This paper outlines the key components of a career development plan, focusing on three interconnected areas: job analysis, workforce planning, and employee selection methods. It defines job analysis as a systematic process for describing job roles and identifying required personnel attributes. The paper then examines workforce planning as a continuous staffing strategy, addressing both short- and long-term organizational needs — with particular attention to the challenges posed by the merger of InterClean, Inc. and EnviroTech. Finally, it evaluates classic selection methods such as application forms, interviews, and references, weighing their advantages and disadvantages in a post-merger context.
Job analysis is fundamental to creating a better work environment and is essential for building a human resource framework within any organization. Properly defined, job analysis is a purposeful and systematic description of jobs and their related information, structured in a way that distinguishes roles and identifies their unique requirements. The job is broken down into components so that each work activity can be understood and measured, and so that the necessary qualities and attributes of the personnel required to perform that work can be identified (Condrey, 2010).
The components of a job analysis include job description, evaluation, system organization, and responsibilities. It also encompasses cost and payment schedules. Together, these elements give organizations a clear picture of what each position demands and what kind of candidate is best suited to fill it.
The workforce planning system can also be called a staffing strategy. It is a long-term directional plan designed to ensure that properly qualified staff are always available. This continuous process requires ongoing human resource development programs, followed by a staffing plan built upon thorough analysis. Workforce planning can also be focused on short-term requirements, meaning it operates at both short- and long-term levels, with particular emphasis on short-term analysis that informs and carries over into long-term strategy.
Long-term workforce planning is a directional process that determines the routes and functions the workforce should take in the future, establishing the nature and sustainability of the organization's work. It involves prioritizing work patterns and staff models, creating a staffing model for assigned work, and calculating short-term shortages that may be encountered. These are then analyzed to produce a broader working model which, when implemented, supplies the workforce needed by the organization (Bechet, 2008).
The merger between InterClean, Inc. — a company specializing in cleaning chemicals and contract janitorial services — and its counterpart EnviroTech requires a reprogramming of the workforce. Satisfactory relations between both sets of employees are essential for the success of the merger and for future progress (Lifewavebr, 2010). Employee alienation must be avoided, and key concerns in this regard include job security, potential loss or gain of benefits, the blending of organizational cultures, and adjustments to established procedures.
Training and orientation are necessary to help employees adapt to new processes. Where concerns have been resolved and equal status is granted to employees from both organizations, issues tend to be manageable and straightforward. However, where there are unresolved tensions or a perception of hostile takeover, individual employees may experience difficulties and reduced job satisfaction (Gendron, 2004). It is therefore necessary to create a new workforce planning system that can address the staffing challenges arising from the merger.
The classic selection methods — application forms, unstructured interviews, and references — remain in use at many firms. One advantage of application forms is that they can be structured to filter out unqualified candidates automatically. For example, a minimum requirement of six years of sales experience can be built into the form to eliminate applicants who do not meet that threshold. However, a disadvantage of this approach is that it may exclude applicants who possess highly relevant skills that could compensate for a lack of formal experience (Köster, 2007).
References also have their own strengths and weaknesses. Reference checks from previous employers can provide useful background on a candidate's work history, but they may also be influenced by the circumstances under which the person left that employment, introducing potential bias into the evaluation process.
Following the merger of InterClean and EnviroTech, evaluating employees using these established methods may be more appropriate than applying newer testing and evaluation techniques, which may not suit the specific context. Mergers are not a new phenomenon — the steel industry experienced significant consolidation as far back as the 1980s, when firms faced with survival pressures closed obsolete mills, partially restructured operations, or merged into single entities. At that time, traditional selection and evaluation methods proved useful in navigating the workforce transitions that followed (Mangum, Kim, & Tallman, 1996).
Effective human resource management in a merged organization requires careful attention to job analysis, workforce planning, and employee selection. Each component plays a distinct but interrelated role: job analysis clarifies what is needed in each position, workforce planning ensures those needs are met over time, and well-chosen selection methods identify the right people to fill those roles. Classic selection methods, when applied thoughtfully, remain valuable tools for navigating the human resource challenges that organizational mergers inevitably present.
You’re 87% through this paper. Sign up to read the full paper.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.