may alter the theory's outcomes. Drawing on Agnew's Strain Theory, the paper argues that while the theory has merit in certain contexts, its application in culturally distinct societies requires careful identification of new variables and an acknowledgment that cultural norms around vandalism and community responsibility vary significantly.
- Introduction to the Broken Windows Theory: Origins and experimental support for Broken Windows Theory
- Social and Cultural Variables in Crime Theory: How new environments introduce variables affecting theory outcomes
- Merit and Limitations Across Communities: Theory's value in poor communities and law enforcement role
- Cultural Differences Between Countries: Cross-national cultural norms and theory applicability
- Research Methodology and Variable Identification: Proper research practice when testing theories in new contexts
- Conclusion: Summary of Broken Windows Theory and cross-cultural limits
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a concrete analogy (children getting sick in different classrooms) to clearly illustrate the concept of variable changes when applying a theory to a new environment.
- Acknowledges the limits of the theory without dismissing it, demonstrating balanced critical thinking by considering cross-cultural applications.
- Integrates multiple theoretical frameworks (Broken Windows and Strain Theory) to strengthen the argument about community disorder and crime escalation.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of theoretical application and critique — it does not simply describe the Broken Windows Theory but tests its boundaries by positing how cultural variables (e.g., China vs. the U.S.) would affect outcomes. This moves the argument from description to analytical evaluation, a key skill in social science writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing and defining the Broken Windows Theory with supporting evidence, then transitions into the central argument about cultural and social variability. Subsequent paragraphs address the theory's continued merit, cross-national differences, and proper research methodology. A brief conclusion synthesizes the main points. The structure follows a clear problem–evidence–complication–resolution pattern appropriate for an undergraduate essay.
Introduction to the Broken Windows Theory
As The Economist (2008) reports, the idea that graffiti and litter can lead to more crime is an old one that was first put forward in the 1980s. The Broken Windows Theory of Wilson and Kelling (1982) argued that neighborhoods that are not taken care of physically — and that allow acts of vandalism to go unchecked, or that suffer from too many abandoned buildings where there is no sense of ownership or responsibility — will naturally attract crime because of the community's lack of self-worth and general indifference. This indifference can lead to an escalation of crime from petty offenses to more serious criminal activity. The essence of the theory is that a community can deter crime by taking responsibility for itself and policing itself: showing community pride in keeping its streets and homes clean, and demonstrating to vandals and other delinquents that their activities will not be tolerated or encouraged through silence.
Recently, Kees Keizer and his colleagues at the University of Groningen "deliberately created such settings as part of a series of experiments designed to discover if signs of vandalism, litter, and low-level lawbreaking could change the way people behave" — and the result was that Broken Windows Theory was proven correct: the small-crimes rate doubled (Economist, 2008).
References
Agnew, R. (2008). Strain Theory. In V. Parrillo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social problems (pp. 904–906). Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Economist. (2008). Can the can. Retrieved from https://www.economist.com/node/12630201
Wilson, J., & Kelling, G. (1982). Broken windows: The police and neighborhood safety. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/1982/03/broken-windows/304465/
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.