This essay argues that capital punishment, despite vocal opposition, remains a necessary tool in the American justice system. It begins with a historical overview of the death penalty in the United States, tracing its origins from colonial times through landmark Supreme Court decisions such as Furman v. Georgia and Gregg v. Georgia. The paper then summarizes the principal arguments against capital punishment — including racial and economic disparities in sentencing, the risk of wrongful execution, and constitutional concerns — before systematically refuting each. Finally, it presents affirmative arguments for retaining the death penalty, emphasizing its deterrent effect, advances in DNA technology, and broad public support.
Currently, 38 states have legalized capital punishment statutes. In most states, the reinstatement of the death penalty was a response to public outcry over a perceived increase in violent crime. There are now more than 3,000 people on death row, and more are being convicted each year.
Despite this legalized status, a vocal group of opponents have raised questions regarding the constitutionality, fairness, and effectiveness of capital punishment. This paper argues that opponents of the death penalty are misguided, and that the death penalty is a sad but necessary tool for American society.
The first part of the paper provides an overview of capital punishment in the United States, examining which states have legalized the death penalty and how this punishment is imposed, with particular focus on Texas — the leading state in the number of executions. The second part surveys the concerns of death penalty opponents, including arguments that the death penalty is unfairly administered to the poor and to ethnic minorities, that it is unconstitutional, and that it carries a dangerous risk of false convictions. In the third part, these arguments are refuted and the case for capital punishment is made. It focuses on demonstrating that the death penalty acts as a deterrent to violent crime and argues that advances in DNA technology will make false convictions a thing of the past. If administered fairly and judiciously, capital punishment is a powerful tool for ensuring the rule of law in a civilized society.
The death penalty has a long history in the United States. It was first instituted when early British settlers brought the practice into the colonies. The first execution in recorded American history occurred in 1608, when George Kendall was executed in Virginia for treason. By 1612, the death penalty was imposed for all kinds of minor offenses, including petty theft of grapes.i By 1630, the Massachusetts colony held its first execution, with the New York colony following suit in 1665. Under New York law, hitting one's parents or denying the existence of God were among the crimes punishable by death.ii
By the early twentieth century, different states had developed different practices regarding the death penalty. Nevada instituted the use of cyanide gas in 1924 as a more humane alternative for its inmates. The period of the Great Depression also saw an increase in executions — on average, there were 167 executions per year during the 1930s, more than during any other period in American history.iii
In the 1950s, however, a tide of anti-death-penalty sentiment swept through the United States. By 1972, these sentiments culminated in Furman v. Georgia, which argued that the death penalty was often the result of arbitrary sentencing. This Supreme Court decision held that death penalty statutes had to be rewritten to eliminate "cruel and unusual" forms of punishment. Though the decision found that capital punishment as then practiced was unconstitutional, it left the door open for states to revise their methods of execution in order to comply with the new standards.
Today, a majority of states have death penalty statutes; only 12 states do not. Each death penalty state has different categories of capital offenses, but these generally revolve around various forms of homicide and, in some instances, aggravated kidnapping, aircraft hijacking, and capital sexual assault.
Many well-meaning death penalty activists have argued for the abolition of capital punishment. However, as this paper will show, many of these arguments are misguided or illogical.
First, many opponents argue that the system is fraught with inequity. The disparities in its application make the death penalty discriminatory toward ethnic minorities, the poor, the uneducated, and the mentally challenged. Indeed, most people on death row are poor and uneducated. Many suffer from mental illness. The majority of those on death row are African American or Hispanic.iv
However, this argument overlooks the fact that people in prison have been convicted by juries of their peers. Moreover, studies have shown that although there are more minorities on death row, white defendants have been twice as likely to be executed as their African American counterparts, and many white death row inmates are executed an average of 15 months sooner than Black defendants.v
Second, death penalty opponents point to the risk of executing innocent people. They cite statistics on how many death row inmates have later been found innocent. Between 1976 and 1981, more than 80 death row inmates nationwide were freed after charges against them were dropped due to wrongful convictions and overwhelming evidence of innocence.vi More people continue to be released after being found innocent. To opponents of the death penalty, the danger of executing an innocent person is sufficient reason for a moratorium on capital punishment.
However, the fact that innocent people have been released also demonstrates another truth: the legal system works. The lengthy and complex appeals process allows lawyers and judges to function as checks and balances. The release of prisoners found innocent is proof that the system remains intact. After all, there have been no confirmed cases where an executed person was later found to be innocent.
Related to this concern, advances in DNA technology should allay fears that an innocent person might accidentally be executed. Since every individual's DNA is unique, it is a reliable identifier. Unlike other identifying markers such as fingerprints and facial features, DNA cannot be altered. Modern science can distinguish between individual DNA samples with great accuracy, making DNA testing a much-improved successor to traditional fingerprinting. Scientific techniques are also improving the reliability and efficiency of DNA analysis, allowing investigators to extract evidence from smaller, older, and less well-preserved biological fragments.vii
These improved techniques serve as a safeguard against false convictions and allow investigators and scientists to assess a person's guilt or innocence with far greater accuracy.
In summary, arguments against the death penalty do not always hold water. The supposedly racist nature of capital punishment is contradicted by evidence that white defendants are more likely to be executed and spend shorter amounts of time on death row. Furthermore, advances in DNA techniques provide an added safety net, helping to ensure that the innocent are freed and the guilty are punished.
"Deterrence, DNA science, and public support"
The death penalty remains an emotionally divisive issue to this day. This is understandable, since executions should not be taken lightly. However, there are important reasons why the death penalty must remain an option for juries in the United States.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.