This paper examines the principal causes of the United States trade deficit, moving beyond a simple capital-flow explanation to consider a broader set of macroeconomic factors. It argues that excessive aggregate demand — driven by consumer debt, flexible credit markets, and government spending — compels massive imports of goods and services. The paper also considers the roles of a strong dollar, high interest rates, and the federal budget deficit in widening the trade gap. It concludes by dismissing declining export competitiveness as a primary cause and notes that, without targeted financial and macroeconomic policy reforms, the trade deficit is unlikely to improve significantly.
The US trade deficit has been a growing concern for the American economy over recent years. Starting from a capital-related definition, the US trade deficit can be understood as a result of "a net inflow of capital to the United States from the rest of the world" [1]. According to this source, this inflow stems from both the attractiveness of American assets on global markets and a low domestic savings rate that is insufficient to finance all available investment opportunities.
However, the discussion of the US trade deficit must extend beyond the simple issue of capital inflow. One of the most important causes of the mounting trade deficit is the constantly ascending trend of national aggregate demand. As economists have put it, the "U.S. economy spends more than it produces" [2]. This excessive spending creates the necessity of massive imports of products and services in order to satisfy aggregate demand. Together, the consistent capital inflow and the significant importation of goods and services constitute the most important structural cause of the US trade deficit.
Aggregate demand is also stimulated by consumer debt. A flexible financial sector — featuring accommodating lending policies and low borrowing rates — encourages individual indebtedness and, consequently, increased individual spending. This cycle of credit-driven consumption amplifies the gap between what the US economy produces and what it consumes, placing additional upward pressure on the trade deficit.
There are also specific, policy-driven causes of the US trade deficit that vary with different macroeconomic conditions over time. A strong dollar, for example, encourages massive imports rather than domestic production and exports, thereby widening the trade deficit. When the dollar is strong, foreign goods become relatively cheaper for American consumers and businesses, shifting demand away from domestically produced alternatives.
High interest rates similarly push the trade deficit higher, because investors become more attracted to purchasing financial assets in the United States in search of greater returns. This increased investor interest amplifies the capital inflow into the country, further expanding the deficit in the current account.
"Government spending indirectly boosts the trade gap"
"Declining competitiveness dismissed as primary cause"
Without proper financial and macroeconomic policies, we are not likely to see any meaningful changes in the US trade account in the near future. Despite a devalued dollar throughout 2007 and much of 2006, the trade account deficit remained a significant problem for the US administration. Addressing the deficit will require coordinated efforts to curb excessive aggregate demand, reform credit markets, and implement sound fiscal policies that reduce both the federal budget deficit and its indirect stimulation of imports.
You’re 62% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.