This paper examines the application of Lee Canter's Assertive Discipline framework to a specific first-grade classroom scenario. It outlines Canter's three-step positive behavior management cycle — pre-teaching expected behaviors, using positive repetition to reinforce desirable conduct, and applying outlined consequences when needed. The paper then applies these principles to an individualized behavior plan for a hyperactive, easily distracted first-grade student. The plan details pre-teaching strategies using a picture-based rule chart, reinforcement techniques, and a six-step discipline hierarchy tailored to the student's needs and strengths, with the overarching goal of supporting the student's positive social disposition and school engagement.
This paper demonstrates applied theory writing — the skill of translating a named theoretical framework (Canter's Assertive Discipline) into a concrete, student-specific intervention plan. It uses the theory's own structural components (pre-teach, reinforce, discipline) as the organizational spine of the practical section, showing how academic frameworks directly inform professional classroom decisions.
The paper opens with a concise summary of Canter's theory and its goals, then introduces the student and teacher context. A dedicated section profiles the student's challenging and positive behaviors separately. The core of the paper is the individualized behavior plan, divided into the three components of Canter's cycle. A brief conclusion addresses the student's involvement in shaping the plan and the teacher's affective goals. References follow in APA format.
Lee Canter's theory on classroom discipline is designed to accomplish two primary objectives: (1) increase teachers' efficiency when dealing with student disruption, and (2) reduce incidences of unacceptable behavior by providing proactive instruction about expected student conduct (Burden, 2003). Canter recommends a three-step cycle of behavior management to increase positive student behavior and ensure a productive learning environment.
The three steps of the positive behavior management cycle are as follows: (1) pre-teach the positive behaviors that students are expected to perform; (2) use positive repetition to reinforce instances of desirable behavior; and (3) if undesirable behaviors do occur following implementation of steps one and two, apply the negative consequences outlined in the students' Discipline Plan. Underlying this three-step cycle is the belief that children learn to make good choices through clear follow-up with appropriate, well-understood positive and negative consequences (Arthur-Kelly et al., 2006).
The student is a new child in the first-grade classroom. The instructor is in her second year as an elementary school teacher and, although she is still developing her teaching and discipline styles, she implements Assertive Discipline in her classroom — it is the official discipline program in the district.
Overall, the student is an agreeable and friendly child, but he appears to be quite hyperactive and to have some attention challenges. The instructor has referred him for a special services assessment, but she is adamant that all children in her classroom can benefit from modeling and reinforcing positive behavior. For children who appear to need the most support in engaging in desirable behaviors, she has found that a specific plan individually tailored to each child is very helpful in producing expedient positive behavior change.
The student exhibits the following problem behaviors in the classroom: difficulty staying in his seat for extended periods, even when happily engaged in activities; social talking during group settings; high levels of distraction during transitions from one setting to another and during task shifts; and inattention when instructions are being given.
The following plan is structured around the three components of Canter's positive behavior management cycle: pre-teaching, reinforcing, and discipline.
The instructor has created a picture chart for the student that represents the classroom rules. She reviews the pictures with him each morning, asking him to choose one rule to focus on for that day. The student is still held accountable for all rules; the daily choice simply directs his attention to a particular area of emphasis.
The instructor's reminders emphasize the rule the student is currently working on, and she also recognizes other students when they practice good behaviors — thereby making acceptable behaviors more salient for the student by embedding them in the broader classroom culture.
The instructor uses the following hierarchy of discipline strategies with the student:
(1) A silent, visible signal given to the student when the instructor observes that he is beginning to veer off course.
(2) An explicit verbal observation directed to the class, such as: "I see children sitting in their seats."
(3) Proximity praise directed to the student's tablemates — for example: "I see Janine, Brett, and Scott are ready to listen."
(4) Positive repetition: for no more than three repetitions, redirect the student to his seat so that he is ready to listen to directions for the next step, keeping the message and language clear, which in essence repeats the classroom rules.
(5) Inform the student that he has made a choice to forgo receiving one of his green-colored tags for that day, but that he can still work to earn the remaining green tags.
(6) Additional lost green tags during that day will result in a visit to the principal's office.
The student had some input into the hierarchy of discipline used when he makes poor choices, and his contributions were notably stringent. He very much wants to be accepted by his classmates and to have his teacher's approval. One of the instructor's fundamental goals is to support the student's pleasant demeanor and happy outlook toward being at school, ensuring that the management structure strengthens rather than undermines his developing sense of belonging.
You’re 86% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.