This paper examines Lindstrom, Samuelsson, and Hagerfors's (2010) research on business continuity planning methodology, focusing on how three organizations approach continuity planning from an IT security perspective. The paper highlights the finding that only 30% of senior and middle managers recognize IT security as a strategic weakness requiring ongoing improvement. It discusses the critical role of senior management commitment and education, the value of cyclical continuity strategies in smaller organizations, and the progression of organizational maturity in responding to IT security threats. A staircase maturity model illustrating organizational development in business continuity is also described.
In Business Continuity Planning Methodology, Lindstrom, Samuelsson, and Hagerfors (2010) provide insights into how three organizations have structured their continuity planning from an IT security perspective. The authors contend that only 30% of middle and senior management executives recognize that IT security is a strategic weakness in organizations — one that must be continually improved upon and kept current to protect information assets. The authors make this point to underscore the critical need for a continuity planning methodology that encompasses not just systems, but also processes and roles. One of the major outcomes of their research is the definition of a maturity model, described further below.
Citing results from studies conducted across three different organizations, the authors support the hypothesis that contingency planning is typically managed only at the IT level, rather than at the process or role-based level. They contend that much greater levels of education and commitment on the part of senior management are needed. Several studies cited by the authors demonstrate what a significant difference senior management support and commitment make to the development of an effective business continuity strategy. These studies are corroborated by the authors' own research, which reveals a persistent lack of commitment, ongoing education, and preventative strategies within organizations.
"Cyclical learning models in smaller organizations"
"Staircase maturity model and cultural change"
You’re 41% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.