This essay argues that business ethics is not an oxymoron but rather an essential component of sound management practice. Drawing on Collins (1994), the paper contends that while traditional business thinking prioritized short-term efficiency and profit, modern management must recognize the interdependence between business and society. Through the example of product recalls and shifting from "win/lose" to "win/win" strategic thinking, the essay demonstrates that ethical conduct builds consumer trust, supports long-term profitability, and should be embedded in a company's core mission rather than treated as an obstacle to financial success.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
The paper demonstrates the technique of definitional reframing: rather than accepting the premise that business and ethics are opposites, the author systematically unpacks and challenges that assumption by redefining what "good management" means. This approach — establishing a working definition early, then applying it to progressively broader claims — is an effective structure for argumentative essays in business and ethics courses.
The essay opens with a thesis directly responding to the prompt, then moves through supporting layers: a critique of short-term thinking, a definition of ethics, a philosophical shift in business strategy, and finally the broader business-society interdependence argument. It closes by repositioning ethics as a driver of longevity and profitability. Each paragraph builds on the last, making this a well-sequenced short argumentative essay despite its compact length.
Business ethics is not an oxymoron. Like Collins (1994), I agree that businesses should seriously consider the role of ethics within the organization. In fact, good ethics is synonymous with good management. The perception that business and ethics are contradictory stems from a generally accepted but overly narrow view of what managers are supposed to do.
While efficiency has traditionally been the key indicator for measuring business productivity, in recent years "values" and "ethics" have become just as important. Although every business makes countless decisions each day, most of these decisions do not create ethical dilemmas. In some situations, however, organizations struggle because they focus only on the short-term goals of the company. These managers believe that the core activity of business is simply the production of goods and services. This self-interested goal of management — "making as much money as possible" — creates a short-term emphasis that causes the firm to overlook a critical reality: a lack of ethics in business will prove expensive in the long run.
Although ethics has been defined in many ways, it can broadly be understood as a philosophy or system of morals that is open to individual interpretation. The understanding that a person, company, or business "has ethics" simply means that each has decided upon a set of rules to live by and subsequently abides by them. However, following these rules is not enough. A firm should also seriously consider and reframe the question of what is genuinely good for customers and society over the long run.
Consider, for example, a toy manufacturer that discovers a particular toy contains harmful metals. It becomes the ethical responsibility of that manufacturer to recall all affected toys from the market. Yet firms frequently face a difficult dilemma: recall the product and absorb the financial loss, or remain silent? An organization that takes its ethical responsibilities seriously will choose the recall, because it recognizes that consumers will ultimately reward that transparency with lasting trust and confidence in the company's products.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.