This paper critiques Peter Barnes' article "Strategic Moves," which outlines four strategies for managing disruptive student behavior in the classroom. The critique evaluates each strategy in turn: acting quickly to address misbehavior, holding private conversations with disruptive students, publicly stating rules and consequences at the moment of an offense, and refraining from blaming parents while maintaining home-school communication. The author agrees with several of Barnes' approaches but raises practical objections, particularly regarding classroom disruption and the timing of private conversations with students. The paper concludes that Barnes' strategies offer a useful foundation that teachers can adapt to fit their individual classroom needs.
Teaching is an honorable profession that can, at times, be overwhelming. To be an effective teacher, one must have a genuine passion for the work and the stamina to keep up with children. There are moments when a student behaves in ways that disrupt the classroom, and teachers must know how to address such behavior effectively. Every teacher develops his or her own methods and strategies for managing an unruly student. In his article "Strategic Moves," Peter Barnes discusses four strategies that have worked for him when dealing with disruptive students. According to Barnes, each of these approaches has proven effective in maintaining a productive classroom environment.
Barnes lists acting quickly when an offense first occurs as his first strategy, arguing that ignoring behavior or addressing it later is counterproductive. He describes taking away privileges or moving the student to another location in the room with minimal interruption to the other students, contending that this method is less disruptive to the class overall.
It is reasonable to agree that unwelcome behavior should not be ignored. However, some disruption to the classroom is inevitable whenever a child is moved or privileges are removed. Children are very observant and will pause what they are doing to watch how the teacher handles the situation. This method can be effective, provided there is no assumption that the classroom will remain completely undisturbed — some interruption, however brief, is a natural consequence given the nature of children.
Barnes' second strategy involves having a personal conversation with the disruptive student. He suggests this should take place on the teacher's own time and terms, and he appears to assume that such a conversation can occur without disrupting the rest of the class. A more practical alternative would be to speak with the child during recess, away from peers. Disciplining a child in front of classmates may cause the student to become defensive or shut down, making it harder to uncover the underlying cause of the disruptive behavior.
"Assessing public correction as a classroom tool"
"Balancing parent blame with productive outreach"
"Summary judgment and adaptability of strategies"
You’re 49% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.