This paper examines the market structure of Cadillac Automotive, a luxury vehicle manufacturer owned by General Motors, within the broader context of the U.S. automobile industry. Using a comparative framework, the paper evaluates four market structures — perfect competition, monopoly, monopolistic competition, and oligopoly — across dimensions such as barriers to entry, number of firms, price elasticity, and economic profit. The paper concludes that the automotive industry is best characterized as an oligopoly, dominated by a small number of powerful global players. It further discusses how this structure both benefits and constrains Cadillac, and offers competitive and strategic recommendations for improving the company's market position.
Cadillac Automotive is a U.S.-based automobile manufacturer specializing in luxury vehicles. The company is owned by General Motors and is regarded as the second oldest automobile manufacturer in the United States after GM's Buick marque. Cadillac originally manufactured carriages before transitioning to automobiles. Today, the company sells vehicles in more than three dozen countries, with its major operations centered in North America. The industry in which Cadillac operates is highly lucrative; luxury cars generate revenue not through mass production but through premium pricing. The following analysis examines the industry in which Cadillac competes and discusses the market structure that best characterizes it (Automotive Strategy, Planning & Analysis: IHS Automotive, 2013).
The market structure of an industry describes how business is conducted within it. There are four basic types of market structures, and they differ according to the level of government regulation, the number of competing firms, barriers to entry, price elasticity of demand, and the presence of economic profits. The table below describes how the automotive industry compares across these four structures.
Perfect Competition: In perfect competition, there is no product differentiation. Because there are no significant barriers to entry, there are too many organizations in the industry — agricultural markets are a common example. Price elasticity of demand is high because buyers can easily shift to another seller. Companies do not earn economic profits but only marginal ones.
Monopoly: A monopoly features a single market player that faces no competition. Examples include space technology and electricity utilities. Entry is extremely difficult, requiring very high investment, cutting-edge technology, and compliance with strict environmental regulations. The price elasticity of demand is low or zero because there are no substitutes, and the firm earns high economic profits as the sole producer.
Monopolistic Competition: In monopolistic competition, products are differentiated because a company can only stand out if it offers something distinct from competitors. The soft drink beverage industry is a common example. Barriers to entry are low to medium, meaning any entrepreneur with average skills can enter the business. Multiple organizations compete, and high price elasticity of demand results from the availability of similar yet differentiated alternatives.
Oligopoly: An oligopoly is characterized by a small number of large, powerful market players — the automobile industry being a prime example. Barriers to entry are difficult, as existing firms may form clusters or cartels that hinder new entrants. Market players may offer the same or differentiated products. Price elasticity of demand is low because the few dominant firms agree to operate within a set price range, giving consumers little ability to find significantly different prices. High economic profits result from this organizational clustering (SWOT analysis of General Motors, 2013).
The market structure of an automobile company like Cadillac is best described as an oligopoly. Only a few major market players — including GM, Ford, Toyota, Honda, Ferrari, Lamborghini, and BMW — define the informal rules of competition that the industry follows. High costs, environmental regulations, and governmental limitations create significant barriers to entry. While all players in the automotive industry manufacture cars and trucks, they differentiate themselves on the basis of luxury features, style, design, and comfort, and each organization emphasizes product differentiation in its advertising campaigns.
The industry has also undergone excessive mergers and acquisitions that have further consolidated it into an oligopoly structure. Cadillac itself was acquired by GM, reflecting the broader trend of automobile business ownership concentrating among a small number of players (SWOT analysis of General Motors, 2013).
While the automobile industry might superficially resemble perfect competition — given that thousands of manufacturers exist worldwide — the market structure is oligopolistic because only a handful of firms operate at a truly global scale. The market structures also differ on the basis of their demand curves. In perfect competition, demand is constant and no single seller or buyer can influence the market; price is determined by simple supply and demand. In a monopoly, the single firm sets prices freely, earning high revenues because demand is price-inelastic and no substitutes exist. In monopolistic competition, firms face high price elasticity because consumers can choose among similar yet differentiated products. In the automobile industry's oligopoly, the few powerful players effectively agree on a price range, keeping price elasticity of demand low and limiting the consumer's ability to find substantially different prices across competitors.
There are several advantages to operating within an oligopoly structure. Prices are maintained at a level that ensures profits above costs, and existing firms enjoy protection from new entrants due to the high barriers enforced both by industry dynamics and by informal policies (Automotive Strategy, Planning & Analysis: IHS Automotive, 2013). Considerable consumer demand for automobiles means that buyers must purchase within the price range set by the industry.
However, there are notable disadvantages as well. First, Cadillac cannot charge prices that it believes fully reflect the superior quality of its vehicles, as it must remain within the accepted price range of the industry. Second, it is difficult for the company to sustain a strongly differentiated brand image when all major players are constrained to operating within similar parameters.
"Efficiency and consumer impact of oligopoly"
"Pricing and niche strategies available to Cadillac"
"Strategic recommendations for Cadillac's growth"
You’re 59% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.