This paper applies strategic market planning frameworks to FedEx Corporation, examining how the company leverages integrated marketing communications, IT systems, and service innovation to maintain its position as a global logistics leader. The analysis moves through ten structured areas: marketing foundations, strategic innovation, SWOT analysis, buyer behavior, competitive positioning, branding, pricing, distribution, IMC decisions, and global growth recommendations. Drawing on FedEx's B2B dominance, customer satisfaction metrics, and disruptive entry into third-party logistics and supply chain services, the paper identifies both the company's core strengths and the strategic vulnerabilities—particularly overdependence on the U.S. market—that must be addressed to sustain long-term growth.
FedEx (NYSE: FDX) is one of the leading providers of global logistics services to both the Business-to-Business (B2B) and Business-to-Consumer (B2C) marketplaces worldwide. FedEx is particularly strong in the United States, where 73% of total revenues in its most recent fiscal year were generated (FedEx, 2010). FedEx's approach to marketing emphasizes its role as a trusted advisor in shipping, third-party logistics (3PL), and supply chain services (Trunick, 2004). The company has been highly successful with its branding and marketing strategy, being consistently recognized as one of the top ten brands in the world by Fortune magazine in its annual surveys (Elmer-DeWitt et al., 2008). FedEx successfully uses integrated marketing communication (IMC) strategies to strengthen its brand image and reputation for speed, trustworthiness, and accuracy in the delivery of packages, documents, and—in the case of logistics services—entire ship-board containers (Anderson, Narus, & van Rossum, 2006). The branding has been so successful that the company's name has become synonymous with shipping, much as Kleenex has become the everyday word for facial tissue (Christensen, Cook, & Hall, 2005).
The FedEx culture revolves around a strong commitment to customer service and accountability. This culture is further supported by state-of-the-art information technology (IT) systems that automate package tracking and delivery verification, enabling customers to confirm delivery status through the FedEx website (Alghalith, 2007). Because 80% of FedEx revenue is generated from B2B customers globally, automating many customer-facing tasks is critical to the company's profitability (FedEx, 2010). These technology capabilities form the foundation of FedEx's marketing strategies and unique value proposition. Owing to this commitment to responsive and accountable service, FedEx placed highest in the most recent American Customer Satisfaction Index in the express delivery category (FedEx, 2010). FedEx also uses the well-known SERVQUAL methodology to regularly quantify and analyze where customer expectations are being met and where they are not (FedEx, 2010). This methodology provides FedEx with insight into how best to invest in improving marketing communications, how to set expectations more accurately, and how to address areas of customer service that require attention—all of which form the foundation for the company's approach to strategic innovation.
Marketing plays a central role in the strategic planning of FedEx. Any potential merger, acquisition, or new service launch must remain consistent with and supportive of the unique value proposition that has proved so successful (Anderson, Narus, & van Rossum, 2006). Second, the implications of strategic plans on brand value must be considered and planned for over the long term. Third, entering entirely new markets—as the company has attempted in the 3PL and supply chain services areas (McAree, Bodin, Ball, & Segars, 2006)—is extremely risky and must be coordinated at the advertising and marketing strategy level to ensure success (Lester, 2000). All of these factors contribute to the central role marketing plays in the strategic planning process.
FedEx defines the new service development process differently depending on which area of the business it is attempting to grow. For the acquisition of Kinko's in 2004, the strategy centered on services-based innovation practices that the company had strengthened in its B2B businesses (Kohnen, 2007). The acquisition of the copy and services chain was also driven by the need to establish a greater market presence in the B2C market, where FedEx and other shipping and logistics providers have historically had difficulty gaining traction (Novack & Thomas, 2004). The new services development process also takes into account the core vertical markets in the B2B industry that generate the majority of FedEx's revenue—including retail trade and the retail supply chain, finance and insurance (due to time-sensitive documents requiring co-signatures on originals), healthcare (where agreements must be delivered as printed originals for signature), and the remaining 20% representing B2C shipping spend (FedEx, 2010). The decision to acquire Kinko's took these markets into account, along with the potential to deliver service cost savings and time efficiencies to each segment through service innovation (Kohnen, 2007).
Another aspect of FedEx's new service development strategy is based on disrupting existing business models, as seen in the launch of its supply chain and logistics outsourcing service (Christensen, Anthony, Berstell, & Nitterhouse, 2007). FedEx set out to disrupt the supply chain services and 3PL markets by offering end-to-end service programs at costs significantly below existing competitors (Nichols, 2003). The result has been steady growth in this business unit and a complete redefinition of operating efficiency and automated logistics in the market. FedEx also concentrates on converting strategic innovation into competitive advantage through strategic market planning (McAree et al., 2006).
The strategic market planning process seeks to identify markets where the company can excel through service or disruptive innovation while also radically improving process efficiencies in the markets and industries it chooses to enter (Varadarajan, 2010). The successful development of Kinko's and the launch of the supply chain services business are cases in point (Kim, Yang, & Kim, 2008). The company regularly assesses its unique strengths and identifies where they can be successfully applied to new and emerging markets. A SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis provides insight into the future strategic direction of FedEx.
FedEx has concentrated on creating unique competencies and strengths in the areas of logistics and supply chain expertise (Bhardwaj & Momaya, 2006); optimizing routing systems through effective use of IT strategies (Novack & Thomas, 2004); continual investment in brand equity to ensure market leadership; development of alternative channels for small and medium businesses (SMBs) and the B2C market (Gordon, 1992); and a corporate culture that rewards exceptional customer service (Spence & Essoussi, 2010). Of these, the expertise in logistics and supply chains and the IT investments that streamline routing systems provide marketing with a solid foundation for committing to exceptional service delivery. These strengths are also evident in how effectively the company has integrated 1,200 Kinko's stores into its logistics, pricing, and global routing systems (FedEx, 2010).
FedEx is overly dependent on the U.S. market, where 80% of total revenues are generated, and its jet fleet is aging rapidly (FedEx, 2010). These two factors, combined with a lack of market growth throughout Europe, have kept FedEx's revenue growth essentially flat in recent years. FedEx is losing ground in Europe to other logistics and freight companies, including UPS and several Asian-based competitors (Kim, Yang, & Kim, 2008). The lack of success in Europe could lead to further earnings declines and needs to be addressed through a joint venture, merger, or acquisition.
Given its unique set of core strengths, FedEx has many excellent opportunities for growth. First, the FedEx Ground business has proved resilient to economic downturns and is predicted to form the foundation for $1.8 billion in incremental growth by 2012 (FedEx, 2010). Second, FedEx has significant potential to earn additional revenue from the logistics and supply chain management of automotive goods, high-fashion products, high technology, and pharmaceuticals—industries that share many of the same characteristics as the markets that have historically underpinned FedEx's success. The value-to-weight segments of the freight industry also show significant potential for growth that FedEx has yet to fully capitalize on.
The greatest threat the company faces is the unpredictable cost of fuel and the escalating costs of jet aftermarket support services, which have the most immediate impact on monthly profitability. Second, the lack of privatization of the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) and the possibility that the government will continue to subsidize technology for the service—rather than outsourcing to FedEx—represents a meaningful competitive threat. The USPS operates at a perennial loss running into the billions of dollars, and if the U.S. government chooses to invest massively in upgrading it into a direct competitor, FedEx would see a reduction in sales (FedEx, 2010). Another critical threat is continued merger and acquisition activity in the logistics markets, combined with the growth of automated shipping technologies and web-based platforms. These two factors could enable a competitor to deliver tracking and shipping at or below FedEx's cost structure.
"B2B analytics, CRM systems, and market segments"
"Four service divisions, pricing optimization, and mix"
"Multichannel distribution, IMC campaigns, global growth"
You’re 37% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.