This essay examines the social, economic, and political conditions in pre-revolutionary France that made armed rebellion against the monarchy inevitable. Drawing on primary sources including Arthur Young's travel writings, the Cahier of 1789, the Declaration of the Rights of Man, and the Civil Constitution of the Clergy, the paper argues that ordinary French citizens — the Third Estate — were systematically denied basic rights through unjust taxation, a corrupt justice system, feudal restrictions on farming and hunting, and a self-serving clergy. The essay traces how these grievances culminated in landmark revolutionary acts, including the Tennis Court Oath and the abolition of the feudal system in August 1789.
This study guide is drawn from PaperDue's library of 130,000+ paper examples across 47 subjects.
Seemingly prudent people go to war against their government when conditions under existing laws make it impossible to earn a living and provide for their families. It was precisely such conditions that led to the French Revolution. When taxation crushes those least able to pay, when courts offer no protection to ordinary citizens, and when the land itself is legally closed off from the people who depend on it, rebellion ceases to be a political act and becomes an act of survival.
The French Kingdom was divided into districts, each headed by an individual called the intendant, appointed by the crown, who held complete authority and total control except in military matters. So enormous was his power that he could exempt, alter, add to, or diminish at pleasure. As a result, his friends, acquaintances, and dependents — along with their own networks — formed a chain of privileged persons who benefited under existing laws at the direct expense of the common people, including their most basic human rights.
This chain of privileged persons was favored in taxation and protected in court. With the nobility and clergy exempt from taxation, the burden fell upon those least able to bear it: the Third Estate. The corvée — a tax paid through labor service rather than money — ruined numerous farmers, many of whom were reduced to beggary. Moreover, commoners were forced to watch their crops destroyed by game such as deer and boars, since it was illegal for them to kill these animals even to save food for their families. It was further illegal to hoe or weed in areas that might disturb the shelter of partridges or other birds prized by noblemen, and certain crops, such as corn, were restricted or forbidden outright to prevent injury to those birds. Commoners were, in effect, slaves of the kingdom.
On August 11, 1789, the feudal system was abolished, returning the right to farm the land to the Third Estate and restricting the game reserves of the nobility. Within the Declaration of the Rights of Man of 1789, Article 1 proclaimed: "Men are born and remain free and equal in rights… Social distinctions may be founded only upon the general good," while Article 2 protected the rights of liberty, property, security, and resistance to oppression.
With the justice system existing for the nobility alone — judges were often charlatans who held court in taverns — the great majority of Frenchmen, the Third Estate, had no legal representation and no meaningful way to defend themselves if charges were brought against them. Even smuggling salt, or merely purchasing smuggled salt, could result in up to nine years in prison.
Among the list of grievances and declarations presented by the Third Estate in the Cahier of 1789 was Article 12, which stated: "to remove forever the possibility of injury to the personal and proprietary rights of Frenchmen, the jury system shall be introduced in all criminal cases, and in civil cases for the determination of the fact, in all the courts of the realm." This demand reflected how completely the existing legal system had failed ordinary citizens and how urgently structural reform was needed.
"Church abuses prompting the Civil Constitution of the Clergy"
"Third Estate asserts sovereignty outside the palace"
Conditions in France had reached such a point that mere human survival was at stake. If a man is not allowed to farm land for crops and is forbidden to hunt for game, it is impossible to provide for his own existence, much less for his family — to say nothing of the consequences that would befall his family should he be imprisoned. When people are prevented from accessing the basic foundations of life, they are left with only two choices: accept such a fate and perish, or rebel for survival. The French Revolution was, at its core, the latter.
You’re 71% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.