This paper examines the economic dimensions of the U.S. coal mining industry, covering approximately 1,000 companies and $25 billion in annual revenue. It explores shifts and price elasticity of supply and demand, positive and negative externalities such as environmental pollution and regulatory pressure, wage inequality relative to other industries, and monetary and fiscal policy concerns tied to carbon emissions and clean energy investment. The paper draws on U.S. Department of Labor data and industry sources to assess how automation, geographic production shifts, and climate change policy are likely to reshape employment, wages, and the long-term viability of coal as a primary energy source.
The paper demonstrates applied economic analysis, using standard microeconomic and macroeconomic concepts to evaluate a real-world industry. By pairing U.S. Department of Labor workforce data with environmental and investment policy arguments, it shows how multiple economic forces interact simultaneously to shape an industry's outlook — a technique central to industry report writing at the undergraduate level.
The paper opens with an industry overview establishing scale and market structure, then moves through four analytical sections organized by economic concept: supply and demand elasticity, externalities, wage inequality, and monetary/fiscal policy. Each section draws on a distinct set of sources before converging in a conclusion that synthesizes trends in production, employment, wages, and climate-driven investment shifts.
This paper discusses the impact on the coal mining industry in terms of shifts and price elasticity of supply and demand, positive and negative externalities, wage inequality, and monetary and fiscal policies. It concludes with final thoughts on how the economy affects the success of this industry and the economic influences that can affect it negatively.
The coal mining industry in the United States is comprised of approximately 1,000 companies operating approximately 1,500 mines, with combined annual revenue of roughly $25 billion. Some of the larger producers include Peabody Energy, Arch Coal, and Massey Energy. Over the past decade, the coal mining industry has become greatly consolidated; presently, sixty-five percent of the market is owned by approximately ten companies, each operating a single coalmine, with the size of mines varying a great deal. Larger operations produce over 1 million tons of coal annually.
According to Hoover's industry overview of coal mining, "Demand comes mainly from generators of electricity. Profitability depends on efficient operations, as the product is a commodity sold on the basis of price" (Hoovers, 2008). Smaller companies are able to compete when they supply customers locally or when they hold long-term contracts, while larger companies "have large economies of scale in production and distribution" (Hoovers, 2008). The coal mining industry is "capital-intensive and highly automated" (Hoovers, 2008), with average annual revenue per employee reported at $300,000.
A World Steel Review published in December 2007 states: "Crude steel production in the 67 countries reporting to the IISI totaled 114 million tons in October, 6.6% up on October 2006. The ten months total was 1,102 million tons, 8.1% higher than the same period last year. However, excluding China, the rise in steel production was only 2.8% in October and 2.9% in the year to date" (World Steel Production Report, 2007). This growth in global steel production reflects rising demand for coking coal, influencing both supply dynamics and pricing within the broader coal market.
The U.S. Department of Labor forecasts that coal demand will increase "as coal remains the fuel source for electricity generation" (2007). Environmental concerns are significant in relation to coal power, as burning coal releases pollutants and carbon dioxide. Few alternatives exist on a scale large enough to meet the fuel demands of utilities. Natural gas burns cleaner than coal, but coal power plants equipped with scrubbers reduce this disadvantage, and both fuels emit greenhouse gases. Recent increases in the price of natural gas have also caused some electricity producers to delay their conversion to natural gas, helping to maintain demand for coal. Future increased use of nuclear power or renewable energy sources — such as solar or wind power — could reduce demand for coal, but over the projection period neither is expected to increase rapidly enough to contribute significantly to U.S. energy supplies (U.S. Department of Labor, 2007).
It is also expected that advances in technology in the mining industry will adversely affect employment in coal mining due to "new machinery and processes that will increase worker productivity" (U.S. Department of Labor, 2007). These advances will result in a need for fewer workers than previously required for the "operation and maintenance of new mining machines that are operated remotely by computer and that self-diagnose mechanical problems" (U.S. Department of Labor, 2007).
Environmental concerns will greatly affect mining operations. Government regulations are reportedly increasing with respect to land access restrictions and mining restrictions designed to protect animal and native plant life and to reduce water and air pollution. Population growth is increasingly resulting in the expansion of residential settlements into areas near mining activities. The depletion of the most accessible coal deposits in the East, combined with these factors, is forecast to result in "a shift in coal production. Coal mining will increase in the Central, and particularly the Western, United States and decrease in the East" (U.S. Department of Labor, 2007). Overall, coal-mining employment is forecast to experience "little employment change as rising demand for coal is met with productivity gains from more efficient and automated production operations" (U.S. Department of Labor, 2007).
You’re 48% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.