Is Business Ethics an Oxymoron? Ethics and Management
This essay argues that business ethics is not an oxymoron but rather an essential component of sound management practice. Drawing on Collins (1994), the paper contends that while traditional business thinking prioritized short-term efficiency and profit, modern management must recognize the interdependence between business and society. Through the example of product recalls and shifting from "win/lose" to "win/win" strategic thinking, the essay demonstrates that ethical conduct builds consumer trust, supports long-term profitability, and should be embedded in a company's core mission rather than treated as an obstacle to financial success.
- Introduction: Rethinking Business Ethics: Thesis that ethics and good management align
- Short-Term Thinking vs. Ethical Responsibility: Short-term focus undermines long-term ethical value
- Defining Ethics in a Business Context: Ethics defined through product recall example
- From Win/Lose to Win/Win: A New Strategic Philosophy: Shift from competitive to mutual-benefit thinking
- Interdependence Between Business and Society: Firm profitability linked to societal well-being
- Ethics as a Foundation for Long-Term Profitability: Ethics as driver of longevity and trust
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper takes a clear, direct stance in its opening sentence and sustains that position throughout, giving the argument strong coherence.
- A concrete real-world example — a toy manufacturer facing a product recall — grounds the abstract ethical discussion in a practical business dilemma.
- The paper reframes the ethics-versus-profit tension as a false dichotomy by introducing the win/win framework, which is an accessible and persuasive rhetorical move.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the technique of definitional reframing: rather than accepting the premise that business and ethics are opposites, the author systematically unpacks and challenges that assumption by redefining what "good management" means. This approach — establishing a working definition early, then applying it to progressively broader claims — is an effective structure for argumentative essays in business and ethics courses.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with a thesis directly responding to the prompt, then moves through supporting layers: a critique of short-term thinking, a definition of ethics, a philosophical shift in business strategy, and finally the broader business-society interdependence argument. It closes by repositioning ethics as a driver of longevity and profitability. Each paragraph builds on the last, making this a well-sequenced short argumentative essay despite its compact length.
Introduction: Rethinking Business Ethics
Business ethics is not an oxymoron. Like Collins (1994), I agree that businesses should seriously consider the role of ethics within the organization. In fact, good ethics is synonymous with good management. The perception that business and ethics are contradictory stems from a generally accepted but overly narrow view of what managers are supposed to do.
Short-Term Thinking vs. Ethical Responsibility
While efficiency has traditionally been the key indicator for measuring business productivity, in recent years "values" and "ethics" have become just as important. Although every business makes countless decisions each day, most of these decisions do not create ethical dilemmas. In some situations, however, organizations struggle because they focus only on the short-term goals of the company. These managers believe that the core activity of business is simply the production of goods and services. This self-interested goal of management — "making as much money as possible" — creates a short-term emphasis that causes the firm to overlook a critical reality: a lack of ethics in business will prove expensive in the long run.
Defining Ethics in a Business Context
Although ethics has been defined in many ways, it can broadly be understood as a philosophy or system of morals that is open to individual interpretation. The understanding that a person, company, or business "has ethics" simply means that each has decided upon a set of rules to live by and subsequently abides by them. However, following these rules is not enough. A firm should also seriously consider and reframe the question of what is genuinely good for customers and society over the long run.
Consider, for example, a toy manufacturer that discovers a particular toy contains harmful metals. It becomes the ethical responsibility of that manufacturer to recall all affected toys from the market. Yet firms frequently face a difficult dilemma: recall the product and absorb the financial loss, or remain silent? An organization that takes its ethical responsibilities seriously will choose the recall, because it recognizes that consumers will ultimately reward that transparency with lasting trust and confidence in the company's products.
Reference
Collins, John W. (1994). Is Business Ethics an Oxymoron? Business Horizons (Sept–Oct).
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.