This paper examines the communist legacies of China and Mongolia and how both countries evolved following the end of the Cold War toward a form of "socialist modernity." Rather than fully abandoning socialist frameworks, each state adapted its political and economic structures to contemporary global realities in distinct ways. Mongolia transitioned toward multiparty parliamentary democracy and a market economy driven by privatization, while China maintained single-party rule and state control over industry while simultaneously becoming a leading technology-driven economy. The paper argues that these divergent trajectories illustrate how socialist governance can persist and even flourish within the context of economic globalization and modernization.
The history of Asia can be considered one of the most controversial, dynamic, and interesting segments of the history of human civilization. This is largely due to the fact that the region experienced several influences over the centuries in terms of political, economic, and social development. One of the most important ideas shaping the area's evolution, however, is the communist influence that developed as a central feature of the region's political environment.
One of the most relevant examples is China and its neighbor Mongolia. Both countries experienced the communist trend in its strongest aspects; however, following the end of the Cold War, the situation in both evolved toward a different type of socialism — one that is adapted, to a certain extent, to the current realities of political and economic globalization. Despite the changes brought about by the fall of the U.S.S.R., there are still obvious signs of socialist rule in each country, adapted to the demands of the modern era. Both Mongolia and China, therefore, can be said to be experiencing socialist modernity.
The history of the communist element in the region is closely related to the Chinese model. China is considered one of the most important sources of communist governance in part because its approach differs from that of the Russian model. The Mongolian state, by contrast, was shaped primarily after Soviet standards. This is evident when examining the situation following the end of the Cold War. As Worden and Savada (1989) noted: "Mongolia in 1989 was a communist state modeled on Soviet political and government institutions. The government was a one-party system, presided over by the Mongolian People's Revolutionary Party. The party exercised political supervision and control over a pyramidal structure of representative governmental bodies known as hurals — assemblies of people's deputies." As states tried to recover from communism, the differences between the Western perspective and the communist realities of such regions became increasingly visible.
The situation in China at the end of the Cold War can be understood as the result of a strategic reassessment of the emerging new world order. The Chinese government recognized that the bipolar struggle for power and economic dominance that had defined global politics until 1989 was over, and that a fundamentally different perspective on world affairs was required. As Hu (1995) observed: "The end of the Cold War has changed China's basic perception of world politics and its conception of national security. When the Soviet Empire and the East European communist regimes collapsed, the structure of the postwar international system dissolved, and the old parameters for Beijing's security strategy disappeared. The Chinese leadership suddenly found itself in a totally new world in which China needed to reorient and redefine its security strategy on a new strategic axis." China was thus acutely aware of the necessity to adjust aspects of both its foreign and domestic policy in order to maintain its standing in the world.
The concept of socialist modernity is, in certain respects, an abstract one. Although there are fields of study that work to define the term precisely, it can also be interpreted as a new starting point for the modernization of a country or for the reconsideration of a political approach. Modernity, in this sense, implies evolution — yet at the political level or at the level of cultural transformation, it can be seen as an irreversible and unstoppable process. As Echeverria (n.d.) has written: "Modernization is not a life project we have chosen to adopt; it is more like a fatality or unquestionable destiny we must submit ourselves to… social life still seems to have the same objective: modernization, that is to say self-improvement by making progress on the lines of production techniques, social organization, and political management that began to take shape in Europe during the sixteenth century." The process of modernization is, in this view, inevitable.
The socialist influence has been an important factor in shaping the evolution of both regimes. Neither Mongolia nor China possesses state apparatuses with the will or the structural incentive to shift entirely to a capitalist line of thought. Numerous state institutions operate according to systems that cannot easily be changed, nor is there motivation to do so. The notion of socialist modernity therefore best characterizes both political entities, as is evident from both a political and an economic perspective.
The Mongolian political framework has undergone a significant reconsideration of democratic principles. Free elections have been conducted since 1990, and these are regarded as meeting the standards set by international observers. The United States Department of State noted that "Mongolia continued its transition from a highly centralized, Communist-led state to a full-fledged, multiparty, parliamentary democracy, although these gains still must be consolidated" (U.S. State Dept., 2001). Despite the early-stage nature of this democratic development, the Mongolian leadership recognized that steps had to be taken to improve both the political process and social conditions in the country. The president is elected through universal suffrage, and there is a defined separation of powers among the branches of the state.
Mongolia currently has some twenty registered political parties, a level of plurality that reflects a fundamentally different system from that of China. While Mongolia is clearly on a path toward democratization, the country still faces challenges common to post-communist states, including the consolidation of democratic institutions and the persistence of political corruption.
"Single-party rule and leadership consolidation in China"
"Privatization in Mongolia vs. state control in China"
Overall, both Mongolia and China carry communist legacies. However, for Mongolia, there were few options other than a full attempt at democratization, a road it is slowly and steadily taking. China, by contrast, has had the luxury of maintaining its political structure largely intact while advancing technologically and becoming one of the most important economies in the world. The example of China is particularly instructive for understanding how socialism can not only coexist with modernity but can, under certain conditions, actively contribute to it.
You’re 56% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.