This paper examines how the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) uses SWOT analysis as a foundation for strategic planning in response to the Zika virus outbreak. The paper identifies the CDC's organizational strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats related to the epidemic, then explains how each element informs the planning process. Drawing on an interview with a public health administrator, the paper also explores how strategic plans are developed, who participates in the process, how resources are allocated, and what best practices guide effective planning. The analysis highlights the integral relationship between SWOT findings and actionable, goal-oriented strategic plans.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has a mission of protecting the health of all Americans at all times. The jurisdiction of its actions includes the protection of Americans both within and outside the country. The organization focuses on the prevention and treatment of chronic diseases that compromise the health of Americans (Xu et al., 2016). The emergence of the Zika virus prompted many health organizations to conduct intensive research to identify its causes, cures, and prevention strategies. The CDC is among the key health stakeholders that took a leading role in attempting to provide solutions to the problem. The following sections present a SWOT analysis of this problem-solving process, along with a discussion of how it informs strategic planning.
The table below outlines the key strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats identified in the CDC's response to the Zika virus outbreak.
Availability of resources to finance the project;
Skilled health professionals within the CDC;
Strong and capable leadership;
Clear goals aligned with the organization's core objectives.
Financial constraints in funding the development of new treatments;
Insufficient resources specifically related to the Zika virus;
Lack of effective coordination among the large number of health practitioners involved.
Experienced health professionals available for deployment;
Availability of relevant equipment;
Physical facilities capable of addressing the problem;
Support from other health organizations facing similar challenges.
Emergence of other diseases competing for attention and resources;
The burden of ordinary organizational responsibilities, given that the Zika virus response represents an added workload.
All projects succeed when sufficient resources are available to fund them. For this reason, finance is appropriately included as one of the strengths of the organization (Holtgrave & Greenwald, 2016). When the problem an organization seeks to address takes the form of an epidemic affecting large numbers of people — as is the case with the Zika virus, which poses serious risks to pregnant women — adequate resources must be at the organization's disposal. Other important elements listed under strengths include a skilled labor force, sound leadership, and clear organizational goals. The absence of any of these elements would make it significantly more difficult for the organization to achieve its objectives.
The items selected under opportunities — experienced professionals, relevant equipment, physical facilities, and inter-organizational support — represent external and internal assets the CDC can leverage. The weaknesses and threats identified are equally important, as they highlight gaps that planners must address and risks that require mitigation strategies.
As a public health administrator, the information produced by a SWOT analysis is directly useful in developing a strategic plan. For example, identifying available resources to finance a community-based project is a critical step in the planning process. Strategic planning functions as a road map that aids in the attainment of organizational goals. It is one of the primary tools for identifying problems, estimating required resources, and projecting potential threats. The weaknesses identified during SWOT analysis are especially valuable to planners because they reveal areas where corrective action is needed to reduce negative outcomes.
Strategic planning also requires decisions about which issues to include and which to exclude from the plan. The strengths of the organization are important because they help administrators identify ways to minimize problems (Heinrich, 2014). Threats, on the other hand, must be carefully considered so that proper mitigation measures can be incorporated. A strategic plan is not fully effective without grounding it in SWOT findings. Planning involves the allocation of resources to various activities, and most planners draw directly from their SWOT analysis to determine what to include. For example, when an organization faces numerous threats, some resources must be set aside to address potential emergencies.
"Administrator interview reveals real planning processes"
"Prioritizing resources based on plan objectives"
The advice for individuals new to the planning process is that they need to equip themselves with best practices. Those seeking to become effective planners must have a desire to learn from experienced professionals. Knowledge gained from individuals who have been in the field for a long time is especially valuable because they bring first-hand experience that cannot be replicated through theory alone.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.